March 2020 - Esug-list - lists.esug.org

Re: [Esug-list] destructDo:

by Christian Haider

Hi Tim, I think that the „as” is essential and asArgsIn: would read as nice… Von: Esug-list <esug-list-bounces(a)lists.esug.org> Im Auftrag von Tim Mackinnon Gesendet: Sonntag, 29. März 2020 16:24 An: esug-list(a)lists.esug.org Betreff: Re: [Esug-list] destructDo: Agree with intention revealing - #argumentsIn: would contract it a bit more (not sure the as strictly needed as we aren’t returning a result). And #argsIn: might be a bit too concise. Like this proposal though. Tim On Sun, 29 Mar 2020, at 2:28 PM, Helge Nowak via Esug-list wrote: intention revealing trumps brevity Am Sonntag, 29. März 2020, 00:58:49 MEZ hat Christian Haider <christian.haider(a)smalltalked-visuals.com <mailto:christian.haider@smalltalked-visuals.com> > Folgendes geschrieben: Not bad! Captures the semantics nicely. Just a bit long Von: Esug-list <esug-list-bounces(a)lists.esug.org <mailto:esug-list-bounces@lists.esug.org> > Im Auftrag von Bert Freudenberg Gesendet: Sonntag, 29. März 2020 00:12 An: esug-list(a)lists.esug.org <mailto:esug-list@lists.esug.org> Betreff: Re: [Esug-list] destructDo: On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 11:27 AM Pape, Tobias <Tobias.Pape(a)hpi.de <mailto:Tobias.Pape@hpi.de> > wrote: What about ^stringsOfLine asComponentsIn: [:ignore :string2 :string3 :string4 | self produktbereich: string2 profitcenter: string3 bezeichnung: string4] ? Best regards -Tobias Agreed, "...In:" is better than "...Do" because the latter implies iteration in Smalltalk. (never mind ifNotNilDo: which broke the convention) And since block arguments are called "arguments" how about aCollection asArgumentsIn: [:arg1 :arg2 :arg3 | ... ] - Bert - PS: Happy Covid Bike Shedding ;) _______________________________________________ Esug-list mailing list Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org <mailto:Esug-list@lists.esug.org> http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org _______________________________________________ Esug-list mailing list Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org <mailto:Esug-list@lists.esug.org> http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org

March 29, 2020

Re: [Esug-list] destructDo:

