- Esug-list - lists.esug.org

[JOB] Pharo Engineer, IoT

by Marcus Denker

Engineer Position 1 year ========================= INRIA RMoD and the Pharo Consortium are looking for a full-time engineer for helping with developing Pharo. The focus of this job is "Pharo on embedded and mobile devices for the internet of things". - Embedded Pharo on ARM The currently available class of ARM devices (BeagleBone, Raspberry PI) are a very interesting platform for Pharo. The engineer should strengthen the existing efforts to get Pharo working on these platforms. - Pharo on Android Improve the support of Android devices. With Pharo6, we will migrate to a complete new design and implementation of UI, Windowing and graphics. The engineer will work on making these features available on Android devices. - Pharo itself The engineer is expected to be actively involved in helping to improve the infrastructure that the Pharo community used (CI server for continues integration, interplay with issue tracking) and to actively help with day-to-day bug fixing. We are looking for a candidate with some prior experience with Pharo - Knowledge in Dynamic Languages - Experience with mobile development is a plus - English Work in a research lab, but no paper writing, no teaching, no administration. In addition: - centrally located (one hour from Paris, 1h20 from London, 35 min from Brussels) - try a lot of good beer (our office is just 10km from the border to Belgium) - Program with Pharo all day! Lille is an active city but not expensive (lot of students...), centrally located with good connections by train to everywhere (including CDG and Brussels airports). Duration: 12 month Starting date: as soon as possible (Spring 2016) Salary: 2600-3200 euros brut / month, depending on experience Location: Lille (no remote job possible) More about Pharo: http://www.pharo.org INRIA RMOD: http://rmod.lille.inria.fr INRIA Lille: http://www.inria.fr/lille/ INRIA in General: http://www.inria.fr Lille: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lille http://wikitravel.org/en/Lille Do not hesitate to contact us for more information.

Dec. 12, 2015

[JOB] Pharo Engineer, Infrastructure

by marcus.denker＠inria.fr

Engineer Position 1 year + 1 year ========================== INRIA RMoD and the Pharo Consortium are looking for a full-time engineer for helping with developing Pharo and the infrastructure around it. The focus of this job is the infrastructure that Pharo provides to external projects as well as the infrastructure we use to develop Pharo itself. - Infrastructure for external projects Pharo is used in many contexts: an ever growing number of frameworks are contributed by the community. Pharo already provides CI infrastructure, but what is missing is the automatic check of collections of frameworks and libraries. We want to provides validated "distributions" focussing on certain tasks, for example Pharo for Web development. - Pharo and Git Pharo has some support for using Git. The goal is to improve the support of git and other versioning systems. - Pharo itself The engineer is expected to be actively involved in helping to improve the infrastructure that the Pharo community uses (CI server for continues integration, interplay with issue tracking) and to actively help with day-to-day bug fixing. We are looking for a candidate with prior experience with Pharo and possibly some background in continuous integration: - Knowledge in Dynamic Languages - Continuous integration and deployment - English Work in a research lab, but no paper writing, no teaching, no administration. In addition: - Centrally located (one hour from Paris, 1h20 from London, 35 min from Brussels) - Try a lot of good beer (our office is just 10km from the border to Belgium) - Program with Pharo all day! Lille is an active city but not expensive (lot of students...), centrally located with good connections by train to everywhere (including CDG and Brussels airports). Duration: 12 + 12 months Starting date: Feb or March 2016 Salary: 2600-3200 euros brut / month, depending on experience Location: Lille (no remote job possible) More about Pharo: http://www.pharo.org INRIA RMOD: http://rmod.lille.inria.fr INRIA Lille: http://www.inria.fr/lille/ INRIA in General: http://www.inria.fr Lille: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lille http://wikitravel.org/en/Lille Do not hesitate to contact us for more information.

Dec. 12, 2015

PhD Opening in Refactoring

by Goubier Thierry

Hi all, I have an opening on a PhD subject on refactoring for embedded software (start 10/2016), with a 6 month internship before, at CEA List, in collaboration with INRIA RMOD (Stéphane Ducasse has been very nice to agree to be the thesis co-supervisor). The PhD title is : 'Reuse of embedded sofware code artefacts by Refactoring' and concern itself with the evolution of embedded software when targeting new parallel embedded platforms or evaluation platforms, and how this can be expressed and supported by domain-specific Refactorings. It will take in account how software gets rewritten to target high performance embedded platforms, exposing highly advanced architectures (parallel and very high efficiency) and advanced software optimizations, and how this work should be expressed and supported by adequate refactorings. The internship is about starting the PhD with a sample study of the changes undertaken by embedded software code when it is evaluated and re-architectured/optimized in industrial projects undertaken by the laboratory. Both take place at CEA List, LCE lab, in Saclay (SW of Paris), in a laboratory known for its research in simulation of Systems on Chip (SoC), SoC design, compilation for manycores, and neural networks architectures. CEA is a fair employer for internships and PhD students, with a higher than average salary and significant benefits. Interested candidates should contact me or Stéphane Ducasse, Regards, Thierry -- Thierry Goubier CEA List DACLE/LIST/LCE 91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex France Phone/Fax: +33 (0) 1 69 08 32 92 / 83 95 http://www-list.cea.fr/index.php/en/technological-research/research-program…

