- Esug-list - lists.esug.org

ESUG considers sponsoring the Pharo Consortium

by Hernan Wilkinson

Hi, the smalltalk community is very small, so there is always going to be a kind of "conflict of interest". ESUG has sponsored many projects in different flavors of smalltalk and for sure, in many of them, there was one or more members of the ESUG board and other boards or groups or companies and nobody cared... I don't think that this idea has a "hidden agenda", I mean, the money it is not going to go to any ESUG board member's pocket but to somebody that will help to have a better smalltalk. Also, for me the election process of the ESUG board was always clear, open and I could saw it with my own eyes, so I have no doubts there either. ESUG has helped a lot of people and organizations related with smalltalk, it would be a pitty not to do it with pharo. I see this action as a positive one, so I think it is a good idea. In any case, companies that give money to esug that could see this as a "threat" should be the one to complain but I have not seen any doing it so far. The Smalltalk comminiy is small (ironically), let's help each other! Let's be positive! Hernan Ps: thank you for being open and ask something you are not obligated to, that shows transparency, and please do not confuse clear proceses with lack of transparency, when you DO there is always somerhing you are going to DO wrong, but at least you did! On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Steven Kelly <stevek(a)metacase.com> wrote: > > Thanks for asking us. Personally I think it would be better for ESUG not to contribute financially to Pharo. In general, user groups don't contribute financially to the organizations which make the products in question - indeed, often it works the other way around, with the product organizations sponsoring user groups or their activities. > > I'm sure everyone would agree that any board members with a clear connection to Pharo should declare a conflict of interest on this issue, and refrain from discussion or voting. That's standard practice, and for good reason. Even when a board is completely open, honest, and declares even potentially perceived conflicts of interest, those outside the board will always be outsiders, and liable to feel not everything is being revealed - that's just human nature. > > It's great that the board is asking for our opinions, and I'm sure they'll make the best decision for ESUG. And whatever happens, I'm sure Pharo and other Smalltalks know ESUG is very much on their side. > > All the best, > Steve > PS useful advice on conflicts of interest for non-profits: > http://www.boardsource.org/Knowledge.asp?ID=3.389 > -- > Steven Kelly, CTO, MetaCase > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: esug-list-bounces(a)lists.esug.org [mailto:esug-list- > > bounces(a)lists.esug.org] On Behalf Of Damien Cassou > > Sent: 4. heinäkuuta 2012 18:02 > > To: ESUG Mailing list > > Subject: [Esug-list] ESUG considers sponsoring the Pharo Consortium > > > > The ESUG board currently considers sponsoring the Pharo Consortium > > (see http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/pharo-project/2012- > > June/066881.html). > > We believe that Pharo is important for the Smalltalk ecosystem. > > > > Note that ESUG is promoting Smalltalk in general and this action is in > > the same vein as previous actions such as sponsoring local Smalltalk > > groups (FAST, Catalan, Russian, ...), Smalltalk dialects > > (SqueakFoundation, etoy), development projects (Mars, DBXTalk, DrGeo > > II, SqueakVirtual Machine cleaning), and books (Seaside and GNU book). > > > > Before deciding, the board would like to gather feedback from the > > community. We want to be clear that there is a strict distinction > > between ESUG and Pharo (both consortium and association) even if some > > people are involved in both. > > > > What do you think? > > > > -- > > Damien Cassou > > http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st > > > > "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them > > popular by not having them." James Iry > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Esug-list mailing list > > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org > > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org -- Hernán Wilkinson Agile Software Development, Teaching & Coaching Phone: +54 - 011 - 4311 - 8404 Mobile: +54 - 911 - 4470 - 7207 email: hernan.wilkinson(a)10Pines.com site: http://www.10Pines.com Address: Paraguay 523, Floor 7 N, Buenos Aires, Argentina -- *Hernán Wilkinson Agile Software Development, Teaching & Coaching* *Phone: +54 - 011 - 4311 - 8404** Mobile: +54 - 911 - 4470 - 7207 email: hernan.wilkinson(a)10Pines.com site: http://www.10Pines.com <http://www.10pines.com/>* Address: Paraguay 523, Floor 7 N, Buenos Aires, Argentina