by Christian Haider

Hello Martin, You are right, but I disagree :). It started by using #valueWithArguments: more often. I find it very bulky, hard to format nicely and difficult to read. This is because the block is the receiver. As last argument, the world looks brighter, because at the end the block formats better. Compare: ^aList asArgumentsIn: [:a :b :c | | x y | x := a send: b with: c. y := ‘multiline block’. x printString, y] with: ^[:a :b :c | | x y | x := a send: b with: c. y := ‘multiline block’. x printString, y ] valueWithArguments: aList I see the second pattern used in two subsystems in VW, one also uses #cull… Maybe I find it more difficult to read the second pattern, because the argument list is very far away from the list it associates with. I think that I will settle with #asArgumentsIn: and see how it reads in real life. As a shortcut, I can imagine an operator… (too bad that VW doesn’t support Unicode for operators…) Thank you! Von: Esug-list <esug-list-bounces(a)lists.esug.org> Im Auftrag von Martin McClure Gesendet: Sonntag, 29. März 2020 17:50 An: Bruce Badger <bwbadger(a)gmail.com>; Tim Mackinnon <tim(a)testit.works> Cc: esug-list(a)lists.esug.org Members <esug-list(a)lists.esug.org> Betreff: Re: [Esug-list] destructDo: After thinking about this message some more, it seemed to me that it was easier to come up with a good intention-revealing name if the block were the receiver and the array were the argument. It would be some kind of #valueWithArguments: selector. So I looked to see whether there was already such a thing, and sure enough, in Pharo there is #valueWithPossibleArgs:. #valueWithPossibleArgs: will accept arrays (and I hope any SequenceableCollection) of any size -- trimming the end off if too large, padding with nils if too short. On the principle of "if it's easy to come up with a good name, the design is probably pretty good" could this possibly be a better solution? Regards, -Martin On 3/29/20 7:50 AM, Bruce Badger wrote: We write code once, but read it many times. Given the relatively few times I would be using this (rather nice) thing, I'd be happy to type the full: asArgumentsIn: Christian, congratulations on coming up with something to get us all thinking and talking. Good timing too :-/ Very best wishes, Bruce On Sun, 29 Mar 2020 at 15:24, Tim Mackinnon <mailto:tim@testit.works> <tim(a)testit.works> wrote: Agree with intention revealing - #argumentsIn: would contract it a bit more (not sure the as strictly needed as we aren’t returning a result). And #argsIn: might be a bit too concise. Like this proposal though. Tim On Sun, 29 Mar 2020, at 2:28 PM, Helge Nowak via Esug-list wrote: intention revealing trumps brevity Am Sonntag, 29. März 2020, 00:58:49 MEZ hat Christian Haider <christian.haider(a)smalltalked-visuals.com <mailto:christian.haider@smalltalked-visuals.com> > Folgendes geschrieben: Not bad! Captures the semantics nicely. Just a bit long Von: Esug-list <esug-list-bounces(a)lists.esug.org <mailto:esug-list-bounces@lists.esug.org> > Im Auftrag von Bert Freudenberg Gesendet: Sonntag, 29. März 2020 00:12 An: esug-list(a)lists.esug.org <mailto:esug-list@lists.esug.org> Betreff: Re: [Esug-list] destructDo: On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 11:27 AM Pape, Tobias <Tobias.Pape(a)hpi.de <mailto:Tobias.Pape@hpi.de> > wrote: What about ^stringsOfLine asComponentsIn: [:ignore :string2 :string3 :string4 | self produktbereich: string2 profitcenter: string3 bezeichnung: string4] ? Best regards -Tobias Agreed, "...In:" is better than "...Do" because the latter implies iteration in Smalltalk. (never mind ifNotNilDo: which broke the convention) And since block arguments are called "arguments" how about aCollection asArgumentsIn: [:arg1 :arg2 :arg3 | ... ] - Bert - PS: Happy Covid Bike Shedding ;) _______________________________________________ Esug-list mailing list Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org <mailto:Esug-list@lists.esug.org> http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org _______________________________________________ Esug-list mailing list Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org <mailto:Esug-list@lists.esug.org> http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org _______________________________________________ Esug-list mailing list Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org <mailto:Esug-list@lists.esug.org> http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org _______________________________________________ Esug-list mailing list Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org <mailto:Esug-list@lists.esug.org> http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org

March 29, 2020

Re: [Esug-list] destructDo:

by Bert Freudenberg

If you’re looking for a short selector that doesn’t reveal meaning by using more words, I would borrow a term that is used elsewhere, like your “destructure”. Various programming language communities have terms like “expand”, “unpack”, “spread”, or “splat” for using a sequence as separate arguments. Maybe “spread” would work? - Bert - On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 16:58 Christian Haider < christian.haider(a)smalltalked-visuals.com> wrote: > Not bad! Captures the semantics nicely. > > Just a bit long > > > > *Von:* Esug-list <esug-list-bounces(a)lists.esug.org> *Im Auftrag von *Bert > Freudenberg > *Gesendet:* Sonntag, 29. März 2020 00:12 > *An:* esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > *Betreff:* Re: [Esug-list] destructDo: > > > > On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 11:27 AM Pape, Tobias <Tobias.Pape(a)hpi.de> wrote: > > What about > > ^stringsOfLine asComponentsIn: [:ignore :string2 :string3 :string4 > | > self produktbereich: string2 profitcenter: string3 > bezeichnung: string4] > > ? > > Best regards > -Tobias > > > > Agreed, "...In:" is better than "...Do" because the latter implies > iteration in Smalltalk. (never mind ifNotNilDo: which broke the convention) > > > > And since block arguments are called "arguments" how about > > > > aCollection asArgumentsIn: [:arg1 :arg2 :arg3 | ... ] > > > > - Bert - > > > > PS: Happy Covid Bike Shedding ;) > -- -- Dr. Bert Freudenberg 7275 Franklin Avenue #210 Los Angeles CA 90046 +1 (818) 482-3991

