February 2014 - Esug-list - lists.esug.org

Re: [Esug-list] The truth on GSOC, ESUG and bad attitude

by Johan Fabry

+1 on this. On Feb 10, 2014, at 9:14 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote: > I support it, too. > > The only path to action I see is to act. And in this situation, Paolo was the only one that offered a pragmatic way out. Thank you, Paolo! :) > > So, I suggest this: > - we take Marcus' suggestion and have the present issue be handled at the next ESUG general assembly. Like this we ensure that the problem is going to be addressed in a more effective environment (namely, more structured, and not via mail). > - we go forward with Paolo as an admin. Like this we ensure that action happens now. > > Cheers, > Doru > > > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I support this, along with a general require that you keep this discussion in private. > > Esteban > > On 10 Feb 2014, at 12:10, Stephan Eggermont <stephan(a)stack.nl> wrote: > > > I no longer have confidence in Janko running as GSoC admin > > and want Paolo to take over as admin for Esug as mentoring organisation. > > > > Stephan Eggermont > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Esug-list mailing list > > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org > > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Every thing has its own flow" > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org ---> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org <--- Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry PLEIAD lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile

Feb. 10, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] The truth on GSOC, ESUG and bad attitude

by Tudor Girba

I support it, too. The only path to action I see is to act. And in this situation, Paolo was the only one that offered a pragmatic way out. Thank you, Paolo! :) So, I suggest this: - we take Marcus' suggestion and have the present issue be handled at the next ESUG general assembly. Like this we ensure that the problem is going to be addressed in a more effective environment (namely, more structured, and not via mail). - we go forward with Paolo as an admin. Like this we ensure that action happens now. Cheers, Doru On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com>wrote: > I support this, along with a general require that you keep this discussion > in private. > > Esteban > > On 10 Feb 2014, at 12:10, Stephan Eggermont <stephan(a)stack.nl> wrote: > > > I no longer have confidence in Janko running as GSoC admin > > and want Paolo to take over as admin for Esug as mentoring organisation. > > > > Stephan Eggermont > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Esug-list mailing list > > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"

Feb. 10, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] The truth on GSOC, ESUG and bad attitude

by Esteban Lorenzano

I support this, along with a general require that you keep this discussion in private. Esteban On 10 Feb 2014, at 12:10, Stephan Eggermont <stephan(a)stack.nl> wrote: > I no longer have confidence in Janko running as GSoC admin > and want Paolo to take over as admin for Esug as mentoring organisation. > > Stephan Eggermont > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org

Feb. 10, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] The truth on GSOC, ESUG and bad attitude

by Stephan Eggermont

I no longer have confidence in Janko running as GSoC admin and want Paolo to take over as admin for Esug as mentoring organisation. Stephan Eggermont

Feb. 10, 2014

The truth on GSOC, ESUG and bad attitude

by Janko Mivšek

Dne 10. 02. 2014 11:08, piše Stéphane Ducasse: > Janko CAN YOU STOP! > > "blatantly unethical behavior” > Really > > Stef Stef, we are waiting to you. Will you tell us your part of the story about your GSoC 2010 act or shall I start by myself? Janko >> Phil, >> This matter is actually very important for Smalltalk community, >> because it exposes nontransparent, meddling behind the scenes, >> and in some cases blatantly unethical behavior of some ESUG board >> members. Which is certainly bad for our community on long term. >> Such matters need to be clarified and some conclusions to be made for a >> community to preserve health and go on. Otherwise you are drowning into >> murky waters more and more. >> >> Best regards >> Janko >> >> Dne 10. 02. 2014 09:12, piše phil(a)highoctane.be >> <mailto:phil@highoctane.be>: >>> Guys, >>> >>> From the outside it just looks like a couple of spoiled kids battling in >>> the kindergarten. >>> >>> All of this is not moving Smalltalk and Pharo any single bit forward. >>> Backwards, there is a fair chance. >>> >>> Now, could you take this discussion elsewhere? Pick up a phone and talk. >>> >>> Who cares if anyone is right? Oh yeah, EUR 4K, what a huge amount to >>> fight over for an European org... (rolleyes). >>> >>> Phil >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Luc Fabresse <luc.fabresse(a)gmail.com >>> <mailto:luc.fabresse@gmail.com> >>> <mailto:luc.fabresse@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Janko, >>> >>> I do not have all numbers at hand now but in 2013 there were 4 >>> extra-GSOC but we paid only 3 because one student gave >>> up (Jean-Baptiste Beuzelin). >>> So yes you are probably right that it remains money if we integrate >>> last year BUT we were willing to spend it. >>> >>> Luc >>> >>> >>> 2014-02-09 Janko Mivšek <janko.mivsek(a)eranova.si >>> <mailto:janko.mivsek@eranova.si> >>> <mailto:janko.mivsek@eranova.si>>: >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> First to Luc: from your numbers it is clear that you are not to be >>> blamed on anything, because you were obviously misinformed and >>> misguided. >>> >>> Facts namely are: >>> >>> 1. GSoC mentors decided to pay extra stipendiums 3000 USD [1] >>> while >>> ESUG without approval paid 2000 more, 5000 USD, without any >>> report >>> back to GSoC mentors, >>> >>> 2. GSoC mentors decided to add past GSoC2012 amount to the >>> pool for >>> paying extra projects [2][3]. >>> >>> Calculation (without the Summit expenses) therefore is: >>> >>> Income: GSoC 2012 13x 500 = 6.500 USD >>> GSoC 2013 13x 500 = 6.500 USD >>> ------------------------------ >>> 13.000 USD >>> >>> Expenses: >>> Extra stipendiums: 3x 3.000 = 9.000 USD >>> >>> Difference: + 4.000 USD >>> >>> If ESUG would follow the decisions of GSoC mentors it wouldn't >>> loose any >>> money but gain 4.000 USD. >>> >>> Those that misinformed and misguided you needs therefore to >>> apologize to >>> you Luc, to the GSoC mentors and to me as admin! >>> >>> Janko >>> >>> [1] >>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/Yrlj8dIgGPg >>> [2] >>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/WwnxpkXzAB8 >>> [3] >>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/tR44jdPT5Hw >>> >>> >>> Dne 09. 02. 2014 17:26, piše Luc Fabresse: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> ------------ >>>> FACTS >>>> >>>> As you all know, I am the ESUG treasurer. >>>> So please find the numbers attached for the ESUG support of GSOC >>>> projects in 2013. >>>> >>>> ESUG sponsored 3 "extra-GSOC" meaning extra slots not accepted >>> by Google. >>>> In the file it is: Alejandro Infante, Pablo Estefo and >>> Benjamin Arezki. >>>> >>>> All in all we paid: >>>> - 3695EUR (~5000USD at that time i.e. same cost as a regular >>> GSOC) each >>>> projects >>>> - Serge trip to Mentor summit >>>> >>>> And we received 5552EUR from Google >>>> >>>> so yes we lost ~6582EUR >>>> That is easy 13*500 USD would only cover 1 plain extra-Gsoc and we >>>> sponsorized 3. >>>> >>>> I also think that it is important to send someone to the GSoc >>> mentor >>>> summit because it participates to the fact that Google >>> recognizes ESUG >>>> ang gives slots the next year. >>>> >>>> It is alos important to note dates. >>>> ESUG paid first and then has been refund by Google. >>>> It would not be possible to do it without ESUG. >>>> >>>> ------------ >>>> FROM HERE, MY POINT OF VIEW ON THIS STORY: >>>> >>>> As some of you know, I doing the ESUG treasury stuff on my >>> *own* time >>>> and it takes a lot! >>>> I am doing it because I strongly believe that Smalltalk (all >>> falvors!) >>>> is a really great language that should be more widespread. >>>> >>>> I also completely open to discussions. >>>> The ESUG board can also explain its actions and even money status. >>>> I can do errors too. >>>> So if Janko wants some details on GSOC related money, JUST ASK! >>>> >>>> I cannot admit that: >>>> >>>> - Janko wrote about some money accusation. This is directly >>> directed >>>> against the treasurer so me. >>>> And honestly, just reading again that I am biased and that I >>> hide or >>>> steal money make me think that I should better quit. >>>> >>>> - Janko asked for apologies! what is that? even if I would >>> have done a >>>> mistake (and ESUG did not loose money), YOU STILL MUST THANK >>> ME for >>>> DOING THIS BORING TASK! and then I can correct mistakes if any >>>> >>>> - People wants an answer fast, this conversation started >>> yesterday and I >>>> am spending my week-end with my kids >>>> >>>> >>>> I am really fed up with this kind of attitude. >>>> Stop accuse, better ask, discuss and we will solve the >>> problems together >>>> if any. >>>> But I think it will never happen... >>>> >>>> #Luc >>>> The disgusted Treasurer of ESUG who will finish his week-end >>> in bad mood -- Janko Mivšek Smalltalk GSoC Admin Team

Feb. 10, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] Pharo Weekly

by Tudor Girba

Excellent! Thanks, Doru On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr > wrote: > Hi guys > > I started a blog about pharo for those that do not want to read 1000 mails > to get information :) > > http://pharoweekly.wordpress.com/ > > > Spread the word > > Stef > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"

Feb. 10, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] It makes my toes curl

by Tudor Girba

Thank you, Reinout :) Doru On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Reinout Heeck <reinout(a)soops.nl> wrote: > > dear Smalltalk promoters, > I have too many friends that are in a divorce with kids in the picture. > > I have an understanding with them: they can talk (rant) to me about > anything regarding their divorce, but not in public and not at parties. > > > > So this stuff: > >> Now, I want to have details about your message. What do you mean by >> "blatantly unethical behavior"? At which point have we been unethical? >> > > please take it to a private place, not at this party. > > > > And this stuff: > > Cc: "smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com" > <smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com>, > The general-purpose Squeak developers list > <squeak-dev(a)lists.squeakfoundation.org>, > Pharo Development List <pharo-dev(a)lists.pharo.org>, > "phil(a)highoctane.be" <phil(a)highoctane.be>, > ESUG Mailing list <esug-list(a)lists.esug.org>, > pharo-users <pharo-users(a)lists.pharo.org> > > > is like my friends yelling at night keeping half the street awake. > > > > It makes my toes curl in shame, > please -pretty please- tune it down. > > > > > Reinout > ----- > > > > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"

Feb. 10, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] [Pharo-dev] [gsoc-mentors] The truth on GSOC, ESUG and bad attitude

by Marcus Denker

On 10 Feb 2014, at 11:08, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > >> Phil, >> >> This matter is actually very important for Smalltalk community, because >> it exposes nontransparent, meddling behind the scenes, and in some cases >> blatantly unethical behavior of some ESUG board members. Which is >> certainly bad for our community on long term. > > > > Janko CAN YOU STOP! > > "blatantly unethical behavior” > Really > I propose we do at the next ESUG the following: - the general assembly sets up and vote for a small group (3-5 people?) - they look into the issues - then report back to the general assembly It will of course been taken care that this gremium is independed. Because via email this is really not going to work. Marcus