Dec. 3, 2015

Re: [Esug-list] IWST '15 is now in the ACM DL

by Steven Kelly

Thanks Ralph. Even if authors give copyright to ACM, they can still publish on their web page and in preproceedings. I think you'll find that a vanishingly small percentage of people in industry have access to the ACM DL through their companies. I understand that publishing in the DL or similar repositories is useful for discoverability, and I can cope with the fact that those companies need to make money and so use paywalls. But please, all authors, if the publisher allows it and you want your research to be taken up by people in the real world, take the trouble to put a PDF on your web page. Cheers, Steve ________________________________ From: rjohnson.uiuc(a)gmail.com on behalf of Ralph Johnson Sent: Sat 28/11/2015 00:47 To: Steven Kelly Cc: ESUG Mailing list Subject: Re: [Esug-list] IWST '15 is now in the ACM DL The difference is that ACM does not hold the copyright on the papers. Instead, they were given the right to publish them, but authors keep the copyright on the papers. Thus, the authors are able to publish them in other venues, such as their own website. The ACM Digital Library is really designed for ACM members. You don't have to pay for individual articles if you are a member, you get to see all of them. Most CS professors are members. Universities can also be members, and then all the students can access the DL. I bet big companies like IBM are also members and so their employees can access the DL. The DL doesn't work so well for people in smaller companies, since neither they nor their employer are members of the ACM. So, when a conference wants to appeal to people in smaller companies, it is important to make sure that when you negotiate the contract with the ACM, you make sure that the copyright remains with the author, not with ACM. That permits you to put the papers on a web site elsewhere. -Ralph On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Steven Kelly <stevek(a)metacase.com> wrote: Ralph, Could you clarify that? I just went to the ACM DL for PLoP, and all the PLoP, EuroPloP and SugarloafPloP papers I tried were behind a paywall, $15 each. That's the same price as for the OOPSLA/SPLASH Domain-Specific Modeling Workshops, where IIRC authors sign away their copyright to ACM (but we link preprints from the workshop web page). All the best, Steve From: Esug-list [mailto:esug-list-bounces@lists.esug.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Johnson Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 5:08 PM To: Marcus Denker Cc: ESUG Mailing list Subject: Re: [Esug-list] IWST '15 is now in the ACM DL In fact, ACM is easier to deal with than you might think. If you are just putting a proceedings into the DL, and not making a print version of it, you can ask them to allow copyright to stay with the authors. We did this for the PLoP series of conferences. -Ralph Johnson On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > On 26 Nov 2015, at 09:14, Alexandre Bergel <abergel(a)dcc.uchile.cl> wrote: > > Hi Christian, > > I understand your frustration. However this is how it work as soon as one wish to publish to a wide audience. Unfortunately, there is not much we can do in that respect. > This is the current "System" of research... of course the Authors nor the universities that payed a salary for doing the research will get any money... just the leeches that did *nothing*. It is a truly shitty system and worthy to be fought against, but this is hard if you ever want to get a job or graduate. But there are activities against it... progress is slow... but e.g. ECOOP left all this and the publications are now online for free. So what people do to make it less of a problem is that they publish a "preprint" that is free to download. Preprints are on the websites of the authors (of they care) or in the central archive of the institution (if it cares). Inria (where I work) got so far that as of 2 years ago, publication that are not available for free on https://hal.inria.fr <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__hal.inria.fr&d=BQMGaQ&c =8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=1b7HP4jiYqv2J9GhsFL1RVTPCo7Df2jBmDU6HdJUM3Y&m=8VG3A mMXAGg19Z_lS5xwKI6Zmn-437r0JmMUnujR9gE&s=YKY_KurHUOUidRnScrot6S-4sr0pHRNf3ft8 58igaeo&e=> do not counted for any Inria internal metric. As far as Inria is concerned, they do not exist. E.g we are not allowed to put it in official reports or claim them when applying for internal promotion. As for IWST: there is a link here: http://www.esug.org/wiki/pier/Conferences/2015/International-Workshop-IWST_… <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.esug.org_wiki_pier_C onferences_2015_International-2DWorkshop-2DIWST-5F15&d=BQMGaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za 5rBPlktOQ&r=1b7HP4jiYqv2J9GhsFL1RVTPCo7Df2jBmDU6HdJUM3Y&m=8VG3AmMXAGg19Z_lS5x wKI6Zmn-437r0JmMUnujR9gE&s=xdcS9yQ9TGOYvmRhXVvz7HWVTt4qMOr0HuT5S-b2tXQ&e=> (I will upload them to http://www.esug.org/data/ESUG2015/ <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.esug.org_data_ESUG20 15_&d=BQMGaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=1b7HP4jiYqv2J9GhsFL1RVTPCo7Df2jBmDU6H dJUM3Y&m=8VG3AmMXAGg19Z_lS5xwKI6Zmn-437r0JmMUnujR9gE&s=Xqdfjr3ibQqW8n3Gqwigrm b3ZmqWuIeNQIDfjTLnRPc&e=> later today) Marcus . _______________________________________________ Esug-list mailing list Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.esug.org_mailman_l istinfo_esug-2Dlist-5Flists.esug.org&d=BQMGaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=1b7H P4jiYqv2J9GhsFL1RVTPCo7Df2jBmDU6HdJUM3Y&m=8VG3AmMXAGg19Z_lS5xwKI6Zmn-437r0JmM UnujR9gE&s=TQYE-RxGAc_Y8ZywFiWFQcaRlofdYm1F-r-7H8Lbeuw&e=>

