- Esug-list - lists.esug.org

Fwd: looking for volunteers to teach in Ghana this summer 2012

by Stéphane Ducasse

So may be a nice lecture about Smalltalk and cool projects would be a good idea. Stef Begin forwarded message: > From: Dominique Sotteau <dominique.sotteau(a)seznam.cz> > Subject: looking for volunteers to teach in Ghana this summer 2012 > Date: December 10, 2011 4:59:30 PM GMT+01:00 > To: dominique.sotteau(a)seznam.cz > > Dear madam, sir, > > This is an email to reach those who showed some interest for the AHED project at the University of Cape Coast, Ghana, whose aim is to update the level of lecturers of the Department of Computer Science and Information Technology (DCSIT) of this university (and other universities in Ghana) and work on guiding them towards a PhD. The ultimate goal is to install an MSc and a PhD program in the department (which today offers only undergraduate training). > > We would be grateful if you could forward the attached announcement to colleagues who might be interested. > > We are looking for two volunteers who would be willing to teach in Cape Coast this summer 2012 for a period of 6 to 8 weeks (between June 15th and August 15th). See attached announcement. > > I would also be grateful if you could let me know > - whether you might be, yourself, interested in teaching a course in the summer 2012; > - whether, although you are not free for the summer 2012, you would be interested in later opportunities; > - whether you would rather be deleted from my mailing list. > > There might be opportunities to teach in DCSIT at the undergraduate level for a full semester or even a year. If you are interested, please let me know. > > I take the opportunity of this email to thank those who already manifested their interest or even applied. If you already applied, you don't need to send your documents again, just let Steven Davis know that you would be free this summer. > > With all my thanks. I remain at your disposal for any further information. > > Sincerely yours > > Dominique Sotteau > previously DR CNRS, and later Head of international relation at INRIA, now retired. > +33 1 43 25 03 74 >

Dec. 11, 2011

STIC conference deadlines reminder

by Alan Knight

The Smalltalk Industry Conference 2012 is coming up March 19-21, and submission deadlines are coming up soon. This year there are two parts to the conference, so there could be some confusion. -*Smalltalk Industry Conference*: This is the traditional Smalltalk Solutions program. To submit, you just need summary information for the talk. The presentations are, at least sometimes, recorded, but there aren't published papers. The deadline for those submissions is VERY SOON -_December 15th_. Call for participation ishere <http://www.stic.st/2011/10/smalltalk-solutions-is-now-called-smalltalk-indu…>. -*Smalltalk Directions*: This is the academic part of the conference, new this year. It accepts academic papers, which will be refereed and a selection of which will be submitted to the Journal of Object Technology. The deadline for those submissions is_January 6th, 2012_. The call for participation ishere <http://www.stic.st/2011/11/smalltalk-directions-call-for-participation/>.

Dec. 8, 2011

Call for Participation in the Smalltalk Devroom at FOSDEM 2012.

by Stephan Eggermont

Call for Participation in the Smalltalk Devroom at FOSDEM 2012. "A devroom for the Pharo, Squeak, GST, Etoilé, Seaside, Moose Smalltalk projects. Smalltalk environments offer a very high development productivity, unmatched by their successors. Come do some pair programming with us and experience the advantages of a real OO environment." The meetup will take place Sunday, February 5, 2012, from 9AM until 5PM, room AW1.126. This room has 72 seats, a VGA video projector and wireless internet. More information will be available later. Proposals on content and format are welcome. People interested in running a session should announce that on the smalltalk-devroom mailing list, with the following information: - Their name - The project they are associated with - A short bio, to be put on the website along with their speaker name - (optionally) a picture of themselves - The title of their session (which will go on the website and in the booklet) - A abstract describing the session in further detail. - The desired length of the session. - The desired time slot in which they want to hold the session. Suggested values for the duration are 55min, 25min, 6m40 (Pecha Kucha). The desired time slot is meant to help you prevent conflicts with other dev rooms in which you might have a talk or your travel arrangements. The deadline for submissions is December 31, 23:00 GMT+1. Discussion takes place on the smalltalk-devroom(a)lists.fosdem.org mailing list. Please subscribe if you are interested: https://lists.fosdem.org/listinfo/smalltalk-devroom The local VUB/ULB Smalltalkers have been asked to organize a sprint/BSUG meeting on Saturday Februari 4. Devroom related URLs: http://www.pharo-project.org http://www.squeak.org/ http://etoileos.com/ http://www.seaside.st/ http://smalltalk.gnu.org/ Please distribute