Feb. 10, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] [Pharo-dev] [gsoc-mentors] The truth on GSOC, ESUG and bad attitude

by Stéphane Ducasse

Paolo we are > blatantly unethical behavior so we cannot do more. Stef >> Paolo >> >> I did not discuss yet with the ESUG board but we are sick of all this. >> Can you really run the GSOC this year administratively because I think >> that ESUG should stop to be a bank for it? >> I think that Janko is getting off. We cannot work with a person like >> that. I will make us lose too much energy. >> Like that the mentors will be free to do whatever they want to do. > > Stef, > > please calm down. I *hope* that you wanted to make this mail private. Public mailing lists are not the right place for this language, much less with such a wide crosspost. > > I already mentioned that all I care about is to have students funded by Google and working in Smalltalk. ESUG will get $500 per student, and can use them to send more people to the mentor summit or whatever else they prefer---I don't want to have *anything* to do with how ESUG spends their GSoC money. > > Paolo > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Smalltalk GSoC mentors" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to smalltalk-gsoc-mentors+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Feb. 10, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] [Pharo-dev] [gsoc-mentors] The truth on GSOC, ESUG and bad attitude

by Stéphane Ducasse

> Phil, > > This matter is actually very important for Smalltalk community, because > it exposes nontransparent, meddling behind the scenes, and in some cases > blatantly unethical behavior of some ESUG board members. Which is > certainly bad for our community on long term. Janko CAN YOU STOP! "blatantly unethical behavior” Really Stef > > Such matters need to be clarified and some conclusions to be made for a > community to preserve health and go on. Otherwise you are drowning into > murky waters more and more. > > Best regards > Janko > > Dne 10. 02. 2014 09:12, piše phil(a)highoctane.be: >> Guys, >> >> From the outside it just looks like a couple of spoiled kids battling in >> the kindergarten. >> >> All of this is not moving Smalltalk and Pharo any single bit forward. >> Backwards, there is a fair chance. >> >> Now, could you take this discussion elsewhere? Pick up a phone and talk. >> >> Who cares if anyone is right? Oh yeah, EUR 4K, what a huge amount to >> fight over for an European org... (rolleyes). >> >> Phil >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Luc Fabresse <luc.fabresse(a)gmail.com >> <mailto:luc.fabresse@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi Janko, >> >> I do not have all numbers at hand now but in 2013 there were 4 >> extra-GSOC but we paid only 3 because one student gave >> up (Jean-Baptiste Beuzelin). >> So yes you are probably right that it remains money if we integrate >> last year BUT we were willing to spend it. >> >> Luc >> >> >> 2014-02-09 Janko Mivšek <janko.mivsek(a)eranova.si >> <mailto:janko.mivsek@eranova.si>>: >> >> Dear all, >> >> First to Luc: from your numbers it is clear that you are not to be >> blamed on anything, because you were obviously misinformed and >> misguided. >> >> Facts namely are: >> >> 1. GSoC mentors decided to pay extra stipendiums 3000 USD [1] while >> ESUG without approval paid 2000 more, 5000 USD, without any >> report >> back to GSoC mentors, >> >> 2. GSoC mentors decided to add past GSoC2012 amount to the pool for >> paying extra projects [2][3]. >> >> Calculation (without the Summit expenses) therefore is: >> >> Income: GSoC 2012 13x 500 = 6.500 USD >> GSoC 2013 13x 500 = 6.500 USD >> ------------------------------ >> 13.000 USD >> >> Expenses: >> Extra stipendiums: 3x 3.000 = 9.000 USD >> >> Difference: + 4.000 USD >> >> If ESUG would follow the decisions of GSoC mentors it wouldn't >> loose any >> money but gain 4.000 USD. >> >> Those that misinformed and misguided you needs therefore to >> apologize to >> you Luc, to the GSoC mentors and to me as admin! >> >> Janko >> >> [1] >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/Yrlj8dIgGPg >> [2] >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/WwnxpkXzAB8 >> [3] >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/tR44jdPT5Hw >> >> >> Dne 09. 02. 2014 17:26, piše Luc Fabresse: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> ------------ >>> FACTS >>> >>> As you all know, I am the ESUG treasurer. >>> So please find the numbers attached for the ESUG support of GSOC >>> projects in 2013. >>> >>> ESUG sponsored 3 "extra-GSOC" meaning extra slots not accepted >> by Google. >>> In the file it is: Alejandro Infante, Pablo Estefo and >> Benjamin Arezki. >>> >>> All in all we paid: >>> - 3695EUR (~5000USD at that time i.e. same cost as a regular >> GSOC) each >>> projects >>> - Serge trip to Mentor summit >>> >>> And we received 5552EUR from Google >>> >>> so yes we lost ~6582EUR >>> That is easy 13*500 USD would only cover 1 plain extra-Gsoc and we >>> sponsorized 3. >>> >>> I also think that it is important to send someone to the GSoc >> mentor >>> summit because it participates to the fact that Google >> recognizes ESUG >>> ang gives slots the next year. >>> >>> It is alos important to note dates. >>> ESUG paid first and then has been refund by Google. >>> It would not be possible to do it without ESUG. >>> >>> ------------ >>> FROM HERE, MY POINT OF VIEW ON THIS STORY: >>> >>> As some of you know, I doing the ESUG treasury stuff on my >> *own* time >>> and it takes a lot! >>> I am doing it because I strongly believe that Smalltalk (all >> falvors!) >>> is a really great language that should be more widespread. >>> >>> I also completely open to discussions. >>> The ESUG board can also explain its actions and even money status. >>> I can do errors too. >>> So if Janko wants some details on GSOC related money, JUST ASK! >>> >>> I cannot admit that: >>> >>> - Janko wrote about some money accusation. This is directly >> directed >>> against the treasurer so me. >>> And honestly, just reading again that I am biased and that I >> hide or >>> steal money make me think that I should better quit. >>> >>> - Janko asked for apologies! what is that? even if I would >> have done a >>> mistake (and ESUG did not loose money), YOU STILL MUST THANK >> ME for >>> DOING THIS BORING TASK! and then I can correct mistakes if any >>> >>> - People wants an answer fast, this conversation started >> yesterday and I >>> am spending my week-end with my kids >>> >>> >>> I am really fed up with this kind of attitude. >>> Stop accuse, better ask, discuss and we will solve the >> problems together >>> if any. >>> But I think it will never happen... >>> >>> #Luc >>> The disgusted Treasurer of ESUG who will finish his week-end >> in bad mood >>> >> >> >> -- >> Janko Mivšek >> Smalltalk GSoC Admin Team >> >> >> > > -- > Janko Mivšek > Svetovalec za informatiko > Eranova d.o.o. > Ljubljana, Slovenija > www.eranova.si > tel: 01 514 22 55 > faks: 01 514 22 56 > gsm: 031 674 565

Feb. 10, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] The truth on GSOC, ESUG and bad attitude

by Janko Mivšek

Hi Damien, First, I do not insult anyone and certainly praise the ESUG and you guys for all work you are doing. On the other side I cannot go over bad things happening like this one. Unacceptable behavior must be exposed and treated accordingly, as I said this is needed for any community to stay healthy long-term. > ESUG might have done a mistake giving 5000€ to the students and not > the amount that people voted for. I should have paid more attention to > that and I apologize. That's all I will apologize for. Thanks for your apologize, it is appreciated. Still I think we deserve an apologize from those who spreaded privately and publicly the 'we lost money' claim. > Now, I want to have details about your message. What do you mean by > "blatantly unethical behavior"? At which point have we been unethical? This is story from GSoC 2010, a first GSoC I run as admin. Because it is so blatant, I give to the main actor a first word, then I'll explain and put on table my side of the story and arguments. In any case, this story is main reason that I started then already pushing Smalltalk GSoC to be as independent as possible, with current rename to Smalltalk proposal as a culmination. Best regards Janko Dne 10. 02. 2014 10:40, piše Damien Cassou: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Janko Mivšek <janko.mivsek(a)eranova.si> wrote: >> This matter is actually very important for Smalltalk community, because >> it exposes nontransparent, meddling behind the scenes, and in some cases >> blatantly unethical behavior of some ESUG board members. > > I thank you for your efforts running the GSoC marathon every year. > > Nevertheless, as a member of the board I feel insulted again by you > Janko. I'm tired spending hours doing work for everyone and get such a > message as an answer > > > Now, I want to have details about your message. What do you mean by > "blatantly unethical behavior"? At which point have we been unethical? > > Last time we talked about the representation of the Smalltalk > community in the ESUG board, I asked people from other communities to > apply and come work with us > (http://lists.esug.org/pipermail/esug-list_lists.esug.org/2012-July/001849.h…) > Nobody applied! I will ask again, thanks for the remainder. Who is > going to take care of ESUG if we focus on taking care of Pharo? > > Please stop insulting people. If you want to stop organizing the GSoC > for the Smalltalk community just say it clearly and we will all thank > you for the effort you have put in during this last years. But if you > want to continue, please do it with ESUG as this is what the ESUG > community seems to want if I analyse the answers you got to the recent > threads. >

Feb. 10, 2014

It makes my toes curl

by Reinout Heeck

dear Smalltalk promoters, I have too many friends that are in a divorce with kids in the picture. I have an understanding with them: they can talk (rant) to me about anything regarding their divorce, but not in public and not at parties. So this stuff: > Now, I want to have details about your message. What do you mean by > "blatantly unethical behavior"? At which point have we been unethical? please take it to a private place, not at this party. And this stuff: Cc: "smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com" <smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com>, The general-purpose Squeak developers list <squeak-dev(a)lists.squeakfoundation.org>, Pharo Development List <pharo-dev(a)lists.pharo.org>, "phil(a)highoctane.be" <phil(a)highoctane.be>, ESUG Mailing list <esug-list(a)lists.esug.org>, pharo-users <pharo-users(a)lists.pharo.org> is like my friends yelling at night keeping half the street awake. It makes my toes curl in shame, please -pretty please- tune it down. Reinout -----

Feb. 10, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] [Pharo-dev] [gsoc-mentors] The truth on GSOC, ESUG and bad attitude

by Damien Cassou

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Janko Mivšek <janko.mivsek(a)eranova.si> wrote: > This matter is actually very important for Smalltalk community, because > it exposes nontransparent, meddling behind the scenes, and in some cases > blatantly unethical behavior of some ESUG board members. I thank you for your efforts running the GSoC marathon every year. Nevertheless, as a member of the board I feel insulted again by you Janko. I'm tired spending hours doing work for everyone and get such a message as an answer ESUG might have done a mistake giving 5000€ to the students and not the amount that people voted for. I should have paid more attention to that and I apologize. That's all I will apologize for. Now, I want to have details about your message. What do you mean by "blatantly unethical behavior"? At which point have we been unethical? Last time we talked about the representation of the Smalltalk community in the ESUG board, I asked people from other communities to apply and come work with us (http://lists.esug.org/pipermail/esug-list_lists.esug.org/2012-July/001849.h…) Nobody applied! I will ask again, thanks for the remainder. Who is going to take care of ESUG if we focus on taking care of Pharo? Please stop insulting people. If you want to stop organizing the GSoC for the Smalltalk community just say it clearly and we will all thank you for the effort you have put in during this last years. But if you want to continue, please do it with ESUG as this is what the ESUG community seems to want if I analyse the answers you got to the recent threads. -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing enthusiasm." Winston Churchill

Feb. 10, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] [Pharo-dev] [gsoc-mentors] The truth on GSOC, ESUG and bad attitude

by Paolo Bonzini

Il 10/02/2014 10:16, Stéphane Ducasse ha scritto: > Paolo > > I did not discuss yet with the ESUG board but we are sick of all this. > Can you really run the GSOC this year administratively because I think > that ESUG should stop to be a bank for it? > I think that Janko is getting off. We cannot work with a person like > that. I will make us lose too much energy. > Like that the mentors will be free to do whatever they want to do. Stef, please calm down. I *hope* that you wanted to make this mail private. Public mailing lists are not the right place for this language, much less with such a wide crosspost. I already mentioned that all I care about is to have students funded by Google and working in Smalltalk. ESUG will get $500 per student, and can use them to send more people to the mentor summit or whatever else they prefer---I don't want to have *anything* to do with how ESUG spends their GSoC money. Paolo