Nov. 29, 2015

Re: [Esug-list] IWST '15 is now in the ACM DL

by Boris Shingarov

What happened to the IWST'14 proceedings? I can't find them in the DL. (Yes, I know where they are on the ESUG site; but, you know, there are certain benefits to having the ACM search index them).

Nov. 29, 2015

Re: [Esug-list] Does anyone remember details of a "pro-Smalltalk" merger circa 2013?

by Richard Sargent

EuanM wrote > Did this jog loose any memories for anyone? Yes. It was Chris Thorgrimsson of Lam Research. At ESUG 2011, he talked of their acquisition of Novellus. Ultimately, team size did not matter in the technology choice, and after all was said and done, the ratio was closer to 2:1. -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Does-anyone-remember-details-of-a-pro-Smalltalk-merge… Sent from the ESUG mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Nov. 28, 2015

Re: [Esug-list] IWST '15 is now in the ACM DL

by Andres Valloud

http://authors.acm.org/main.html On 11/27/15 14:47 , Ralph Johnson wrote: > The difference is that ACM does not hold the copyright on the papers. > Instead, they were given the right to publish them, but authors keep the > copyright on the papers. Thus, the authors are able to publish them in > other venues, such as their own website. > > The ACM Digital Library is really designed for ACM members. You don't > have to pay for individual articles if you are a member, you get to see > all of them. Most CS professors are members. Universities can also be > members, and then all the students can access the DL. I bet big > companies like IBM are also members and so their employees can access > the DL. > > The DL doesn't work so well for people in smaller companies, since > neither they nor their employer are members of the ACM. So, when a > conference wants to appeal to people in smaller companies, it is > important to make sure that when you negotiate the contract with the > ACM, you make sure that the copyright remains with the author, not with > ACM. That permits you to put the papers on a web site elsewhere. > > -Ralph > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Steven Kelly <stevek(a)metacase.com > <mailto:stevek@metacase.com>> wrote: > > Ralph,____ > > __ __ > > Could you clarify that? I just went to the ACM DL for PLoP, and all > the PLoP, EuroPloP and SugarloafPloP papers I tried were behind a > paywall, $15 each. That’s the same price as for the OOPSLA/SPLASH > Domain-Specific Modeling Workshops, where IIRC authors sign away > their copyright to ACM (but we link preprints from the workshop web > page).____ > > __ __ > > All the best,____ > > Steve____ > > __ __ > > *From:*Esug-list [mailto:esug-list-bounces@lists.esug.org > <mailto:esug-list-bounces@lists.esug.org>] *On Behalf Of *Ralph Johnson > *Sent:* Thursday, November 26, 2015 5:08 PM > *To:* Marcus Denker > *Cc:* ESUG Mailing list > *Subject:* Re: [Esug-list] IWST '15 is now in the ACM DL____ > > __ __ > > In fact, ACM is easier to deal with than you might think. If you > are just putting a proceedings into the DL, and not making a print > version of it, you can ask them to allow copyright to stay with the > authors. We did this for the PLoP series of conferences. ____ > > __ __ > > -Ralph Johnson____ > > __ __ > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Marcus Denker > <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr <mailto:marcus.denker@inria.fr>> wrote:____ > > > > On 26 Nov 2015, at 09:14, Alexandre Bergel <abergel(a)dcc.uchile.cl > <mailto:abergel@dcc.uchile.cl>> wrote: > > > > Hi Christian, > > > > I understand your frustration. However this is how it work as > soon as one wish to publish to a wide audience. Unfortunately, there > is not much we can do in that respect. > > > > This is the current “System” of research… of course the Authors nor > the universities that payed a salary for doing the research > will get any money… just the leeches that did *nothing*. It is a > truly shitty system and worthy to be fought against, but this is > hard if you ever want to get a job or graduate. But there are > activities against it… progress is slow… but e.g. ECOOP left all > this and the publications are now online for free. > > So what people do to make it less of a problem is that they publish > a “preprint” that is free to download. Preprints are > on the websites of the authors (of they care) or in the central > archive of the institution (if it cares). > > Inria (where I work) got so far that as of 2 years ago, publication > that are not available for free on https://hal.inria.fr > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__hal.inria.fr&d=BQMGaQ&…> > do not counted for > any Inria internal metric. As far as Inria is concerned, they do not > exist. E.g we are not allowed to put it in official reports or claim > them when applying for internal promotion. > > As for IWST: there is a link here: > http://www.esug.org/wiki/pier/Conferences/2015/International-Workshop-IWST_… > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.esug.org_wiki_pier_…> > (I will upload them to http://www.esug.org/data/ESUG2015/ > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.esug.org_data_ESUG2…> > later today) > > Marcus > > > > . > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org <mailto:Esug-list@lists.esug.org> > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.esug.org_mailman_…>____ > > __ __ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org >