Dec. 7, 2011

Call for Participation Smalltalk Directions

by Stéphane Ducasse

Hi guys I encourage you to send article to Smalltalk Directions Stef 19th–21st March 2012, Biloxi, Mississippi Smalltalk Directions is a refereed symposium that will be co-located with the Smalltalk Industry Conference (STIC) in March 2012. The Smalltalk Directions Symposium will run in parallel with STIC, offering a parallel track of presentations of refereed academic work that will be open to all attendees of STIC. We solicit research papers concerned with the future of the Smalltalk language, forward-looking applications of Smalltalk and Smalltalk-inspired languages, and the core technologies supporting such languages, including but not limited to: 1. Libraries & Frameworks 2. Language extensions and contractions 3. Implementation technologies, such as Virtual machines, compilers, instruction sets, garbage collection 4. Object persistence 5. Distributed objects 6. Program development tools and environments 7. Using Smalltalk to educate future object-oriented programmers 8. Design Patterns in and for Smalltalk 9. Modelling 10. Meta-programming 11. Domain-specific languages implemented in Smalltalk 12. Smalltalk on the web Both submissions and final papers must be prepared using the ACM SIGPLAN 10 point format. Templates for Word and LaTeX are available at http://www.acm.org/sigs/sigplan/authorInformation.htm; this site also contains links to useful information on how to write effective submissions. We are working to have accepted papers appear in the ACM Digital library. A special issue of the Journal of Object Technology will be published in conjunction with the symposium. The authors of selected papers will be invited to submit an extended version of their Smalltalk Directions submission to this special issue, which will then conduct its own reviewing precess. Papers must be submitted electronically using EasyChair (https://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=smalltalkdirections2) Important Dates Paper submission deadline 6th January 2012 Author notification 4th February 2012 Final version deadline 24th February 2012 Symposium 19th– 21st March 2012 Organizing Committee Andrew P Black Portland State University, USA black(a)cs.pdx.edu Ralph Johnson University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, USA rjohnson(a)illinois.edu Roger Whitney San Diego State University whitney(a)cs.sdsu.edu David West New Mexico Highlands University dmwest(a)nmhu.edu

Dec. 5, 2011

Re: [Esug-list] Call for your input on questions you ask yourselves during merge

by stephane ducasse

tx :) On Dec 3, 2011, at 11:23 AM, Johan Brichau wrote: > Hi all, > > A little late, but I still wanted to react to these questions. > > Besides the obvious question on 'what functionality does the change fix/add/remove?', I often find myself navigating and browsing code to answer the following questions: > > - Does the change remain confined to a module (this can be a package, class, …) or is it crosscutting ? > - What parts of the system are directly using the changed behavior? Is it a central part of the system with many dependents? > - Who was the owner of the code that was changed? Should another developer review these changes (i.e. the original author whose code was adapted) ? > - If the change is a refactoring, were all appropriate parts refactored and no inappropriate ones included? Are there other packages that would need to change as well to incorporate this change? > - Does the code (partially) reinvent the wheel? In essence: does it introduce code duplication or does it implement parts that are reimplementations of existing parts in the code base or existing libraries? > - How about the unit tests? Was there a new test? Were they adapted? Is the code in this change covered adequately ? > > I assume the verification of coding conventions, unit testing, etc… as a step of the integration process as well. > > I should also note that, in our case, every developer needs to integrate his work in the trunk himself. A first check is therefore done by the developer who is merging his changes in the trunk. This change in the trunk is afterwards verified with the questions above. This means that, at that time, problems related to parallel changes are practically non-existant (i.e. the developer who integrates needs to deal with those directly). Daily coordination amongst developers also reduces the possibility on conflicting parallel changes. Such a single branch development is feasible for us because we work with a single software version and excluding changes from the trunk is a very uncommon decision (bad changes need to be corrected appropriately instead of simply left out). > > best regards, > Johan > > On 27 Nov 2011, at 20:45, Tudor Girba wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Besides the questions you asked, I would be interested in how changes are grouped together. In particular, when merging the work of multiple authors with changes stacked on top of each other, I would like to be able to group the differences in different ways. For example: >> - I would like to be able to group them by author, or >> - I would like to group them by time (such that commits on different packages get closer together when they are committed closer in time). >> >> Cheers, >> Doru >> >> >> On 23 Nov 2011, at 16:57, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >> >>> Hi guys >>> >>> We are writing some articles on the work of veronica to support merging activities. We need your input great smalltalk community :) >>> What are the questions that you ask yourselves when you are/want to merge some code in your project? >>> We would like to do a compilation of questions and also evaluate how the solution of veronica solves them or part of them. >>> >>> Here are some typical questions we asked ourselves. >>> - What other changes did this change require? >>> - Can I integrate this change right now? >>> - How large it is? >>> - Who made it? >>> - Is it still valid (when I'm working on an old change)? >>> - Is this change impacted by a change that happened in another branch of my software? >>> >>> Stef D., Andy K. and Veronica U. >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Esug-list mailing list >>> Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org >>> http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "Don't give to get. Just give." >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Esug-list mailing list >> Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org >> http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org