Feb. 10, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] [Pharo-dev] [gsoc-mentors] The truth on GSOC, ESUG and bad attitude

by Joachim Tuchel

Phil, That's your opinion. I don't think money of sponsors should be spent with such an attitude. Unfortunately, I do not fully unerstand what Janko is saying and the links he provided don't help me really. Is he saying that the ESUG board ignored the vote of gsoc mentors on how much to pay to students in the additional projects? Was that money spent unequally and does Janko say this was unfair and does he say the projects that got more did so because they were pharo projects? If so, this needs some explanation. If it's not true, we can go on and say the board did it with the members' placet. Then we can shrug and say "so what?" Thats what we have a motivated and elected board for. I agree with you in so far as this is a really bad moment in time for this discussion. If all of tgis means gsoc comes to a halt for Smalltalk because we cannot apply in time, that would be really a pity. As a sponsor, I'd like to know what Janko is really up to and if the way things went is okay, since I want our money to be spent for positive things, like the yearly conference and many other great things esug is doing. As a sponsor, I wouldn't want to see anybody in the board to think about our money the way you expresss it here. Even if Esug is a european organization, it has very limited financial abilities, and 4000 euros thrown away or used unethically is not peanuts. Joachim phil(a)highoctane.be schrieb: >Guys, > >>From the outside it just looks like a couple of spoiled kids battling in >the kindergarten. > >All of this is not moving Smalltalk and Pharo any single bit forward. >Backwards, there is a fair chance. > >Now, could you take this discussion elsewhere? Pick up a phone and talk. > >Who cares if anyone is right? Oh yeah, EUR 4K, what a huge amount to fight >over for an European org... (rolleyes). > >Phil > > > > >On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Luc Fabresse <luc.fabresse(a)gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hi Janko, >> >> I do not have all numbers at hand now but in 2013 there were 4 extra-GSOC >> but we paid only 3 because one student gave up (Jean-Baptiste Beuzelin). >> So yes you are probably right that it remains money if we integrate last >> year BUT we were willing to spend it. >> >> Luc >> >> >> 2014-02-09 Janko Mivšek <janko.mivsek(a)eranova.si>: >> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> First to Luc: from your numbers it is clear that you are not to be >>> blamed on anything, because you were obviously misinformed and misguided. >>> >>> Facts namely are: >>> >>> 1. GSoC mentors decided to pay extra stipendiums 3000 USD [1] while >>> ESUG without approval paid 2000 more, 5000 USD, without any report >>> back to GSoC mentors, >>> >>> 2. GSoC mentors decided to add past GSoC2012 amount to the pool for >>> paying extra projects [2][3]. >>> >>> Calculation (without the Summit expenses) therefore is: >>> >>> Income: GSoC 2012 13x 500 = 6.500 USD >>> GSoC 2013 13x 500 = 6.500 USD >>> ------------------------------ >>> 13.000 USD >>> >>> Expenses: >>> Extra stipendiums: 3x 3.000 = 9.000 USD >>> >>> Difference: + 4.000 USD >>> >>> If ESUG would follow the decisions of GSoC mentors it wouldn't loose any >>> money but gain 4.000 USD. >>> >>> Those that misinformed and misguided you needs therefore to apologize to >>> you Luc, to the GSoC mentors and to me as admin! >>> >>> Janko >>> >>> [1] >>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/Yrlj8dIgGPg >>> [2] >>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/WwnxpkXzAB8 >>> [3] >>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/tR44jdPT5Hw >>> >>> >>> Dne 09. 02. 2014 17:26, piše Luc Fabresse: >>> > Hi all, >>> > >>> > ------------ >>> > FACTS >>> > >>> > As you all know, I am the ESUG treasurer. >>> > So please find the numbers attached for the ESUG support of GSOC >>> > projects in 2013. >>> > >>> > ESUG sponsored 3 "extra-GSOC" meaning extra slots not accepted by >>> Google. >>> > In the file it is: Alejandro Infante, Pablo Estefo and Benjamin Arezki. >>> > >>> > All in all we paid: >>> > - 3695EUR (~5000USD at that time i.e. same cost as a regular GSOC) each >>> > projects >>> > - Serge trip to Mentor summit >>> > >>> > And we received 5552EUR from Google >>> > >>> > so yes we lost ~6582EUR >>> > That is easy 13*500 USD would only cover 1 plain extra-Gsoc and we >>> > sponsorized 3. >>> > >>> > I also think that it is important to send someone to the GSoc mentor >>> > summit because it participates to the fact that Google recognizes ESUG >>> > ang gives slots the next year. >>> > >>> > It is alos important to note dates. >>> > ESUG paid first and then has been refund by Google. >>> > It would not be possible to do it without ESUG. >>> > >>> > ------------ >>> > FROM HERE, MY POINT OF VIEW ON THIS STORY: >>> > >>> > As some of you know, I doing the ESUG treasury stuff on my *own* time >>> > and it takes a lot! >>> > I am doing it because I strongly believe that Smalltalk (all falvors!) >>> > is a really great language that should be more widespread. >>> > >>> > I also completely open to discussions. >>> > The ESUG board can also explain its actions and even money status. >>> > I can do errors too. >>> > So if Janko wants some details on GSOC related money, JUST ASK! >>> > >>> > I cannot admit that: >>> > >>> > - Janko wrote about some money accusation. This is directly directed >>> > against the treasurer so me. >>> > And honestly, just reading again that I am biased and that I hide or >>> > steal money make me think that I should better quit. >>> > >>> > - Janko asked for apologies! what is that? even if I would have done a >>> > mistake (and ESUG did not loose money), YOU STILL MUST THANK ME for >>> > DOING THIS BORING TASK! and then I can correct mistakes if any >>> > >>> > - People wants an answer fast, this conversation started yesterday and I >>> > am spending my week-end with my kids >>> > >>> > >>> > I am really fed up with this kind of attitude. >>> > Stop accuse, better ask, discuss and we will solve the problems together >>> > if any. >>> > But I think it will never happen... >>> > >>> > #Luc >>> > The disgusted Treasurer of ESUG who will finish his week-end in bad mood >>> > >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Janko Mivšek >>> Smalltalk GSoC Admin Team >>> >> >> > >_______________________________________________ >Esug-list mailing list >Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org >http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org

Feb. 10, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] [Pharo-dev] [gsoc-mentors] The truth on GSOC, ESUG and bad attitude

by Stéphane Ducasse

Paolo I did not discuss yet with the ESUG board but we are sick of all this. Can you really run the GSOC this year administratively because I think that ESUG should stop to be a bank for it? I think that Janko is getting off. We cannot work with a person like that. I will make us lose too much energy. Like that the mentors will be free to do whatever they want to do. Stef > Dear all, > > First to Luc: from your numbers it is clear that you are not to be > blamed on anything, because you were obviously misinformed and misguided. > > Facts namely are: > > 1. GSoC mentors decided to pay extra stipendiums 3000 USD [1] while > ESUG without approval paid 2000 more, 5000 USD, without any report > back to GSoC mentors, > > 2. GSoC mentors decided to add past GSoC2012 amount to the pool for > paying extra projects [2][3]. > > Calculation (without the Summit expenses) therefore is: > > Income: GSoC 2012 13x 500 = 6.500 USD > GSoC 2013 13x 500 = 6.500 USD > ------------------------------ > 13.000 USD > > Expenses: > Extra stipendiums: 3x 3.000 = 9.000 USD > > Difference: + 4.000 USD > > If ESUG would follow the decisions of GSoC mentors it wouldn't loose any > money but gain 4.000 USD. > > Those that misinformed and misguided you needs therefore to apologize to > you Luc, to the GSoC mentors and to me as admin! > > Janko > > [1] > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/Yrlj8dIgGPg > [2] > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/WwnxpkXzAB8 > [3] > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/tR44jdPT5Hw > > > Dne 09. 02. 2014 17:26, piše Luc Fabresse: >> Hi all, >> >> ------------ >> FACTS >> >> As you all know, I am the ESUG treasurer. >> So please find the numbers attached for the ESUG support of GSOC >> projects in 2013. >> >> ESUG sponsored 3 "extra-GSOC" meaning extra slots not accepted by Google. >> In the file it is: Alejandro Infante, Pablo Estefo and Benjamin Arezki. >> >> All in all we paid: >> - 3695EUR (~5000USD at that time i.e. same cost as a regular GSOC) each >> projects >> - Serge trip to Mentor summit >> >> And we received 5552EUR from Google >> >> so yes we lost ~6582EUR >> That is easy 13*500 USD would only cover 1 plain extra-Gsoc and we >> sponsorized 3. >> >> I also think that it is important to send someone to the GSoc mentor >> summit because it participates to the fact that Google recognizes ESUG >> ang gives slots the next year. >> >> It is alos important to note dates. >> ESUG paid first and then has been refund by Google. >> It would not be possible to do it without ESUG. >> >> ------------ >> FROM HERE, MY POINT OF VIEW ON THIS STORY: >> >> As some of you know, I doing the ESUG treasury stuff on my *own* time >> and it takes a lot! >> I am doing it because I strongly believe that Smalltalk (all falvors!) >> is a really great language that should be more widespread. >> >> I also completely open to discussions. >> The ESUG board can also explain its actions and even money status. >> I can do errors too. >> So if Janko wants some details on GSOC related money, JUST ASK! >> >> I cannot admit that: >> >> - Janko wrote about some money accusation. This is directly directed >> against the treasurer so me. >> And honestly, just reading again that I am biased and that I hide or >> steal money make me think that I should better quit. >> >> - Janko asked for apologies! what is that? even if I would have done a >> mistake (and ESUG did not loose money), YOU STILL MUST THANK ME for >> DOING THIS BORING TASK! and then I can correct mistakes if any >> >> - People wants an answer fast, this conversation started yesterday and I >> am spending my week-end with my kids >> >> >> I am really fed up with this kind of attitude. >> Stop accuse, better ask, discuss and we will solve the problems together >> if any. >> But I think it will never happen... >> >> #Luc >> The disgusted Treasurer of ESUG who will finish his week-end in bad mood >> > > > -- > Janko Mivšek > Smalltalk GSoC Admin Team

Feb. 10, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] [Pharo-dev] [gsoc-mentors] The truth on GSOC, ESUG and bad attitude

by Stéphane Ducasse

> If ESUG would follow the decisions of GSoC mentors it wouldn't loose any > money but gain 4.000 USD. This is what I thought when luc told me that we lost money. Now he did not show to he ESUG board the exact details because he did not crawl yet in all the bills. Now if you check the old in the mailing-list I even said that there was no problem for 2000 Euros esug would cover that if this cover an extra student. > From: =?utf-8?Q?St=E9phane_Ducasse?= <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="Apple-Mail=_A78B91E4-981F-4B83-9067-420161886C2C" > Message-Id: <289E789F-067E-420F-98EC-4F1864BCE256(a)inria.fr> > Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 $1503$) > X-Smtp-Server: smtp.inria.fr:sducasse > Subject: Re: [gsoc-mentors] Inform the students of four extra projects! > Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 13:34:36 +0200 > X-Universally-Unique-Identifier: 89665803-9c98-4385-80b9-e5c1c3e1e418 > References: <b29080aa-e7b3-4e5a-9e15-8a5166c8b50a(a)googlegroups.com> <51A45CBF.10201(a)gmail.com> <fb3802c2-1be6-42bc-a12f-47bc528fa7b9(a)googlegroups.com> <f63d8d0d-28cf-438c-ad77-4bfdba8ed376(a)googlegroups.com> <51A48D00.20701(a)gmail.com> <0fa78595-f94f-4bdb-aa07-2a706d2b9cc1(a)googlegroups.com> > To: smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com > In-Reply-To: <0fa78595-f94f-4bdb-aa07-2a706d2b9cc1(a)googlegroups.com> > > > --Apple-Mail=_A78B91E4-981F-4B83-9067-420161886C2C > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset=windows-1252 > > Guys > > ESUG can solve that. we should avoid to spend time on that for 2000 = > Euros. > > > Stef > On May 28, 2013, at 1:06 PM, Janko Miv=9Aek <janko.mivsek(a)gmail.com> = > wrote: So Janko I would be grateful that you STOP. > Those that misinformed and misguided you needs therefore to apologize to > you Luc, to the GSoC mentors and to me as admin! Who are those guys? Seriously you are getting really over. Stef > > Janko > > [1] > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/Yrlj8dIgGPg > [2] > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/WwnxpkXzAB8 > [3] > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/tR44jdPT5Hw > > > Dne 09. 02. 2014 17:26, piše Luc Fabresse: >> Hi all, >> >> ------------ >> FACTS >> >> As you all know, I am the ESUG treasurer. >> So please find the numbers attached for the ESUG support of GSOC >> projects in 2013. >> >> ESUG sponsored 3 "extra-GSOC" meaning extra slots not accepted by Google. >> In the file it is: Alejandro Infante, Pablo Estefo and Benjamin Arezki. >> >> All in all we paid: >> - 3695EUR (~5000USD at that time i.e. same cost as a regular GSOC) each >> projects >> - Serge trip to Mentor summit >> >> And we received 5552EUR from Google >> >> so yes we lost ~6582EUR >> That is easy 13*500 USD would only cover 1 plain extra-Gsoc and we >> sponsorized 3. >> >> I also think that it is important to send someone to the GSoc mentor >> summit because it participates to the fact that Google recognizes ESUG >> ang gives slots the next year. >> >> It is alos important to note dates. >> ESUG paid first and then has been refund by Google. >> It would not be possible to do it without ESUG. >> >> ------------ >> FROM HERE, MY POINT OF VIEW ON THIS STORY: >> >> As some of you know, I doing the ESUG treasury stuff on my *own* time >> and it takes a lot! >> I am doing it because I strongly believe that Smalltalk (all falvors!) >> is a really great language that should be more widespread. >> >> I also completely open to discussions. >> The ESUG board can also explain its actions and even money status. >> I can do errors too. >> So if Janko wants some details on GSOC related money, JUST ASK! >> >> I cannot admit that: >> >> - Janko wrote about some money accusation. This is directly directed >> against the treasurer so me. >> And honestly, just reading again that I am biased and that I hide or >> steal money make me think that I should better quit. >> >> - Janko asked for apologies! what is that? even if I would have done a >> mistake (and ESUG did not loose money), YOU STILL MUST THANK ME for >> DOING THIS BORING TASK! and then I can correct mistakes if any >> >> - People wants an answer fast, this conversation started yesterday and I >> am spending my week-end with my kids >> >> >> I am really fed up with this kind of attitude. >> Stop accuse, better ask, discuss and we will solve the problems together >> if any. >> But I think it will never happen... >> >> #Luc >> The disgusted Treasurer of ESUG who will finish his week-end in bad mood >> > > > -- > Janko Mivšek > Smalltalk GSoC Admin Team