Nov. 28, 2015

Re: [Esug-list] IWST '15 is now in the ACM DL

by stephane ducasse

Yes and people do that and can publish on the hal open-archive. We just forgot. Stef On 27 Nov 2015, at 23:47, Ralph Johnson <johnson(a)cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > The difference is that ACM does not hold the copyright on the papers. Instead, they were given the right to publish them, but authors keep the copyright on the papers. Thus, the authors are able to publish them in other venues, such as their own website. > > The ACM Digital Library is really designed for ACM members. You don't have to pay for individual articles if you are a member, you get to see all of them. Most CS professors are members. Universities can also be members, and then all the students can access the DL. I bet big companies like IBM are also members and so their employees can access the DL. > > The DL doesn't work so well for people in smaller companies, since neither they nor their employer are members of the ACM. So, when a conference wants to appeal to people in smaller companies, it is important to make sure that when you negotiate the contract with the ACM, you make sure that the copyright remains with the author, not with ACM. That permits you to put the papers on a web site elsewhere. > > -Ralph > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Steven Kelly <stevek(a)metacase.com> wrote: > Ralph, > > > > Could you clarify that? I just went to the ACM DL for PLoP, and all the PLoP, EuroPloP and SugarloafPloP papers I tried were behind a paywall, $15 each. That’s the same price as for the OOPSLA/SPLASH Domain-Specific Modeling Workshops, where IIRC authors sign away their copyright to ACM (but we link preprints from the workshop web page). > > > > All the best, > > Steve > > > > From: Esug-list [mailto:esug-list-bounces@lists.esug.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Johnson > Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 5:08 PM > To: Marcus Denker > Cc: ESUG Mailing list > Subject: Re: [Esug-list] IWST '15 is now in the ACM DL > > > > In fact, ACM is easier to deal with than you might think. If you are just putting a proceedings into the DL, and not making a print version of it, you can ask them to allow copyright to stay with the authors. We did this for the PLoP series of conferences. > > > > -Ralph Johnson > > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > > > On 26 Nov 2015, at 09:14, Alexandre Bergel <abergel(a)dcc.uchile.cl> wrote: > > > > Hi Christian, > > > > I understand your frustration. However this is how it work as soon as one wish to publish to a wide audience. Unfortunately, there is not much we can do in that respect. > > > > This is the current “System” of research… of course the Authors nor the universities that payed a salary for doing the research > will get any money… just the leeches that did *nothing*. It is a truly shitty system and worthy to be fought against, but this is > hard if you ever want to get a job or graduate. But there are activities against it… progress is slow… but e.g. ECOOP left all > this and the publications are now online for free. > > So what people do to make it less of a problem is that they publish a “preprint” that is free to download. Preprints are > on the websites of the authors (of they care) or in the central archive of the institution (if it cares). > > Inria (where I work) got so far that as of 2 years ago, publication that are not available for free on https://hal.inria.fr do not counted for > any Inria internal metric. As far as Inria is concerned, they do not exist. E.g we are not allowed to put it in official reports or claim > them when applying for internal promotion. > > As for IWST: there is a link here: http://www.esug.org/wiki/pier/Conferences/2015/International-Workshop-IWST_… > (I will upload them to http://www.esug.org/data/ESUG2015/ later today) > > Marcus > > > > . > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org