July 4, 2012

Re: [Esug-list] ESUG considers sponsoring the Pharo Consortium

by Michael Haupt

Damien, thanks - well noted. Let me reinforce that I do not question the intentions of anybody in particular. The personal overlaps between the two entities involved might be considered problematic, and I want to make up my mind. On 4 July 2012 23:32, Damien Cassou <damien.cassou(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Even though I'm unsure about your definition of "representatives of > communities", I don't see myself as being one, whatever the community > you pick. Say, if someone predominantly uses one particular flavour in their daily Smalltalking life, they'd be part of that flavour's community; and being on the board, representing it. > Now, if a representative of a community wants to work with > us, we would love to receive his application. In contrast to my earlier e-mail on process transparency, I have noticed that while the election itself is transparent, the path to being eligible in the first place is not. Is there actually such a thing as a call for applications when board members' terms end? Is there a nomination phase? A Q&A period to help people make up their minds? In short, how does this work? > Now, let's face it: 2 of the most active participants of the ESUG > board (Marcus and Stéphane) are leaders on the Pharo project. But we, > as a community, must not forget that both where among the most active > participants of Squeak before (I'm talking about code, organization, > presentations, books, ...). These two are very active for the > Smalltalk community and have been for quite some time now. If they > decide to quit the ESUG board (and we already talked about that among > members of the board), who will step up and do their job? Good question; see above. > My even more personal opinion: would it be fair not to help Pharo > create a consortium simply because some members are so prolific that > they can be very useful for two organizations at the same time? I > don't believe so and I vote for becoming a member of the Pharo > consortium just as much as I would vote for becoming a member of any > other Smalltalk consortium/association/organization/group/whatever. What amount is being considered? What percentage of the ESUG budget is that? Regards, Michael

July 4, 2012

Re: [Esug-list] ESUG considers sponsoring the Pharo Consortium

by Damien Cassou

Hi ESUG members, On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Michael Haupt <mhaupt(a)gmail.com> wrote: > how many people on the ESUG board can be considered representatives of > communities of Smalltalk dialects other than Pharo? here are the members of the ESUG's board: President: Stéphane Ducasse Treasurer: Luc Fabresse Damien Cassou Jordi Delgado Marcus Denker Alain Plantec Serge Stinckwich The rest of this email is my personal opinion and does not necessarily reflect the one of the board. Even though I'm unsure about your definition of "representatives of communities", I don't see myself as being one, whatever the community you pick. When I decided I wanted to join the board this was not to represent Smalltalk or Squeak, this was because I loved both and wanted to spend some time helping. I got elected by participants of the conference during the last talk, three years ago. I believe this is the same for most other members, i.e., we don't represent a particular Smalltalk, we just want to help and do some work for everyone. Now, if a representative of a community wants to work with us, we would love to receive his application. For 3 years now that I'm in this board, we received *a lot of* requests for sponsoring (being projects, participation to the conferences, books, articles, ...). If we didn't accept all requests, I think we are very very close. Most of the times, requests arrive in already a good shape, we see a great potential for the community or a real need, and we accept them. Sometimes, we ask people to work some more on the proposal and most of the time we will eventually accept them as well. I invite any interested Smalltalker out there to send founding proposals, we are always happy to help when we can. Now, let's face it: 2 of the most active participants of the ESUG board (Marcus and Stéphane) are leaders on the Pharo project. But we, as a community, must not forget that both where among the most active participants of Squeak before (I'm talking about code, organization, presentations, books, ...). These two are very active for the Smalltalk community and have been for quite some time now. If they decide to quit the ESUG board (and we already talked about that among members of the board), who will step up and do their job? I think each of them spends roughly 1h per day (probably more than that) on ESUG tasks: preparing the conference, taking care of legal issues, administrating the web servers, taking care of requests for sponsoring... Not so funny jobs. They both prefer coding, believe me. I don't see anyone else in the current board who could do their job and we didn't receive any application to join the board for at least 3 years. Finally, the board decided to raise this issue with you today for 1 reason: we are aware of the conflict of interest! We want your opinion about founding a particular dialect that shares some active participants with the board itself. But while giving your opinion please remember one thing: ESUG did help other communities in the past and we will continue to do it. My even more personal opinion: would it be fair not to help Pharo create a consortium simply because some members are so prolific that they can be very useful for two organizations at the same time? I don't believe so and I vote for becoming a member of the Pharo consortium just as much as I would vote for becoming a member of any other Smalltalk consortium/association/organization/group/whatever. Best regards, -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them popular by not having them." James Iry