Feb. 10, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] [Pharo-dev] [gsoc-mentors] The truth on GSOC, ESUG and bad attitude

by phil＠highoctane.be

Janko, >From what I know from good business practices is that what helps in keeping things in order is good financial management and transparency. So, the general ledger should be made accessible so things are clear on that front. For the Google story, upfront payment by ESUG while waiting for Google money should have been registered with postings that reflected that (like with an account on "expected revenue from Google") and balanced against it. If one would spend money beyond the credit limits, there would be an issue. So, escalation should be taking place to decide. There seems to be a board, and the board ultimately decides on that front. Which it apparently did. Whoever is not happy with that decision will at one point accept it as this is the top decision point. Or start a revolution, split, or whatever. There are always things going on behind the curtain. Politics is a fact of life. I you have a personal gripe with some members, you put the dead rat on the table. Now is it time time speak up about who/what/why and discuss that with them. Now, the Smalltalk community appears to be fragmented, and the Pharo|Squeak technology, even if very cool, is currently not helping me much on the revenue making front. My bottom line isn't booking more that EUR 15K on Pharo related sales. Not that I am not pushing. I'd love to be putting decent bread on the table through Pharo. FWIW, when it comes to current trends like Internet of Things, BigData [Hadoop stuff], and Mobile, Smalltalk is at ground zero given the ecosystem. So, fighting internally like that isn't getting us forward while everything is swooshing past. Phil On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Janko Mivšek <janko.mivsek(a)eranova.si>wrote: > Phil, > > This matter is actually very important for Smalltalk community, because > it exposes nontransparent, meddling behind the scenes, and in some cases > blatantly unethical behavior of some ESUG board members. Which is > certainly bad for our community on long term. > > Such matters need to be clarified and some conclusions to be made for a > community to preserve health and go on. Otherwise you are drowning into > murky waters more and more. > > Best regards > Janko > > Dne 10. 02. 2014 09:12, piše phil(a)highoctane.be: > > Guys, > > > > From the outside it just looks like a couple of spoiled kids battling in > > the kindergarten. > > > > All of this is not moving Smalltalk and Pharo any single bit forward. > > Backwards, there is a fair chance. > > > > Now, could you take this discussion elsewhere? Pick up a phone and talk. > > > > Who cares if anyone is right? Oh yeah, EUR 4K, what a huge amount to > > fight over for an European org... (rolleyes). > > > > Phil > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Luc Fabresse <luc.fabresse(a)gmail.com > > <mailto:luc.fabresse@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > Hi Janko, > > > > I do not have all numbers at hand now but in 2013 there were 4 > > extra-GSOC but we paid only 3 because one student gave > > up (Jean-Baptiste Beuzelin). > > So yes you are probably right that it remains money if we integrate > > last year BUT we were willing to spend it. > > > > Luc > > > > > > 2014-02-09 Janko Mivšek <janko.mivsek(a)eranova.si > > <mailto:janko.mivsek@eranova.si>>: > > > > Dear all, > > > > First to Luc: from your numbers it is clear that you are not to > be > > blamed on anything, because you were obviously misinformed and > > misguided. > > > > Facts namely are: > > > > 1. GSoC mentors decided to pay extra stipendiums 3000 USD [1] > while > > ESUG without approval paid 2000 more, 5000 USD, without any > > report > > back to GSoC mentors, > > > > 2. GSoC mentors decided to add past GSoC2012 amount to the pool > for > > paying extra projects [2][3]. > > > > Calculation (without the Summit expenses) therefore is: > > > > Income: GSoC 2012 13x 500 = 6.500 USD > > GSoC 2013 13x 500 = 6.500 USD > > ------------------------------ > > 13.000 USD > > > > Expenses: > > Extra stipendiums: 3x 3.000 = 9.000 USD > > > > Difference: + 4.000 USD > > > > If ESUG would follow the decisions of GSoC mentors it wouldn't > > loose any > > money but gain 4.000 USD. > > > > Those that misinformed and misguided you needs therefore to > > apologize to > > you Luc, to the GSoC mentors and to me as admin! > > > > Janko > > > > [1] > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/Yrlj8dIgGPg > > [2] > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/WwnxpkXzAB8 > > [3] > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/tR44jdPT5Hw > > > > > > Dne 09. 02. 2014 17:26, piše Luc Fabresse: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > ------------ > > > FACTS > > > > > > As you all know, I am the ESUG treasurer. > > > So please find the numbers attached for the ESUG support of > GSOC > > > projects in 2013. > > > > > > ESUG sponsored 3 "extra-GSOC" meaning extra slots not accepted > > by Google. > > > In the file it is: Alejandro Infante, Pablo Estefo and > > Benjamin Arezki. > > > > > > All in all we paid: > > > - 3695EUR (~5000USD at that time i.e. same cost as a regular > > GSOC) each > > > projects > > > - Serge trip to Mentor summit > > > > > > And we received 5552EUR from Google > > > > > > so yes we lost ~6582EUR > > > That is easy 13*500 USD would only cover 1 plain extra-Gsoc > and we > > > sponsorized 3. > > > > > > I also think that it is important to send someone to the GSoc > > mentor > > > summit because it participates to the fact that Google > > recognizes ESUG > > > ang gives slots the next year. > > > > > > It is alos important to note dates. > > > ESUG paid first and then has been refund by Google. > > > It would not be possible to do it without ESUG. > > > > > > ------------ > > > FROM HERE, MY POINT OF VIEW ON THIS STORY: > > > > > > As some of you know, I doing the ESUG treasury stuff on my > > *own* time > > > and it takes a lot! > > > I am doing it because I strongly believe that Smalltalk (all > > falvors!) > > > is a really great language that should be more widespread. > > > > > > I also completely open to discussions. > > > The ESUG board can also explain its actions and even money > status. > > > I can do errors too. > > > So if Janko wants some details on GSOC related money, JUST ASK! > > > > > > I cannot admit that: > > > > > > - Janko wrote about some money accusation. This is directly > > directed > > > against the treasurer so me. > > > And honestly, just reading again that I am biased and that I > > hide or > > > steal money make me think that I should better quit. > > > > > > - Janko asked for apologies! what is that? even if I would > > have done a > > > mistake (and ESUG did not loose money), YOU STILL MUST THANK > > ME for > > > DOING THIS BORING TASK! and then I can correct mistakes if any > > > > > > - People wants an answer fast, this conversation started > > yesterday and I > > > am spending my week-end with my kids > > > > > > > > > I am really fed up with this kind of attitude. > > > Stop accuse, better ask, discuss and we will solve the > > problems together > > > if any. > > > But I think it will never happen... > > > > > > #Luc > > > The disgusted Treasurer of ESUG who will finish his week-end > > in bad mood > > > > > > > > > -- > > Janko Mivšek > > Smalltalk GSoC Admin Team > > > > > > > > -- > Janko Mivšek > Svetovalec za informatiko > Eranova d.o.o. > Ljubljana, Slovenija > www.eranova.si > tel: 01 514 22 55 > faks: 01 514 22 56 > gsm: 031 674 565 > >

Feb. 10, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] [Pharo-dev] [gsoc-mentors] The truth on GSOC, ESUG and bad attitude

by Janko Mivšek

Phil, This matter is actually very important for Smalltalk community, because it exposes nontransparent, meddling behind the scenes, and in some cases blatantly unethical behavior of some ESUG board members. Which is certainly bad for our community on long term. Such matters need to be clarified and some conclusions to be made for a community to preserve health and go on. Otherwise you are drowning into murky waters more and more. Best regards Janko Dne 10. 02. 2014 09:12, piše phil(a)highoctane.be: > Guys, > > From the outside it just looks like a couple of spoiled kids battling in > the kindergarten. > > All of this is not moving Smalltalk and Pharo any single bit forward. > Backwards, there is a fair chance. > > Now, could you take this discussion elsewhere? Pick up a phone and talk. > > Who cares if anyone is right? Oh yeah, EUR 4K, what a huge amount to > fight over for an European org... (rolleyes). > > Phil > > > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Luc Fabresse <luc.fabresse(a)gmail.com > <mailto:luc.fabresse@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi Janko, > > I do not have all numbers at hand now but in 2013 there were 4 > extra-GSOC but we paid only 3 because one student gave > up (Jean-Baptiste Beuzelin). > So yes you are probably right that it remains money if we integrate > last year BUT we were willing to spend it. > > Luc > > > 2014-02-09 Janko Mivšek <janko.mivsek(a)eranova.si > <mailto:janko.mivsek@eranova.si>>: > > Dear all, > > First to Luc: from your numbers it is clear that you are not to be > blamed on anything, because you were obviously misinformed and > misguided. > > Facts namely are: > > 1. GSoC mentors decided to pay extra stipendiums 3000 USD [1] while > ESUG without approval paid 2000 more, 5000 USD, without any > report > back to GSoC mentors, > > 2. GSoC mentors decided to add past GSoC2012 amount to the pool for > paying extra projects [2][3]. > > Calculation (without the Summit expenses) therefore is: > > Income: GSoC 2012 13x 500 = 6.500 USD > GSoC 2013 13x 500 = 6.500 USD > ------------------------------ > 13.000 USD > > Expenses: > Extra stipendiums: 3x 3.000 = 9.000 USD > > Difference: + 4.000 USD > > If ESUG would follow the decisions of GSoC mentors it wouldn't > loose any > money but gain 4.000 USD. > > Those that misinformed and misguided you needs therefore to > apologize to > you Luc, to the GSoC mentors and to me as admin! > > Janko > > [1] > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/Yrlj8dIgGPg > [2] > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/WwnxpkXzAB8 > [3] > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/tR44jdPT5Hw > > > Dne 09. 02. 2014 17:26, piše Luc Fabresse: > > Hi all, > > > > ------------ > > FACTS > > > > As you all know, I am the ESUG treasurer. > > So please find the numbers attached for the ESUG support of GSOC > > projects in 2013. > > > > ESUG sponsored 3 "extra-GSOC" meaning extra slots not accepted > by Google. > > In the file it is: Alejandro Infante, Pablo Estefo and > Benjamin Arezki. > > > > All in all we paid: > > - 3695EUR (~5000USD at that time i.e. same cost as a regular > GSOC) each > > projects > > - Serge trip to Mentor summit > > > > And we received 5552EUR from Google > > > > so yes we lost ~6582EUR > > That is easy 13*500 USD would only cover 1 plain extra-Gsoc and we > > sponsorized 3. > > > > I also think that it is important to send someone to the GSoc > mentor > > summit because it participates to the fact that Google > recognizes ESUG > > ang gives slots the next year. > > > > It is alos important to note dates. > > ESUG paid first and then has been refund by Google. > > It would not be possible to do it without ESUG. > > > > ------------ > > FROM HERE, MY POINT OF VIEW ON THIS STORY: > > > > As some of you know, I doing the ESUG treasury stuff on my > *own* time > > and it takes a lot! > > I am doing it because I strongly believe that Smalltalk (all > falvors!) > > is a really great language that should be more widespread. > > > > I also completely open to discussions. > > The ESUG board can also explain its actions and even money status. > > I can do errors too. > > So if Janko wants some details on GSOC related money, JUST ASK! > > > > I cannot admit that: > > > > - Janko wrote about some money accusation. This is directly > directed > > against the treasurer so me. > > And honestly, just reading again that I am biased and that I > hide or > > steal money make me think that I should better quit. > > > > - Janko asked for apologies! what is that? even if I would > have done a > > mistake (and ESUG did not loose money), YOU STILL MUST THANK > ME for > > DOING THIS BORING TASK! and then I can correct mistakes if any > > > > - People wants an answer fast, this conversation started > yesterday and I > > am spending my week-end with my kids > > > > > > I am really fed up with this kind of attitude. > > Stop accuse, better ask, discuss and we will solve the > problems together > > if any. > > But I think it will never happen... > > > > #Luc > > The disgusted Treasurer of ESUG who will finish his week-end > in bad mood > > > > > -- > Janko Mivšek > Smalltalk GSoC Admin Team > > > -- Janko Mivšek Svetovalec za informatiko Eranova d.o.o. Ljubljana, Slovenija www.eranova.si tel: 01 514 22 55 faks: 01 514 22 56 gsm: 031 674 565