Nov. 28, 2015

Re: [Esug-list] Does anyone remember details of a "pro-Smalltalk" merger circa 2013?

by EuanM

Did this jog loose any memories for anyone? This was very unusual - normally the manager with the biggest department ends up being the most influential. Luckily, Smalltalk remains a more productive environment. Unluckily, this means we are generally going to be the smaller department in these situations. -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Does-anyone-remember-details-of-a-pro-Smalltalk-merge… Sent from the ESUG mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Nov. 27, 2015

Re: [Esug-list] IWST '15 is now in the ACM DL

by Ralph Johnson

The difference is that ACM does not hold the copyright on the papers. Instead, they were given the right to publish them, but authors keep the copyright on the papers. Thus, the authors are able to publish them in other venues, such as their own website. The ACM Digital Library is really designed for ACM members. You don't have to pay for individual articles if you are a member, you get to see all of them. Most CS professors are members. Universities can also be members, and then all the students can access the DL. I bet big companies like IBM are also members and so their employees can access the DL. The DL doesn't work so well for people in smaller companies, since neither they nor their employer are members of the ACM. So, when a conference wants to appeal to people in smaller companies, it is important to make sure that when you negotiate the contract with the ACM, you make sure that the copyright remains with the author, not with ACM. That permits you to put the papers on a web site elsewhere. -Ralph On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Steven Kelly <stevek(a)metacase.com> wrote: > Ralph, > > > > Could you clarify that? I just went to the ACM DL for PLoP, and all the > PLoP, EuroPloP and SugarloafPloP papers I tried were behind a paywall, $15 > each. That’s the same price as for the OOPSLA/SPLASH Domain-Specific > Modeling Workshops, where IIRC authors sign away their copyright to ACM > (but we link preprints from the workshop web page). > > > > All the best, > > Steve > > > > *From:* Esug-list [mailto:esug-list-bounces@lists.esug.org] *On Behalf Of > *Ralph Johnson > *Sent:* Thursday, November 26, 2015 5:08 PM > *To:* Marcus Denker > *Cc:* ESUG Mailing list > *Subject:* Re: [Esug-list] IWST '15 is now in the ACM DL > > > > In fact, ACM is easier to deal with than you might think. If you are > just putting a proceedings into the DL, and not making a print version of > it, you can ask them to allow copyright to stay with the authors. We did > this for the PLoP series of conferences. > > > > -Ralph Johnson > > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> > wrote: > > > > On 26 Nov 2015, at 09:14, Alexandre Bergel <abergel(a)dcc.uchile.cl> > wrote: > > > > Hi Christian, > > > > I understand your frustration. However this is how it work as soon as > one wish to publish to a wide audience. Unfortunately, there is not much we > can do in that respect. > > > > This is the current “System” of research… of course the Authors nor the > universities that payed a salary for doing the research > will get any money… just the leeches that did *nothing*. It is a truly > shitty system and worthy to be fought against, but this is > hard if you ever want to get a job or graduate. But there are activities > against it… progress is slow… but e.g. ECOOP left all > this and the publications are now online for free. > > So what people do to make it less of a problem is that they publish a > “preprint” that is free to download. Preprints are > on the websites of the authors (of they care) or in the central archive of > the institution (if it cares). > > Inria (where I work) got so far that as of 2 years ago, publication that > are not available for free on https://hal.inria.fr > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__hal.inria.fr&d=BQMGaQ&…> > do not counted for > any Inria internal metric. As far as Inria is concerned, they do not > exist. E.g we are not allowed to put it in official reports or claim > them when applying for internal promotion. > > As for IWST: there is a link here: > http://www.esug.org/wiki/pier/Conferences/2015/International-Workshop-IWST_… > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.esug.org_wiki_pier_…> > (I will upload them to http://www.esug.org/data/ESUG2015/ > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.esug.org_data_ESUG2…> > later today) > > Marcus > > > > . > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.esug.org_mailman_…> > > >

Nov. 27, 2015