July 4, 2012

Re: [Esug-list] ESUG considers sponsoring the Pharo Consortium

by Joachim Tuchel

Thanks, Steve, I couldn't make my point clearer than you did. It's great ESUG is there, and it's great that Pharo is pushing on Smalltalk the way and at the pace it does. It's good that both ESUG and Pharo are here and we all benefit a lot from both of them, as we do from other Smalltalk vendors' work and open source projects. I am not aware of the detailed financial situation of ESUG, but I would prefer to see things like multi-platform Smalltalk projects being supported/sponsored by ESUG. The multi-platform nature should be a high priority. Not all Smalltalkers can freely choose what dialect they use, and one of the goals of ESUG is (or should be) to help get all Smalltalkers in closer touch and make the Smalltalk worl a better place for all of us. So, if there is some yearly program in which the community can choose a project or platform to be supported financially, why not also support the Pharo Consortium? But also help Amber, GST, Seaside or whatever project in anotrher year. I am glad people are volunteering for the ESUG board, and I am grateful for the organizers of the ESUG conference and all the other good stuff ESUG is doing. I am also happy about the drive behind Pharo. But these are two pairs of shoes. Joachim Am 04.07.12 22:25, schrieb Steven Kelly: > Thanks for asking us. Personally I think it would be better for ESUG not to contribute financially to Pharo. In general, user groups don't contribute financially to the organizations which make the products in question - indeed, often it works the other way around, with the product organizations sponsoring user groups or their activities. > > I'm sure everyone would agree that any board members with a clear connection to Pharo should declare a conflict of interest on this issue, and refrain from discussion or voting. That's standard practice, and for good reason. Even when a board is completely open, honest, and declares even potentially perceived conflicts of interest, those outside the board will always be outsiders, and liable to feel not everything is being revealed - that's just human nature. > > It's great that the board is asking for our opinions, and I'm sure they'll make the best decision for ESUG. And whatever happens, I'm sure Pharo and other Smalltalks know ESUG is very much on their side. > > All the best, > Steve > PS useful advice on conflicts of interest for non-profits: > http://www.boardsource.org/Knowledge.asp?ID=3.389 > -- > Steven Kelly, CTO, MetaCase > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: esug-list-bounces(a)lists.esug.org [mailto:esug-list- >> bounces(a)lists.esug.org] On Behalf Of Damien Cassou >> Sent: 4. heinäkuuta 2012 18:02 >> To: ESUG Mailing list >> Subject: [Esug-list] ESUG considers sponsoring the Pharo Consortium >> >> The ESUG board currently considers sponsoring the Pharo Consortium >> (see http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/pharo-project/2012- >> June/066881.html). >> We believe that Pharo is important for the Smalltalk ecosystem. >> >> Note that ESUG is promoting Smalltalk in general and this action is in >> the same vein as previous actions such as sponsoring local Smalltalk >> groups (FAST, Catalan, Russian, ...), Smalltalk dialects >> (SqueakFoundation, etoy), development projects (Mars, DBXTalk, DrGeo >> II, SqueakVirtual Machine cleaning), and books (Seaside and GNU book). >> >> Before deciding, the board would like to gather feedback from the >> community. We want to be clear that there is a strict distinction >> between ESUG and Pharo (both consortium and association) even if some >> people are involved in both. >> >> What do you think? >> >> -- >> Damien Cassou >> http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st >> >> "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them >> popular by not having them." James Iry >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Esug-list mailing list >> Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org >> http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org > > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org > -- --  -----------------------------------------------------------------------  Objektfabrik Joachim Tuchel mailto:jtuchel@objektfabrik.de  Fliederweg 1 http://www.objektfabrik.de D-71640 Ludwigsburg http://joachimtuchel.wordpress.com Telefon: +49 7141 56 10 86 0 Fax: +49 7141 56 10 86 1