Feb. 10, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] [Pharo-dev] [gsoc-mentors] The truth on GSOC, ESUG and bad attitude

by phil＠highoctane.be

Guys, >From the outside it just looks like a couple of spoiled kids battling in the kindergarten. All of this is not moving Smalltalk and Pharo any single bit forward. Backwards, there is a fair chance. Now, could you take this discussion elsewhere? Pick up a phone and talk. Who cares if anyone is right? Oh yeah, EUR 4K, what a huge amount to fight over for an European org... (rolleyes). Phil On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Luc Fabresse <luc.fabresse(a)gmail.com>wrote: > Hi Janko, > > I do not have all numbers at hand now but in 2013 there were 4 extra-GSOC > but we paid only 3 because one student gave up (Jean-Baptiste Beuzelin). > So yes you are probably right that it remains money if we integrate last > year BUT we were willing to spend it. > > Luc > > > 2014-02-09 Janko Mivšek <janko.mivsek(a)eranova.si>: > >> Dear all, >> >> First to Luc: from your numbers it is clear that you are not to be >> blamed on anything, because you were obviously misinformed and misguided. >> >> Facts namely are: >> >> 1. GSoC mentors decided to pay extra stipendiums 3000 USD [1] while >> ESUG without approval paid 2000 more, 5000 USD, without any report >> back to GSoC mentors, >> >> 2. GSoC mentors decided to add past GSoC2012 amount to the pool for >> paying extra projects [2][3]. >> >> Calculation (without the Summit expenses) therefore is: >> >> Income: GSoC 2012 13x 500 = 6.500 USD >> GSoC 2013 13x 500 = 6.500 USD >> ------------------------------ >> 13.000 USD >> >> Expenses: >> Extra stipendiums: 3x 3.000 = 9.000 USD >> >> Difference: + 4.000 USD >> >> If ESUG would follow the decisions of GSoC mentors it wouldn't loose any >> money but gain 4.000 USD. >> >> Those that misinformed and misguided you needs therefore to apologize to >> you Luc, to the GSoC mentors and to me as admin! >> >> Janko >> >> [1] >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/Yrlj8dIgGPg >> [2] >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/WwnxpkXzAB8 >> [3] >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/tR44jdPT5Hw >> >> >> Dne 09. 02. 2014 17:26, piše Luc Fabresse: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > ------------ >> > FACTS >> > >> > As you all know, I am the ESUG treasurer. >> > So please find the numbers attached for the ESUG support of GSOC >> > projects in 2013. >> > >> > ESUG sponsored 3 "extra-GSOC" meaning extra slots not accepted by >> Google. >> > In the file it is: Alejandro Infante, Pablo Estefo and Benjamin Arezki. >> > >> > All in all we paid: >> > - 3695EUR (~5000USD at that time i.e. same cost as a regular GSOC) each >> > projects >> > - Serge trip to Mentor summit >> > >> > And we received 5552EUR from Google >> > >> > so yes we lost ~6582EUR >> > That is easy 13*500 USD would only cover 1 plain extra-Gsoc and we >> > sponsorized 3. >> > >> > I also think that it is important to send someone to the GSoc mentor >> > summit because it participates to the fact that Google recognizes ESUG >> > ang gives slots the next year. >> > >> > It is alos important to note dates. >> > ESUG paid first and then has been refund by Google. >> > It would not be possible to do it without ESUG. >> > >> > ------------ >> > FROM HERE, MY POINT OF VIEW ON THIS STORY: >> > >> > As some of you know, I doing the ESUG treasury stuff on my *own* time >> > and it takes a lot! >> > I am doing it because I strongly believe that Smalltalk (all falvors!) >> > is a really great language that should be more widespread. >> > >> > I also completely open to discussions. >> > The ESUG board can also explain its actions and even money status. >> > I can do errors too. >> > So if Janko wants some details on GSOC related money, JUST ASK! >> > >> > I cannot admit that: >> > >> > - Janko wrote about some money accusation. This is directly directed >> > against the treasurer so me. >> > And honestly, just reading again that I am biased and that I hide or >> > steal money make me think that I should better quit. >> > >> > - Janko asked for apologies! what is that? even if I would have done a >> > mistake (and ESUG did not loose money), YOU STILL MUST THANK ME for >> > DOING THIS BORING TASK! and then I can correct mistakes if any >> > >> > - People wants an answer fast, this conversation started yesterday and I >> > am spending my week-end with my kids >> > >> > >> > I am really fed up with this kind of attitude. >> > Stop accuse, better ask, discuss and we will solve the problems together >> > if any. >> > But I think it will never happen... >> > >> > #Luc >> > The disgusted Treasurer of ESUG who will finish his week-end in bad mood >> > >> >> >> -- >> Janko Mivšek >> Smalltalk GSoC Admin Team >> > >

Feb. 10, 2014

Pharo Weekly

by Stéphane Ducasse

Hi guys I started a blog about pharo for those that do not want to read 1000 mails to get information :) http://pharoweekly.wordpress.com/ Spread the word Stef

Feb. 10, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] [gsoc-mentors] The truth on GSOC, ESUG and bad attitude

by Luc Fabresse

Hi Janko, I do not have all numbers at hand now but in 2013 there were 4 extra-GSOC but we paid only 3 because one student gave up (Jean-Baptiste Beuzelin). So yes you are probably right that it remains money if we integrate last year BUT we were willing to spend it. Luc 2014-02-09 Janko Mivšek <janko.mivsek(a)eranova.si>: > Dear all, > > First to Luc: from your numbers it is clear that you are not to be > blamed on anything, because you were obviously misinformed and misguided. > > Facts namely are: > > 1. GSoC mentors decided to pay extra stipendiums 3000 USD [1] while > ESUG without approval paid 2000 more, 5000 USD, without any report > back to GSoC mentors, > > 2. GSoC mentors decided to add past GSoC2012 amount to the pool for > paying extra projects [2][3]. > > Calculation (without the Summit expenses) therefore is: > > Income: GSoC 2012 13x 500 = 6.500 USD > GSoC 2013 13x 500 = 6.500 USD > ------------------------------ > 13.000 USD > > Expenses: > Extra stipendiums: 3x 3.000 = 9.000 USD > > Difference: + 4.000 USD > > If ESUG would follow the decisions of GSoC mentors it wouldn't loose any > money but gain 4.000 USD. > > Those that misinformed and misguided you needs therefore to apologize to > you Luc, to the GSoC mentors and to me as admin! > > Janko > > [1] > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/Yrlj8dIgGPg > [2] > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/WwnxpkXzAB8 > [3] > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/tR44jdPT5Hw > > > Dne 09. 02. 2014 17:26, piše Luc Fabresse: > > Hi all, > > > > ------------ > > FACTS > > > > As you all know, I am the ESUG treasurer. > > So please find the numbers attached for the ESUG support of GSOC > > projects in 2013. > > > > ESUG sponsored 3 "extra-GSOC" meaning extra slots not accepted by Google. > > In the file it is: Alejandro Infante, Pablo Estefo and Benjamin Arezki. > > > > All in all we paid: > > - 3695EUR (~5000USD at that time i.e. same cost as a regular GSOC) each > > projects > > - Serge trip to Mentor summit > > > > And we received 5552EUR from Google > > > > so yes we lost ~6582EUR > > That is easy 13*500 USD would only cover 1 plain extra-Gsoc and we > > sponsorized 3. > > > > I also think that it is important to send someone to the GSoc mentor > > summit because it participates to the fact that Google recognizes ESUG > > ang gives slots the next year. > > > > It is alos important to note dates. > > ESUG paid first and then has been refund by Google. > > It would not be possible to do it without ESUG. > > > > ------------ > > FROM HERE, MY POINT OF VIEW ON THIS STORY: > > > > As some of you know, I doing the ESUG treasury stuff on my *own* time > > and it takes a lot! > > I am doing it because I strongly believe that Smalltalk (all falvors!) > > is a really great language that should be more widespread. > > > > I also completely open to discussions. > > The ESUG board can also explain its actions and even money status. > > I can do errors too. > > So if Janko wants some details on GSOC related money, JUST ASK! > > > > I cannot admit that: > > > > - Janko wrote about some money accusation. This is directly directed > > against the treasurer so me. > > And honestly, just reading again that I am biased and that I hide or > > steal money make me think that I should better quit. > > > > - Janko asked for apologies! what is that? even if I would have done a > > mistake (and ESUG did not loose money), YOU STILL MUST THANK ME for > > DOING THIS BORING TASK! and then I can correct mistakes if any > > > > - People wants an answer fast, this conversation started yesterday and I > > am spending my week-end with my kids > > > > > > I am really fed up with this kind of attitude. > > Stop accuse, better ask, discuss and we will solve the problems together > > if any. > > But I think it will never happen... > > > > #Luc > > The disgusted Treasurer of ESUG who will finish his week-end in bad mood > > > > > -- > Janko Mivšek > Smalltalk GSoC Admin Team >