March 29, 2020

Re: [Esug-list] destructDo:

by Martin McClure

After thinking about this message some more, it seemed to me that it was easier to come up with a good intention-revealing name if the block were the receiver and the array were the argument. It would be some kind of #valueWithArguments: selector. So I looked to see whether there was already such a thing, and sure enough, in Pharo there is #valueWithPossibleArgs:. #valueWithPossibleArgs: will accept arrays (and I hope any SequenceableCollection) of any size -- trimming the end off if too large, padding with nils if too short. On the principle of "if it's easy to come up with a good name, the design is probably pretty good" could this possibly be a better solution? Regards, -Martin On 3/29/20 7:50 AM, Bruce Badger wrote: > We write code once, but read it many times. Given the relatively few > times I would be using this (rather nice) thing, I'd be happy to type > the full: > > asArgumentsIn: > > Christian, congratulations on coming up with something to get us all > thinking and talking. Good timing too :-/ > > Very best wishes, > Bruce > > On Sun, 29 Mar 2020 at 15:24, Tim Mackinnon <tim(a)testit.works> wrote: > > Agree with intention revealing - #argumentsIn: would contract it a > bit more (not sure the as strictly needed as we aren’t returning a > result). And #argsIn: might be a bit too concise. > > Like this proposal though. > > Tim > > On Sun, 29 Mar 2020, at 2:28 PM, Helge Nowak via Esug-list wrote: >> >> intention revealing trumps brevity >> >> Am Sonntag, 29. März 2020, 00:58:49 MEZ hat Christian Haider >> <christian.haider(a)smalltalked-visuals.com >> <mailto:christian.haider@smalltalked-visuals.com>> Folgendes >> geschrieben: >> >> >> Not bad! Captures the semantics nicely. >> >> Just a bit long >> >> >> >> *Von:* Esug-list <esug-list-bounces(a)lists.esug.org >> <mailto:esug-list-bounces@lists.esug.org>> *Im Auftrag von *Bert >> Freudenberg >> *Gesendet:* Sonntag, 29. März 2020 00:12 >> *An:* esug-list(a)lists.esug.org <mailto:esug-list@lists.esug.org> >> *Betreff:* Re: [Esug-list] destructDo: >> >> >> >> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 11:27 AM Pape, Tobias <Tobias.Pape(a)hpi.de >> <mailto:Tobias.Pape@hpi.de>> wrote: >> >> >> What about >> >> ^stringsOfLine asComponentsIn: [:ignore :string2 >> :string3 :string4 | >> self produktbereich: string2 profitcenter: >> string3 bezeichnung: string4] >> >> ? >> >> Best regards >> -Tobias >> >> >> >> Agreed, "...In:" is better than "...Do" because the latter >> implies iteration in Smalltalk. (never mind ifNotNilDo: which >> broke the convention) >> >> >> And since block arguments are called "arguments" how about >> >> >> aCollection asArgumentsIn: [:arg1 :arg2 :arg3 | ... ] >> >> >> - Bert - >> >> >> PS: Happy Covid Bike Shedding ;) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Esug-list mailing list >> Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org <mailto:Esug-list@lists.esug.org> >> http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org >> _______________________________________________ >> Esug-list mailing list >> Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org <mailto:Esug-list@lists.esug.org> >> http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org >> > > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org <mailto:Esug-list@lists.esug.org> > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org