July 4, 2012

Re: [Esug-list] ESUG considers sponsoring the Pharo Consortium

by Steven Kelly

Thanks for asking us. Personally I think it would be better for ESUG not to contribute financially to Pharo. In general, user groups don't contribute financially to the organizations which make the products in question - indeed, often it works the other way around, with the product organizations sponsoring user groups or their activities. I'm sure everyone would agree that any board members with a clear connection to Pharo should declare a conflict of interest on this issue, and refrain from discussion or voting. That's standard practice, and for good reason. Even when a board is completely open, honest, and declares even potentially perceived conflicts of interest, those outside the board will always be outsiders, and liable to feel not everything is being revealed - that's just human nature. It's great that the board is asking for our opinions, and I'm sure they'll make the best decision for ESUG. And whatever happens, I'm sure Pharo and other Smalltalks know ESUG is very much on their side. All the best, Steve PS useful advice on conflicts of interest for non-profits: http://www.boardsource.org/Knowledge.asp?ID=3.389 -- Steven Kelly, CTO, MetaCase > -----Original Message----- > From: esug-list-bounces(a)lists.esug.org [mailto:esug-list- > bounces(a)lists.esug.org] On Behalf Of Damien Cassou > Sent: 4. heinäkuuta 2012 18:02 > To: ESUG Mailing list > Subject: [Esug-list] ESUG considers sponsoring the Pharo Consortium > > The ESUG board currently considers sponsoring the Pharo Consortium > (see http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/pharo-project/2012- > June/066881.html). > We believe that Pharo is important for the Smalltalk ecosystem. > > Note that ESUG is promoting Smalltalk in general and this action is in > the same vein as previous actions such as sponsoring local Smalltalk > groups (FAST, Catalan, Russian, ...), Smalltalk dialects > (SqueakFoundation, etoy), development projects (Mars, DBXTalk, DrGeo > II, SqueakVirtual Machine cleaning), and books (Seaside and GNU book). > > Before deciding, the board would like to gather feedback from the > community. We want to be clear that there is a strict distinction > between ESUG and Pharo (both consortium and association) even if some > people are involved in both. > > What do you think? > > -- > Damien Cassou > http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st > > "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them > popular by not having them." James Iry > > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org

July 4, 2012

Re: [Esug-list] ESUG considers sponsoring the Pharo Consortium

by Michael Haupt

Alex, let me clarify my point in response to yours. You say that project X applied for sponsoring, and the board considers this now. That is completely OK. It just so happens that it might well be that (worst case) 100 % of the ESUG board members are also project X community members (some of them even in positions that could fairly be called leadership positions). In that case, the decision of the board would - whatever the outcome - be biased due to a conflict of interest, and a decision in favour of project X would have a strong smell of nepotism. Hence my original question. Which still has not been answered. Before I can give an answer to Damien's (the ESUG board's) question, I need to know that to come to a conclusion. Your initial response to my question does not count as an answer: I did not want to engage in any philosophical discussions about ideal worlds, I did not want to start any flame wars or make ESUG board members leave this list. Not. My. Plan. Preferably, I'd like to know which communities are actually represented by the body that leads / governs / whatevers this community-spanning organisation. Best, Michael

July 4, 2012

Re: [Esug-list] ESUG considers sponsoring the Pharo Consortium

by Alexandre Bergel

[ this is my personal opinion. I may be wrong, but I do not think so ] > I do not see a compelling reason why Pharo should be supported in such a way by ESUG and not GST, Squeak, Cuis, or any other open source Smalltalk implementation. There is no reason. Pharo will get a sponsor because people behind Pharo asked for it, in the same way that people behind GST asked. > The money could certainly be used by the other projects for activities like going to and presenting at the ESUG conferences which is often not done for lack of funding. If ESUG wants to sponsor open source Smalltalk dialects by handing out money directly, it should do so fairly and transparently and not favor a single fork of a single dialect. I am pretty sure that if the Squeak community, or any other community set up a nice and reasonable proposal, the esug board will consider it. This discussion reminds me a large project that got founded recently in Chile. Everybody said they are interested in participating (and receiving money), but only a very few actually made up a clear, concise and promising proposal. Not that they were not included in the discussion and the regular meetings. The persons who did not receive the money "were too busy to write the proposal". Well... at the end they complained saying that it is not fair. Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