Feb. 10, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] The truth on GSOC, ESUG and bad attitude

by Richard Sargent

I for one am grateful to Luc, Stéphane, and the rest of the ESUG volunteers for all the work they do. And I am grateful to the many people who are making Pharo the active free Smalltalk it is. I think Luc's advice "Stop accuse, better ask, discuss and we will solve the problems together if any" is good advice. I would offer one small bit of advice, too. The communication on this mailing list is predominantly in ENglish (for which I am also grateful!). There are many people posting on it whose first language is not English. There will certainly be poorly phrased statements and miscommunications, so it is especially important that people have discussions before posting things to the list for all to see. _____ From: Esug-list [mailto:esug-list-bounces@lists.esug.org] On Behalf Of Luc Fabresse Sent: February 9, 2014 08:27 To: Janko Mivšek; ESUG Mailing list; smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com Cc: pharo-users; Pharo Development List; The general-purpose Squeak developers list Subject: [Esug-list] The truth on GSOC, ESUG and bad attitude Hi all, ------------ FACTS As you all know, I am the ESUG treasurer. So please find the numbers attached for the ESUG support of GSOC projects in 2013. ESUG sponsored 3 "extra-GSOC" meaning extra slots not accepted by Google. In the file it is: Alejandro Infante, Pablo Estefo and Benjamin Arezki. All in all we paid: - 3695EUR (~5000USD at that time i.e. same cost as a regular GSOC) each projects - Serge trip to Mentor summit And we received 5552EUR from Google so yes we lost ~6582EUR That is easy 13*500 USD would only cover 1 plain extra-Gsoc and we sponsorized 3. I also think that it is important to send someone to the GSoc mentor summit because it participates to the fact that Google recognizes ESUG ang gives slots the next year. It is alos important to note dates. ESUG paid first and then has been refund by Google. It would not be possible to do it without ESUG. ------------ FROM HERE, MY POINT OF VIEW ON THIS STORY: As some of you know, I doing the ESUG treasury stuff on my *own* time and it takes a lot! I am doing it because I strongly believe that Smalltalk (all falvors!) is a really great language that should be more widespread. I also completely open to discussions. The ESUG board can also explain its actions and even money status. I can do errors too. So if Janko wants some details on GSOC related money, JUST ASK! I cannot admit that: - Janko wrote about some money accusation. This is directly directed against the treasurer so me. And honestly, just reading again that I am biased and that I hide or steal money make me think that I should better quit. - Janko asked for apologies! what is that? even if I would have done a mistake (and ESUG did not loose money), YOU STILL MUST THANK ME for DOING THIS BORING TASK! and then I can correct mistakes if any - People wants an answer fast, this conversation started yesterday and I am spending my week-end with my kids I am really fed up with this kind of attitude. Stop accuse, better ask, discuss and we will solve the problems together if any. But I think it will never happen... #Luc The disgusted Treasurer of ESUG who will finish his week-end in bad mood

Feb. 9, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] [gsoc-mentors] The truth on GSOC, ESUG and bad attitude

by Janko Mivšek

Dear all, First to Luc: from your numbers it is clear that you are not to be blamed on anything, because you were obviously misinformed and misguided. Facts namely are: 1. GSoC mentors decided to pay extra stipendiums 3000 USD [1] while ESUG without approval paid 2000 more, 5000 USD, without any report back to GSoC mentors, 2. GSoC mentors decided to add past GSoC2012 amount to the pool for paying extra projects [2][3]. Calculation (without the Summit expenses) therefore is: Income: GSoC 2012 13x 500 = 6.500 USD GSoC 2013 13x 500 = 6.500 USD ------------------------------ 13.000 USD Expenses: Extra stipendiums: 3x 3.000 = 9.000 USD Difference: + 4.000 USD If ESUG would follow the decisions of GSoC mentors it wouldn't loose any money but gain 4.000 USD. Those that misinformed and misguided you needs therefore to apologize to you Luc, to the GSoC mentors and to me as admin! Janko [1] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/Yrlj8dIgGPg [2] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/WwnxpkXzAB8 [3] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/tR44jdPT5Hw Dne 09. 02. 2014 17:26, piše Luc Fabresse: > Hi all, > > ------------ > FACTS > > As you all know, I am the ESUG treasurer. > So please find the numbers attached for the ESUG support of GSOC > projects in 2013. > > ESUG sponsored 3 "extra-GSOC" meaning extra slots not accepted by Google. > In the file it is: Alejandro Infante, Pablo Estefo and Benjamin Arezki. > > All in all we paid: > - 3695EUR (~5000USD at that time i.e. same cost as a regular GSOC) each > projects > - Serge trip to Mentor summit > > And we received 5552EUR from Google > > so yes we lost ~6582EUR > That is easy 13*500 USD would only cover 1 plain extra-Gsoc and we > sponsorized 3. > > I also think that it is important to send someone to the GSoc mentor > summit because it participates to the fact that Google recognizes ESUG > ang gives slots the next year. > > It is alos important to note dates. > ESUG paid first and then has been refund by Google. > It would not be possible to do it without ESUG. > > ------------ > FROM HERE, MY POINT OF VIEW ON THIS STORY: > > As some of you know, I doing the ESUG treasury stuff on my *own* time > and it takes a lot! > I am doing it because I strongly believe that Smalltalk (all falvors!) > is a really great language that should be more widespread. > > I also completely open to discussions. > The ESUG board can also explain its actions and even money status. > I can do errors too. > So if Janko wants some details on GSOC related money, JUST ASK! > > I cannot admit that: > > - Janko wrote about some money accusation. This is directly directed > against the treasurer so me. > And honestly, just reading again that I am biased and that I hide or > steal money make me think that I should better quit. > > - Janko asked for apologies! what is that? even if I would have done a > mistake (and ESUG did not loose money), YOU STILL MUST THANK ME for > DOING THIS BORING TASK! and then I can correct mistakes if any > > - People wants an answer fast, this conversation started yesterday and I > am spending my week-end with my kids > > > I am really fed up with this kind of attitude. > Stop accuse, better ask, discuss and we will solve the problems together > if any. > But I think it will never happen... > > #Luc > The disgusted Treasurer of ESUG who will finish his week-end in bad mood > -- Janko Mivšek Smalltalk GSoC Admin Team

Feb. 9, 2014

The truth on GSOC, ESUG and bad attitude

by Luc Fabresse

Hi all, ------------ FACTS As you all know, I am the ESUG treasurer. So please find the numbers attached for the ESUG support of GSOC projects in 2013. ESUG sponsored 3 "extra-GSOC" meaning extra slots not accepted by Google. In the file it is: Alejandro Infante, Pablo Estefo and Benjamin Arezki. All in all we paid: - 3695EUR (~5000USD at that time i.e. same cost as a regular GSOC) each projects - Serge trip to Mentor summit And we received 5552EUR from Google so yes we lost ~6582EUR That is easy 13*500 USD would only cover 1 plain extra-Gsoc and we sponsorized 3. I also think that it is important to send someone to the GSoc mentor summit because it participates to the fact that Google recognizes ESUG ang gives slots the next year. It is alos important to note dates. ESUG paid first and then has been refund by Google. It would not be possible to do it without ESUG. ------------ FROM HERE, MY POINT OF VIEW ON THIS STORY: As some of you know, I doing the ESUG treasury stuff on my *own* time and it takes a lot! I am doing it because I strongly believe that Smalltalk (all falvors!) is a really great language that should be more widespread. I also completely open to discussions. The ESUG board can also explain its actions and even money status. I can do errors too. So if Janko wants some details on GSOC related money, JUST ASK! I cannot admit that: - Janko wrote about some money accusation. This is directly directed against the treasurer so me. And honestly, just reading again that I am biased and that I hide or steal money make me think that I should better quit. - Janko asked for apologies! what is that? even if I would have done a mistake (and ESUG did not loose money), YOU STILL MUST THANK ME for DOING THIS BORING TASK! and then I can correct mistakes if any - People wants an answer fast, this conversation started yesterday and I am spending my week-end with my kids I am really fed up with this kind of attitude. Stop accuse, better ask, discuss and we will solve the problems together if any. But I think it will never happen... #Luc The disgusted Treasurer of ESUG who will finish his week-end in bad mood

Feb. 9, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] About GSOC mess: Running under 'Smalltalk' org. name

by Clément Bera

I'm really happy to hear that. I think one reason why ESUG tends to be Pharo biased is the lack of projects from other Smalltalk dialects. ESUG and GSOC cannot give money to projects that does not exist. I would love to see this year Squeak, Amber, Pharo, VW, Smalltalk X, GNU smalltalk AND Visual age projects. Then it is the duty to each mentor to advertise his project to find good students and to have his project accepted. We all know that it is a lot of work, but last years all mentors worked hard and the community had good results. Please future mentors propose a project in your favourite smalltalk dialect and do your best to have your GSOC accepted. 2014-02-09 12:58 GMT+01:00 Frank Shearar <frank.shearar(a)gmail.com>: > The Squeak Oversight Board would like to see GSoC projects continue > under the European Smalltalk User Group. > > The Squeak community plans to present several projects this year. > > frank > > On 8 February 2014 09:50, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> > wrote: > > Dear community > > > > On the smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com janko is kind of > declaring > > that ESUG was not doing a good job managing > > GSOC. We feel insulted and we are quite concerned by that fact. > Personally > > if students would not be involved I would vote that ESUG does not have > > anything to do with GSOC. Because it costs us money, time and stress. > Note > > in addition that we never interferred with the choice or anything. > > > > I will ask the ESUG board to decide because we cannot do the job, spend > > time, money and be treated like that. > > Sorry! We are sad but this is like that. > > > > Then we do not like the kind of mails that Janko is sending us about the > > fact that ESUG is biased towards Pharo. > > Where are the research teams and teachers? Of course: the mails of janko > > are just so nice. I let you judge. > > > > It is particularly fun since this year we (the pharo board) decided not > to > > organise a Pharo conference to avoid competing with ESUG. > > > > About motivations for my proposal: > > > > 1. 'Smalltalk' is more recognizable name on first spot that 'ESUG' . And > > this matters when a student looks at around 150 GSoC organizations to > > choose, which one to check and try. See last year list of orgs. > > > > 2. ESUG is currently regarded by many as too biased towards Pharo. Let we > > avoid starting debating is this is true or not. Making our org more > > independent will I hope remove any remaining doubt about that. > > > > > > > > I feel shocked and insulted but I take it easy, having success make you > as > > easy target for jaleous people. This is strange that > > some people would prefer to have a non existing/moving open-source > > smalltalk. May be the losers theory. > > > > I added the answer of marcus below (because marcus usually is much calmer > > than me) so that Janko succeeded to get marcus reacting like that is a > nice > > proof in itself. > > > > Seriously Smalltalk is in a so good shape in presence of lua, Javascript, > > ruby and python, clojure that we should fight. > > > > Excellent idea thank for this nice initiative. > > > > Stef > > > > > > > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > > From: Janko Mivšek <janko.mivsek(a)gmail.com> > > Subject: [gsoc-mentors] Running under 'Smalltalk' org. name > > Date: 8 Feb 2014 08:46:18 GMT+1 > > To: smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com > > Reply-To: smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com > > > > Dear mentors, > > > > I propose that we run this year GSoC simply under 'Smalltalk' name. > > Mentoring organization will be us mentors of past and current GSoCs, as > the > > name 'mentoring organization' implies anyway. Such organization therefore > > doesn't need to be some kind of legal entity. > > > > Because I need to open a new website and we have only one week to > deadline, > > decision needs to be done soon. > > > > Best regards > > Janko > > > > --- > > Janko Mivšek > > Smalltalk GSoC Admin Team > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Smalltalk GSoC mentors" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to smalltalk-gsoc-mentors+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > > > > > > > > Of course you need it: I filled out quite some paperwork for Google. > ESUG is > > an official Google supplier, for that I filled american tax forms and so > on. > > > > Without an organisation that will be very difficult. How do yu receive > money > > for the flight if someone goes to the meeting in the fall? > > > > One of the reasons why the Smalltalk GSOC was accepted was I think that > it > > was the same organisation that is already in the books of google. > > > > And I do not see why to change that: ESUG did a good job, we even lost > money > > (that is, we spend more money on additional Summer of Code slots > > than got in with the money from google). > > We payed all additional expenses of the people going to the Summit: > Google > > only pays the flight and hotel. Everyhting else not (e.g. going from the > > airpot > > to the hotel). > > > > > > What we need to discuss this year is if additional slots make sense: We > had > > last year the fast that > > a) it was very expensive for ESUG > > b) even then, we got complaints that it was unfair that we did not pay > the > > same as google > > c) that it was very extremely unfair that the student could not put > “Google > > Summer of Code” on the CV. > > > > The last is the Killer: money from ESUG is just money. GSoC is more. So > we > > ask if it is really worth to spend the money > > if even the students are not happy about it. > > > > And if your motivation behind is that this way you think it will be > easier > > to enable “Quotas” for different Smalltalks: I think this is a dumb > idea. > > > > Yes, Pharo is very active. So could every other Smalltalk be, too. They > just > > need to do it. If they do not, it is not my duty to limit > > my activity for “Fairness”. Limiting the activity level of those who do > to > > be more “in line” with what those do who do nothing is just > > *insane*. It’s a description of death itself. > > > > Marcus > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Esug-list mailing list > > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org >