March 29, 2020

Re: [Esug-list] destructDo:

by Bruce Badger

We write code once, but read it many times. Given the relatively few times I would be using this (rather nice) thing, I'd be happy to type the full: asArgumentsIn: Christian, congratulations on coming up with something to get us all thinking and talking. Good timing too :-/ Very best wishes, Bruce On Sun, 29 Mar 2020 at 15:24, Tim Mackinnon <tim(a)testit.works> wrote: > Agree with intention revealing - #argumentsIn: would contract it a bit > more (not sure the as strictly needed as we aren’t returning a result). And > #argsIn: might be a bit too concise. > > Like this proposal though. > > Tim > > On Sun, 29 Mar 2020, at 2:28 PM, Helge Nowak via Esug-list wrote: > > > intention revealing trumps brevity > > Am Sonntag, 29. März 2020, 00:58:49 MEZ hat Christian Haider < > christian.haider(a)smalltalked-visuals.com> Folgendes geschrieben: > > > Not bad! Captures the semantics nicely. > > Just a bit long > > > > > *Von:* Esug-list <esug-list-bounces(a)lists.esug.org> *Im Auftrag von *Bert > Freudenberg > *Gesendet:* Sonntag, 29. März 2020 00:12 > *An:* esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > *Betreff:* Re: [Esug-list] destructDo: > > > > > On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 11:27 AM Pape, Tobias <Tobias.Pape(a)hpi.de> wrote: > > > What about > > ^stringsOfLine asComponentsIn: [:ignore :string2 :string3 :string4 > | > self produktbereich: string2 profitcenter: string3 > bezeichnung: string4] > > ? > > Best regards > -Tobias > > > > > Agreed, "...In:" is better than "...Do" because the latter implies > iteration in Smalltalk. (never mind ifNotNilDo: which broke the convention) > > > > And since block arguments are called "arguments" how about > > > > aCollection asArgumentsIn: [:arg1 :arg2 :arg3 | ... ] > > > > - Bert - > > > > PS: Happy Covid Bike Shedding ;) > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org >

March 29, 2020

Re: [Esug-list] destructDo:

by Tim Mackinnon

Agree with intention revealing - #argumentsIn: would contract it a bit more (not sure the as strictly needed as we aren’t returning a result). And #argsIn: might be a bit too concise. Like this proposal though. Tim On Sun, 29 Mar 2020, at 2:28 PM, Helge Nowak via Esug-list wrote: > > intention revealing trumps brevity > > Am Sonntag, 29. März 2020, 00:58:49 MEZ hat Christian Haider <christian.haider(a)smalltalked-visuals.com> Folgendes geschrieben: > > > Not bad! Captures the semantics nicely. > Just a bit long > > > *Von:* Esug-list <esug-list-bounces(a)lists.esug.org> *Im Auftrag von *Bert Freudenberg > *Gesendet:* Sonntag, 29. März 2020 00:12 > *An:* esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > *Betreff:* Re: [Esug-list] destructDo: > > > On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 11:27 AM Pape, Tobias <Tobias.Pape(a)hpi.de> wrote: >> >> What about >> >> ^stringsOfLine asComponentsIn: [:ignore :string2 :string3 :string4 | >> self produktbereich: string2 profitcenter: string3 bezeichnung: string4] >> >> ? >> >> Best regards >> -Tobias >> > > Agreed, "...In:" is better than "...Do" because the latter implies iteration in Smalltalk. (never mind ifNotNilDo: which broke the convention) > > And since block arguments are called "arguments" how about > > aCollection asArgumentsIn: [:arg1 :arg2 :arg3 | ... ] > > - Bert - > > PS: Happy Covid Bike Shedding ;) > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org >