July 4, 2012

Re: [Esug-list] ESUG considers sponsoring the Pharo Consortium

by Michael Haupt

Hi, On 4 July 2012 18:36, Rob Vens <rob.vens(a)reflektis.com> wrote: > Ho ho this is not the proper place to discuss this. The ESUG board selection has always been done quite openly, but on the yearly conference, there is not even ground for any suspition, please. that is completely correct: the boards are elected by acclamation (usually) when the community is gathered at the conference. IMHO this is as transparent as it gets. Nothing to complain there. Well, yes, the procedure *could* be mentioned on the web page, but the process is OK. Best, Michael

July 4, 2012

Re: [Esug-list] ESUG considers sponsoring the Pharo Consortium

by Rob Vens

Ho ho this is not the proper place to discuss this. The ESUG board selection has always been done quite openly, but on the yearly conference, there is not even ground for any suspition, please. Andreas could you please discuss this with the board first before venting this on the open mailing list? Op 4 jul. 2012 om 18:14 heeft Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> het volgende geschreven: > I left Squeak because I was "pissed away". > > I have no problem to leave ESUG, too. > > herewith I unsubscribe from the ESUG list. > > Have Fun > > Marcus > > > On Jul 4, 2012, at 6:13 PM, Andreas Raab wrote: > >> >>> -------- Original-Nachricht -------- >>> Datum: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 17:33:12 +0200 >>> Von: Alexandre Bergel <abergel(a)dcc.uchile.cl> >>> An: Michael Haupt <mhaupt(a)gmail.com> >>> CC: ESUG Mailing list <esug-list(a)lists.esug.org> >>> Betreff: Re: [Esug-list] ESUG considers sponsoring the Pharo Consortium >>> >>> >>> Hi Michael! >>> >>> Good to see you back! >>> >>>> how many people on the ESUG board can be considered representatives of >>>> communities of Smalltalk dialects other than Pharo? >>> >>> In an ideal World, this would be indeed important. >>> However the amount of people willing to actively participate in the ESUG board is really small. >> Really? I don't recall anyone ever asking. In fact, the whole election process of the ESUG board is a complete mystery to me personally. Googling "ESUG board election" nets me a message from 2002(!) about an upcoming election, that's it. Compare this say, with googling "Squeak board election" and you will find election results each year, plus each candidates announcement, discussions, vote counts etc. A bit more transparency would certainly help here... >> >> Regarding the original question, I think such a membership is unfair to the other open source communities. Sponsoring of specific projects with the goal of fostering the overall Smalltalk community is one thing, paying a perpetual "Pharo tax" quite another. I do not see a compelling reason why Pharo should be supported in such a way by ESUG and not GST, Squeak, Cuis, or any other open source Smalltalk implementation. The money could certainly be used by the other projects for activities like going to and presenting at the ESUG conferences which is often not done for lack of funding. If ESUG wants to sponsor open source Smalltalk dialects by handing out money directly, it should do so fairly and transparently and not favor a single fork of a single dialect. >> >> Cheers, >> - Andreas >> >> >>> >>> And being a small community should not prevent us from moving ahead. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Alexandre >>> -- >>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Esug-list mailing list >>> Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org >>> http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org >> _______________________________________________ >> Esug-list mailing list >> Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org >> http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de > > > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org

July 4, 2012

Re: [Esug-list] ESUG considers sponsoring the Pharo Consortium

by Dave Mason

On 2012-Jul-4, at 12:13 , Andreas Raab wrote: > If ESUG wants to sponsor open source Smalltalk dialects by handing out money directly, it should do so fairly and transparently and not favor a single fork of a single dialect. +1 ../Dave

July 4, 2012