Feb. 9, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] About GSOC mess: Running under 'Smalltalk' org. name

by Joachim Tuchel

Hi, we've had the bias debate before - the end of the story was that while some people thought it might look like people in the esug board could be biased, it showed most people who joined the discussion don't bother. And if I remember the thing why the discussion was started back then was not done, so I guess we can forget about that for now. Just one comment: I cannot read from Janko's mail that he thinks esug didn't do a good job of makin gsoc a reality. I was never involved, so I cannot tell if that is thanks to Janko's help or if it was an avhievement of the esug board. In the end, it probably doesnt even matter: the outcome was positive. Re: too much pharo. Is the pharo community to blame for the fact that it generates most interest? I personally would like to see more cross-smalltalk ideas in gsoc, but not having enough time and courage to act as a mentor, who am I to complain? Again, I didn't read Jankos comments as an accusation, more like the attempt to motivate people in other dialects to come out and play. I think Janko and the people who worked with him the last years to make things happen have done a great job and I am happy we've had Smalltalk projects happen, even if I personally have not used any of the contributions. For some, I cant even tell if they went anywhere. For those, fighting is useless, and for the others not worth it: they're open source and can be ported to any dialect. So it would be a pity if we lost Janko's drive and even more if we couldn't be part of gsoc this year due to this debate. I also think a new organization is way too much work and cannot see any problems with esug being the umbrella for Smalltalk projects in gsoc. The worst thing that could happen is another broken link to ancient and outdated Smalltalk information. We've had enough of that. Esug, as any other organization, may not be perfect, but it's the best we have. If it's about domain names, we sure will find sponsors to rent a few smalltalk names and redirect them - althiugh I think promoting what we have a bit more would help more than that. just my 2 cents, Joachim Frank Shearar <frank.shearar(a)gmail.com> schrieb: >The Squeak Oversight Board would like to see GSoC projects continue >under the European Smalltalk User Group. > >The Squeak community plans to present several projects this year. > >frank > >On 8 February 2014 09:50, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: >> Dear community >> >> On the smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com janko is kind of declaring >> that ESUG was not doing a good job managing >> GSOC. We feel insulted and we are quite concerned by that fact. Personally >> if students would not be involved I would vote that ESUG does not have >> anything to do with GSOC. Because it costs us money, time and stress. Note >> in addition that we never interferred with the choice or anything. >> >> I will ask the ESUG board to decide because we cannot do the job, spend >> time, money and be treated like that. >> Sorry! We are sad but this is like that. >> >> Then we do not like the kind of mails that Janko is sending us about the >> fact that ESUG is biased towards Pharo. >> Where are the research teams and teachers? Of course: the mails of janko >> are just so nice. I let you judge. >> >> It is particularly fun since this year we (the pharo board) decided not to >> organise a Pharo conference to avoid competing with ESUG. >> >> About motivations for my proposal: >> >> 1. 'Smalltalk' is more recognizable name on first spot that 'ESUG' . And >> this matters when a student looks at around 150 GSoC organizations to >> choose, which one to check and try. See last year list of orgs. >> >> 2. ESUG is currently regarded by many as too biased towards Pharo. Let we >> avoid starting debating is this is true or not. Making our org more >> independent will I hope remove any remaining doubt about that. >> >> >> >> I feel shocked and insulted but I take it easy, having success make you as >> easy target for jaleous people. This is strange that >> some people would prefer to have a non existing/moving open-source >> smalltalk. May be the losers theory. >> >> I added the answer of marcus below (because marcus usually is much calmer >> than me) so that Janko succeeded to get marcus reacting like that is a nice >> proof in itself. >> >> Seriously Smalltalk is in a so good shape in presence of lua, Javascript, >> ruby and python, clojure that we should fight. >> >> Excellent idea thank for this nice initiative. >> >> Stef >> >> >> >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >> From: Janko Mivšek <janko.mivsek(a)gmail.com> >> Subject: [gsoc-mentors] Running under 'Smalltalk' org. name >> Date: 8 Feb 2014 08:46:18 GMT+1 >> To: smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com >> Reply-To: smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com >> >> Dear mentors, >> >> I propose that we run this year GSoC simply under 'Smalltalk' name. >> Mentoring organization will be us mentors of past and current GSoCs, as the >> name 'mentoring organization' implies anyway. Such organization therefore >> doesn't need to be some kind of legal entity. >> >> Because I need to open a new website and we have only one week to deadline, >> decision needs to be done soon. >> >> Best regards >> Janko >> >> --- >> Janko Mivšek >> Smalltalk GSoC Admin Team >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Smalltalk GSoC mentors" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to smalltalk-gsoc-mentors+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> >> >> >> >> Of course you need it: I filled out quite some paperwork for Google. ESUG is >> an official Google supplier, for that I filled american tax forms and so on. >> >> Without an organisation that will be very difficult. How do yu receive money >> for the flight if someone goes to the meeting in the fall? >> >> One of the reasons why the Smalltalk GSOC was accepted was I think that it >> was the same organisation that is already in the books of google. >> >> And I do not see why to change that: ESUG did a good job, we even lost money >> (that is, we spend more money on additional Summer of Code slots >> than got in with the money from google). >> We payed all additional expenses of the people going to the Summit: Google >> only pays the flight and hotel. Everyhting else not (e.g. going from the >> airpot >> to the hotel). >> >> >> What we need to discuss this year is if additional slots make sense: We had >> last year the fast that >> a) it was very expensive for ESUG >> b) even then, we got complaints that it was unfair that we did not pay the >> same as google >> c) that it was very extremely unfair that the student could not put “Google >> Summer of Code” on the CV. >> >> The last is the Killer: money from ESUG is just money. GSoC is more. So we >> ask if it is really worth to spend the money >> if even the students are not happy about it. >> >> And if your motivation behind is that this way you think it will be easier >> to enable “Quotas” for different Smalltalks: I think this is a dumb idea. >> >> Yes, Pharo is very active. So could every other Smalltalk be, too. They just >> need to do it. If they do not, it is not my duty to limit >> my activity for “Fairness”. Limiting the activity level of those who do to >> be more “in line” with what those do who do nothing is just >> *insane*. It’s a description of death itself. >> >> Marcus >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Esug-list mailing list >> Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org >> http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org >> > >_______________________________________________ >Esug-list mailing list >Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org >http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org

Feb. 9, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] About GSOC mess: Running under 'Smalltalk' org. name

by Frank Shearar

The Squeak Oversight Board would like to see GSoC projects continue under the European Smalltalk User Group. The Squeak community plans to present several projects this year. frank On 8 February 2014 09:50, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > Dear community > > On the smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com janko is kind of declaring > that ESUG was not doing a good job managing > GSOC. We feel insulted and we are quite concerned by that fact. Personally > if students would not be involved I would vote that ESUG does not have > anything to do with GSOC. Because it costs us money, time and stress. Note > in addition that we never interferred with the choice or anything. > > I will ask the ESUG board to decide because we cannot do the job, spend > time, money and be treated like that. > Sorry! We are sad but this is like that. > > Then we do not like the kind of mails that Janko is sending us about the > fact that ESUG is biased towards Pharo. > Where are the research teams and teachers? Of course: the mails of janko > are just so nice. I let you judge. > > It is particularly fun since this year we (the pharo board) decided not to > organise a Pharo conference to avoid competing with ESUG. > > About motivations for my proposal: > > 1. 'Smalltalk' is more recognizable name on first spot that 'ESUG' . And > this matters when a student looks at around 150 GSoC organizations to > choose, which one to check and try. See last year list of orgs. > > 2. ESUG is currently regarded by many as too biased towards Pharo. Let we > avoid starting debating is this is true or not. Making our org more > independent will I hope remove any remaining doubt about that. > > > > I feel shocked and insulted but I take it easy, having success make you as > easy target for jaleous people. This is strange that > some people would prefer to have a non existing/moving open-source > smalltalk. May be the losers theory. > > I added the answer of marcus below (because marcus usually is much calmer > than me) so that Janko succeeded to get marcus reacting like that is a nice > proof in itself. > > Seriously Smalltalk is in a so good shape in presence of lua, Javascript, > ruby and python, clojure that we should fight. > > Excellent idea thank for this nice initiative. > > Stef > > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Janko Mivšek <janko.mivsek(a)gmail.com> > Subject: [gsoc-mentors] Running under 'Smalltalk' org. name > Date: 8 Feb 2014 08:46:18 GMT+1 > To: smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com > Reply-To: smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com > > Dear mentors, > > I propose that we run this year GSoC simply under 'Smalltalk' name. > Mentoring organization will be us mentors of past and current GSoCs, as the > name 'mentoring organization' implies anyway. Such organization therefore > doesn't need to be some kind of legal entity. > > Because I need to open a new website and we have only one week to deadline, > decision needs to be done soon. > > Best regards > Janko > > --- > Janko Mivšek > Smalltalk GSoC Admin Team > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Smalltalk GSoC mentors" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to smalltalk-gsoc-mentors+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > > > Of course you need it: I filled out quite some paperwork for Google. ESUG is > an official Google supplier, for that I filled american tax forms and so on. > > Without an organisation that will be very difficult. How do yu receive money > for the flight if someone goes to the meeting in the fall? > > One of the reasons why the Smalltalk GSOC was accepted was I think that it > was the same organisation that is already in the books of google. > > And I do not see why to change that: ESUG did a good job, we even lost money > (that is, we spend more money on additional Summer of Code slots > than got in with the money from google). > We payed all additional expenses of the people going to the Summit: Google > only pays the flight and hotel. Everyhting else not (e.g. going from the > airpot > to the hotel). > > > What we need to discuss this year is if additional slots make sense: We had > last year the fast that > a) it was very expensive for ESUG > b) even then, we got complaints that it was unfair that we did not pay the > same as google > c) that it was very extremely unfair that the student could not put “Google > Summer of Code” on the CV. > > The last is the Killer: money from ESUG is just money. GSoC is more. So we > ask if it is really worth to spend the money > if even the students are not happy about it. > > And if your motivation behind is that this way you think it will be easier > to enable “Quotas” for different Smalltalks: I think this is a dumb idea. > > Yes, Pharo is very active. So could every other Smalltalk be, too. They just > need to do it. If they do not, it is not my duty to limit > my activity for “Fairness”. Limiting the activity level of those who do to > be more “in line” with what those do who do nothing is just > *insane*. It’s a description of death itself. > > Marcus > > > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org >

Feb. 9, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] Moving on with GSOC2014?

by Steven Kelly

+1. It would be a great service to Smalltalk if we could keep discussions like these calm and on topic. ________________________________ From: Esug-list on behalf of Sean DeNigris Sent: Sat 08/02/2014 21:04 To: smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com Cc: ESUG Mailing list Subject: Re: [Esug-list] Moving on with GSOC2014? I think "Moving On" is the perfect subject. This debate is surreal - creating issues and drama out of thin air. While it's a great demonstration of the passion we all have for Smalltalk, there seems to be some real damage being done. Bottom Line: I agree that it is too late to change anything for this year. And when we do discuss it, let's take a big step back. The two issues Janko raised were: - "Smalltalk" as a name may be better received by students - Within the Smalltalk community, there is perceived bias of ESUG toward Pharo Let's take them one at a time: =="Smalltalk" as a name may be better received by students== 1. Are we having trouble finding quality students now? If so, it pays to discuss. But if we are happy with the current results, IIABDFI 2. If we need to improve, is this particular improvement worth risking: - the possibility that the continuity of ESUG may have helped our acceptance by Google - the tremendous resources, whether time/energy/financial, put in by ESUG ==Within the Smalltalk community, there is perceived bias of ESUG toward Pharo== There's really only one thing to say about this. As it stands now, there is one person's perception of other people's perception. While as Smalltalkers, we can all appreciate the meta-ness of that ;), if such a perception exists, let those who perceive it stand up and give some evidence. Let's focus on the facts, make the best decision for our community, and get back to work.