March 29, 2020

Re: [Esug-list] destructDo:

by Helge Nowak

intention revealing trumps brevity Am Sonntag, 29. März 2020, 00:58:49 MEZ hat Christian Haider <christian.haider(a)smalltalked-visuals.com> Folgendes geschrieben: Not bad! Captures the semantics nicely. Just a bit long Von: Esug-list <esug-list-bounces(a)lists.esug.org> Im Auftrag von Bert Freudenberg Gesendet: Sonntag, 29. März 2020 00:12 An: esug-list(a)lists.esug.org Betreff: Re: [Esug-list] destructDo: On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 11:27 AM Pape, Tobias <Tobias.Pape(a)hpi.de> wrote: What about ^stringsOfLine asComponentsIn: [:ignore :string2 :string3 :string4 | self produktbereich: string2 profitcenter: string3 bezeichnung: string4] ? Best regards -Tobias Agreed, "...In:" is better than "...Do" because the latter implies iteration in Smalltalk. (never mind ifNotNilDo: which broke the convention) And since block arguments are called "arguments" how about aCollection asArgumentsIn: [:arg1 :arg2 :arg3 | ... ] - Bert - PS: Happy Covid Bike Shedding ;) _______________________________________________ Esug-list mailing list Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org

March 29, 2020

Re: [Esug-list] destructDo:

by Christian Haider

Not bad! Captures the semantics nicely. Just a bit long Von: Esug-list <esug-list-bounces(a)lists.esug.org> Im Auftrag von Bert Freudenberg Gesendet: Sonntag, 29. März 2020 00:12 An: esug-list(a)lists.esug.org Betreff: Re: [Esug-list] destructDo: On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 11:27 AM Pape, Tobias <Tobias.Pape(a)hpi.de <mailto:Tobias.Pape@hpi.de> > wrote: What about ^stringsOfLine asComponentsIn: [:ignore :string2 :string3 :string4 | self produktbereich: string2 profitcenter: string3 bezeichnung: string4] ? Best regards -Tobias Agreed, "...In:" is better than "...Do" because the latter implies iteration in Smalltalk. (never mind ifNotNilDo: which broke the convention) And since block arguments are called "arguments" how about aCollection asArgumentsIn: [:arg1 :arg2 :arg3 | ... ] - Bert - PS: Happy Covid Bike Shedding ;)

March 28, 2020

Re: [Esug-list] destructDo:

by Bert Freudenberg

On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 11:27 AM Pape, Tobias <Tobias.Pape(a)hpi.de> wrote: > What about > > ^stringsOfLine asComponentsIn: [:ignore :string2 :string3 :string4 > | > self produktbereich: string2 profitcenter: string3 > bezeichnung: string4] > > ? > > Best regards > -Tobias > Agreed, "...In:" is better than "...Do" because the latter implies iteration in Smalltalk. (never mind ifNotNilDo: which broke the convention) And since block arguments are called "arguments" how about aCollection asArgumentsIn: [:arg1 :arg2 :arg3 | ... ] - Bert - PS: Happy Covid Bike Shedding ;)

March 28, 2020

Re: [Esug-list] destructDo:

by Johannes Brauer

Hello Christian, the hint to Lisp is obvious. In Clojure (a modern Lisp-Dialect) destructuring (https://clojure.org/guides/destructuring) is used a lot. Johannes Am 28.03.2020 um 15:23 schrieb Christian Haider <christian.haider(a)smalltalked-visuals.com<mailto:christian.haider@smalltalked-visuals.com>>: I chose the name because of the old Lisp “destructuring-bind”. But this is more powerful, because it does tree matching. This is just shallow. I am not sure where the concept was invented first. It may have been Lisp. Von: Norbert Hartl <norbert(a)hartl.name<mailto:norbert@hartl.name>> Gesendet: Samstag, 28. März 2020 14:20 An: Mark Plas <mark.plas(a)mediagenix.tv<mailto:mark.plas@mediagenix.tv>> Cc: Christian Haider <christian.haider(a)smalltalked-visuals.com<mailto:christian.haider@smalltalked-visuals.com>>; vwnc(a)cs.uiuc.edu<mailto:vwnc@cs.uiuc.edu>; esug-list(a)lists.esug.org<mailto:esug-list@lists.esug.org>; amber-lang(a)googlegroups.com<mailto:amber-lang@googlegroups.com> Betreff: Re: [Esug-list] destructDo: I think the name destructDo: comes from destructuring assignment. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Operators… Norbert Am 28.03.2020 um 14:15 schrieb Mark Plas <mark.plas(a)mediagenix.tv<mailto:mark.plas@mediagenix.tv>>: Hello Christian, " I don’t really like the name," Maybe you could call it #tupleDo:? #(1 2 3) tupleDo: [:a :b :c | …] Mark Mark Plas Software Engineer T +32 2 467 34 30 mark.plas(a)mediagenix.tv<mailto:mark.plas@mediagenix.tv> <logomgxnew_3d44337b-2535-4d6a-9f5f-3fdd565513ca.png> Nieuwe Gentsesteenweg 21/1<https://www.google.com/maps/dir/?api=1&destination=50.872900,4.286429> 1702 Groot-Bijgaarden - Belgium<https://www.google.com/maps/dir/?api=1&destination=50.872900,4.286429> <linkedin_75b9c4f1-6a2b-497c-aab8-df56fe16b8e3.png><https://nl.linkedin.com/company/mediagenix-ng> <twitter_de4c3300-c6ab-4898-a962-b33ff662a322.png><https://twitter.com/mediagenix_tv><Facebook-icon_6bef7545-f54e-4548-bfc4-1f07407f2642.png><https://www.facebook.com/MEDIAGENIX/>www.mediagenix.tv<http://www.mediagenix.tv/> Directions to MEDIAGENIX<http://www.mediagenix.tv/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Directions.pdf> This e-mail and any files attached to it are confidential and intended only for the use of the individuals or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. From: Esug-list <esug-list-bounces(a)lists.esug.org<mailto:esug-list-bounces@lists.esug.org>> On Behalf Of Christian Haider Sent: zaterdag 28 maart 2020 13:43 To: vwnc(a)cs.uiuc.edu<mailto:vwnc@cs.uiuc.edu>; esug-list(a)lists.esug.org<mailto:esug-list@lists.esug.org>; amber-lang(a)googlegroups.com<mailto:amber-lang@googlegroups.com> Subject: [Esug-list] destructDo: Hi, I am using a nice little method #destructDo: for a while now and it feels good. In VisualWorks: SequenceableCollection>>destructDo: aBlock "Evaluate aBlock with the receiver's elements as parameters. aBlock takes its arguments from the receiver. 'ok' #(1 2 3) destructDo: [:a :b :c | a + b + c] #(1 2 3) destructDo: [:a :b | a + b] #(1 2 3) destructDo: [:a | a] #(1 2 3) destructDo: [42] 'not ok' #(1 2 3) destructDo: [:a :b :c :d | a + b + c + d] " ^aBlock cullWithArguments: self asArray In Amber: SequenceableCollection>>destructDo: aBlock ^aBlock valueWithPossibleArguments: self In Pharo and other dialects, I don’t know, but should be as easy. For example you can do (('2020-03-28' tokensBasedOn: $-) collect: #asNumber) destructDo: [:year :month :day | Date newDay: day monthNumber: month year: year] I like that the block is not the receiver (like with #valueWithArguments or #cullWithArguments), but the last argument. Now the questions: * I am sure that others came up with this. Anybody knows? * What are you using for this pattern? * I don’t really like the name, but haven’t found anything better yet. Maybe #destructedDo: or just #destructed: or: #withPartsDo:… maybe something shorter? Ideas? * What are you thinking about this? Happy hacking, Christian _______________________________________________ Esug-list mailing list Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org<mailto:Esug-list@lists.esug.org> http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org _______________________________________________ Esug-list mailing list Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org<mailto:Esug-list@lists.esug.org> http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org

March 28, 2020