Dec. 4, 2011

Re: [Esug-list] Call for your input on questions you ask yourselves during merge

by Johan Brichau

Hi all, A little late, but I still wanted to react to these questions. Besides the obvious question on 'what functionality does the change fix/add/remove?', I often find myself navigating and browsing code to answer the following questions: - Does the change remain confined to a module (this can be a package, class, …) or is it crosscutting ? - What parts of the system are directly using the changed behavior? Is it a central part of the system with many dependents? - Who was the owner of the code that was changed? Should another developer review these changes (i.e. the original author whose code was adapted) ? - If the change is a refactoring, were all appropriate parts refactored and no inappropriate ones included? Are there other packages that would need to change as well to incorporate this change? - Does the code (partially) reinvent the wheel? In essence: does it introduce code duplication or does it implement parts that are reimplementations of existing parts in the code base or existing libraries? - How about the unit tests? Was there a new test? Were they adapted? Is the code in this change covered adequately ? I assume the verification of coding conventions, unit testing, etc… as a step of the integration process as well. I should also note that, in our case, every developer needs to integrate his work in the trunk himself. A first check is therefore done by the developer who is merging his changes in the trunk. This change in the trunk is afterwards verified with the questions above. This means that, at that time, problems related to parallel changes are practically non-existant (i.e. the developer who integrates needs to deal with those directly). Daily coordination amongst developers also reduces the possibility on conflicting parallel changes. Such a single branch development is feasible for us because we work with a single software version and excluding changes from the trunk is a very uncommon decision (bad changes need to be corrected appropriately instead of simply left out). best regards, Johan On 27 Nov 2011, at 20:45, Tudor Girba wrote: > Hi, > > Besides the questions you asked, I would be interested in how changes are grouped together. In particular, when merging the work of multiple authors with changes stacked on top of each other, I would like to be able to group the differences in different ways. For example: > - I would like to be able to group them by author, or > - I would like to group them by time (such that commits on different packages get closer together when they are committed closer in time). > > Cheers, > Doru > > > On 23 Nov 2011, at 16:57, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> Hi guys >> >> We are writing some articles on the work of veronica to support merging activities. We need your input great smalltalk community :) >> What are the questions that you ask yourselves when you are/want to merge some code in your project? >> We would like to do a compilation of questions and also evaluate how the solution of veronica solves them or part of them. >> >> Here are some typical questions we asked ourselves. >> - What other changes did this change require? >> - Can I integrate this change right now? >> - How large it is? >> - Who made it? >> - Is it still valid (when I'm working on an old change)? >> - Is this change impacted by a change that happened in another branch of my software? >> >> Stef D., Andy K. and Veronica U. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Esug-list mailing list >> Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org >> http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Don't give to get. Just give." > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org

Dec. 3, 2011

Re: [Esug-list] ESUG Video upload continuing...

by Sean P. DeNigris

Marcus Denker-4 wrote > > I will add them to all the conference pages. > Thanks :) -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/ESUG-Video-upload-continuing-tp3877544p4128506.html Sent from the ESUG mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Dec. 1, 2011

Re: [Esug-list] ESUG Video upload continuing...

by Marcus Denker

On Nov 28, 2011, at 5:29 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > > Marcus Denker-4 wrote >> >> We are slowly, but steadily uploading videos to Youtube. >> > > Will someone add a link from the ESUG 2011 page (like the one for 2010). > The Playlists are: ESUG 2008: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL4A297B9019B3884D ESUG 2009: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL74E35D8EC7E756AE ESUG 2010: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL431285A978F581BB ESUG 2011: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL813665D04A2E4C0A I will add them to all the conference pages. -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de

Dec. 1, 2011

Re: [Esug-list] Call for your input on questions you ask yourselves during merge

by Stan Shepherd

Is this a fix to production? If so, has it also been backfilled to the development branch? ...Stan -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Call-for-your-input-on-questions-you-ask-yourselves-d… Sent from the ESUG mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Nov. 29, 2011

Re: [Esug-list] ESUG Video upload continuing...

by Sean P. DeNigris

Marcus Denker-4 wrote > > We are slowly, but steadily uploading videos to Youtube. > Will someone add a link from the ESUG 2011 page (like the one for 2010). Thanks. Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/ESUG-Video-upload-continuing-tp3877544p4115797.html Sent from the ESUG mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Nov. 28, 2011