Feb. 8, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] Moving on with GSOC2014?

by Johan Fabry

+1 on all this. On Feb 8, 2014, at 4:04 PM, Sean DeNigris <sean(a)clipperadams.com> wrote: > I think "Moving On" is the perfect subject. This debate is surreal - creating issues and drama out of thin air. While it's a great demonstration of the passion we all have for Smalltalk, there seems to be some real damage being done. > > Bottom Line: I agree that it is too late to change anything for this year. > > And when we do discuss it, let's take a big step back. The two issues Janko raised were: > - "Smalltalk" as a name may be better received by students > - Within the Smalltalk community, there is perceived bias of ESUG toward Pharo > > Let's take them one at a time: > > =="Smalltalk" as a name may be better received by students== > 1. Are we having trouble finding quality students now? If so, it pays to discuss. But if we are happy with the current results, IIABDFI > 2. If we need to improve, is this particular improvement worth risking: > - the possibility that the continuity of ESUG may have helped our acceptance by Google > - the tremendous resources, whether time/energy/financial, put in by ESUG > > ==Within the Smalltalk community, there is perceived bias of ESUG toward Pharo== > There's really only one thing to say about this. As it stands now, there is one person's perception of other people's perception. While as Smalltalkers, we can all appreciate the meta-ness of that ;), if such a perception exists, let those who perceive it stand up and give some evidence. > > Let's focus on the facts, make the best decision for our community, and get back to work. > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org ---> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org <--- Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry PLEIAD lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile

Feb. 8, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] Moving on with GSOC2014?

by Sean DeNigris

I think "Moving On" is the perfect subject. This debate is surreal - creating issues and drama out of thin air. While it's a great demonstration of the passion we all have for Smalltalk, there seems to be some real damage being done. Bottom Line: I agree that it is too late to change anything for this year. And when we do discuss it, let's take a big step back. The two issues Janko raised were: - "Smalltalk" as a name may be better received by students - Within the Smalltalk community, there is perceived bias of ESUG toward Pharo Let's take them one at a time: =="Smalltalk" as a name may be better received by students== 1. Are we having trouble finding quality students now? If so, it pays to discuss. But if we are happy with the current results, IIABDFI 2. If we need to improve, is this particular improvement worth risking: - the possibility that the continuity of ESUG may have helped our acceptance by Google - the tremendous resources, whether time/energy/financial, put in by ESUG ==Within the Smalltalk community, there is perceived bias of ESUG toward Pharo== There's really only one thing to say about this. As it stands now, there is one person's perception of other people's perception. While as Smalltalkers, we can all appreciate the meta-ness of that ;), if such a perception exists, let those who perceive it stand up and give some evidence. Let's focus on the facts, make the best decision for our community, and get back to work.

Feb. 8, 2014

Moving on with GSOC2014?

by Paolo Bonzini

As things stand now, I don't think there is enough mutual trust between ESUG and Janko to proceed with GSOC2014. I think either the name is changed to "Smalltalk" as Janko proposed, which many people have objected to, or he should take a step back. I have experience with GSOC having served as admin for the GNU project in 2011 so, if necessary, I volunteer to run the organization as admin (and as ESUG). I want to point out _very_ clearly, from the beginning that I wouldn't want to have anything to do with any "extra slots" like there were last year. This would be something for ESUG to sort out if they have the money. Now, I cannot deny that I haven't been involved very much in Smalltalk programming for the last few years. On the other hand administration is mostly bureaucratic work, and I clearly have no bias in favor or against any particular dialect. Regards, Paolo

Feb. 8, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] About GSOC mess: Running under 'Smalltalk' org. name

by Stéphane Ducasse

Hi Paolo during the last ESUg board meeting we discussed (post mortem conference analysis and yearly assessment) and arrived to the same conclusion. Stef > Janko, I don't think that anyone has any doubt about that. The number of proposals is obviously influenced by the popularity of dialects, but I'm 101% sure that prospective mentors are going to vote for them according to the value of the proposal and not the chosen dialect. > > I also don't see the point of investing so much into your own selection system. Google's is "interesting" in some cases, but it's gotten better and better every year. You're free of course to do what you want as the org admin, but I think the choice can only make things more confusing. > > Paolo > >> That's why I propose to go more >> independent under new name 'Smalltalk', besides a clearly better >> visibility of such name of course. >> >> I invite you to follow the debate on GSoC mentor list: >> >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors >> >> All mentors with voting rights on past GSoCs please join back to this >> mailing list and help with debate: >> >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/join > > > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org

Feb. 8, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] About GSOC mess: Running under 'Smalltalk' org. name

by Paolo Bonzini

Il 08/02/2014 11:25, Janko Mivšek ha scritto: > Which is to make GSoC attractive > to all Smalltalkers by removing the last doubt about the any bias > towards any Smalltalk or group. Janko, I don't think that anyone has any doubt about that. The number of proposals is obviously influenced by the popularity of dialects, but I'm 101% sure that prospective mentors are going to vote for them according to the value of the proposal and not the chosen dialect. I also don't see the point of investing so much into your own selection system. Google's is "interesting" in some cases, but it's gotten better and better every year. You're free of course to do what you want as the org admin, but I think the choice can only make things more confusing. Paolo > That's why I propose to go more > independent under new name 'Smalltalk', besides a clearly better > visibility of such name of course. > > I invite you to follow the debate on GSoC mentor list: > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors > > All mentors with voting rights on past GSoCs please join back to this > mailing list and help with debate: > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/join

Feb. 8, 2014

Fwd: Esse status

by Dennis Schetinin

I've just found I didn't send this e-mail to ESUG list. Fixing it now: --------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Dennis Schetinin <chaetal(a)gmail.com> Date: 2014-02-06 10:20 GMT+04:00 Subject: Re: [Esug-list] Esse status To: DeNigris Sean <sean(a)clipperadams.com> Hi Sean, The code is available here: http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Esse.html. I'm not sure this is the final version, but one of the most "recent" ones. Also, I've attached a .rar file with results Pavel submitted to Google (in case, you can't access them from their site). There are two major problems with the project. 1. The code quality is really low. I think, it's not Smalltalk-ish code at all. Unfortunately, I didn't manage to control code in 2012, and was able to manage it only in a fraction of how I would like it to be in 2013. It's really hard to do in GSoC (as it is more feature-oriented and focused on "external" result, not internal quality), but I hope now I understand how to do it (in case I'll take part as tutor, of course). 2. The project suffers from using "conventional" (old) graphics engine. This problem was addressed by a student in one of the thesis works I gave last year, but with only partial success. And worse, for some reasons, the student is not available right now and I can't get the code she wrote. This is for the first time and really frustrating me :( I still think the topic is really important, can be widely used in both applications and development process itself to the advantage of Pharo, and is really interesting. -- Best regards, Dennis Schetinin 2014-02-06 DeNigris Sean <sean(a)clipperadams.com>: > - Boundless and zoomable interfaces with Pharo. Continuation of > http://gsoc2012.esug.org/projects/esse using Athens. Perhaps creating > some development tools. > > What was accomplished? Where is the code? How and where to load it? > > Thanks. > Sean > > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org > >

Feb. 8, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] About GSOC mess: Running under 'Smalltalk' org. name

by Stéphane Ducasse

+ 1 :) > the only thing that I can say is that you cannot say “ESUG is biased” and not wait a response… if you make accusations you will have the concerned people reacting. > Imagine I say in list “Janko is a bad person, but lets avoid that discussion”… obviously that will not happen (and please notice, I’m not saying you are, I’m just using it as an example of a bad choice of argument). > > Esteban

Feb. 8, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] About GSOC mess: Running under 'Smalltalk' org. name

by Stéphane Ducasse

> Guys, could you please stop this debate and focus all this energy on > proposing good topics instead? Try to actually accomplish something? this is what I’m doing since years. > Is this what we want to show as a community? Hasn't this discussion done > enough harm already to the image we show to the world? Come on... Let's > try to be a better community together, not a worse one. Exactly so people should start not to piss on us :) And judge on what we are doing: - new lectures in cameron - support prague community - supporting FAST - supporting new books - pushing to get new lectures (delft, lugano and others I hope that they will be able to do so) Stef >> Dear Smalltalkers, >> >> Stef is overreacting as always, going off-topic and don't want to see >> the real reasons behind this proposal. Which is to make GSoC attractive >> to all Smalltalkers by removing the last doubt about the any bias >> towards any Smalltalk or group. That's why I propose to go more >> independent under new name 'Smalltalk', besides a clearly better >> visibility of such name of course. >> >> I invite you to follow the debate on GSoC mentor list: >> >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors >> >> All mentors with voting rights on past GSoCs please join back to this >> mailing list and help with debate: >> >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/join >> >> Best regards >> Janko >> >> >> >> >> Dne 08. 02. 2014 10:50, piše Stéphane Ducasse: >>> Dear community >>> >>> On the smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com >>> <mailto:smalltalk-gsoc-mentors@googlegroups.com> janko is kind of >>> declaring that ESUG was not doing a good job managing >>> GSOC. We feel insulted and we are quite concerned by that fact. >>> Personally if students would not be involved I would vote that ESUG does >>> not have anything to do with GSOC. Because it costs us money, time and >>> stress. Note in addition that we never interferred with the choice or >>> anything. >>> >>> I will ask the ESUG board to decide because we cannot do the job, spend >>> time, money and be treated like that. >>> Sorry! We are sad but this is like that. >>> >>> Then we do not like the kind of mails that Janko is sending us about the >>> fact that ESUG is biased towards Pharo. >>> Where are the research teams and teachers? Of course: the mails of >>> janko are just so nice. I let you judge. >>> >>> It is particularly fun since this year we (the pharo board) decided not >>> to organise a Pharo conference to avoid competing with ESUG. >>> >>>> About motivations for my proposal: >>>> >>>> 1. 'Smalltalk' is more recognizable name on first spot that 'ESUG' . >>>> And this matters when a student looks at around 150 GSoC organizations >>>> to choose, which one to check and try. See last year list of orgs >>>> <http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/org/list/public/google/gsoc2013>. >>>> >>>> 2. ESUG is currently regarded by many as too biased towards Pharo. Let >>>> we avoid starting debating is this is true or not. Making our org more >>>> independent will I hope remove any remaining doubt about that. >>> >>> >>> I feel shocked and insulted but I take it easy, having success make you >>> as easy target for jaleous people. This is strange that >>> some people would prefer to have a non existing/moving open-source >>> smalltalk. May be the losers theory. >>> >>> I added the answer of marcus below (because marcus usually is much >>> calmer than me) so that Janko succeeded to get marcus reacting like that >>> is a nice proof in itself. >>> >>> Seriously Smalltalk is in a so good shape in presence of lua, >>> Javascript, ruby and python, clojure that we should fight. >>> >>> Excellent idea thank for this nice initiative. >>> >>> Stef >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Begin forwarded message: >>> >>>> *From: *Janko Mivšek <janko.mivsek(a)gmail.com >>>> <mailto:janko.mivsek@gmail.com>> >>>> *Subject: **[gsoc-mentors] Running under 'Smalltalk' org. name* >>>> *Date: *8 Feb 2014 08:46:18 GMT+1 >>>> *To: *smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com >>>> <mailto:smalltalk-gsoc-mentors@googlegroups.com> >>>> *Reply-To: *smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com >>>> <mailto:smalltalk-gsoc-mentors@googlegroups.com> >>>> >>>> Dear mentors, >>>> >>>> I propose that we run this year GSoC simply under 'Smalltalk' name. >>>> Mentoring organization will be us mentors of past and current GSoCs, >>>> as the name 'mentoring organization' implies anyway. Such organization >>>> therefore doesn't need to be some kind of legal entity. >>>> >>>> Because I need to open a new website and we have only one week to >>>> deadline, decision needs to be done soon. >>>> >>>> Best regards >>>> Janko >>>> >>>> --- >>>> Janko Mivšek >>>> Smalltalk GSoC Admin Team >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "Smalltalk GSoC mentors" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to smalltalk-gsoc-mentors+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com >>>> <mailto:smalltalk-gsoc-mentors+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >>> >>> >>> Of course you need it: I filled out quite some paperwork for Google. >>> ESUG is an official Google supplier, for that I filled american tax >>> forms and so on. >>> >>> Without an organisation that will be very difficult. How do yu receive >>> money for the flight if someone goes to the meeting in the fall? >>> >>> One of the reasons why the Smalltalk GSOC was accepted was I think that >>> it was the same organisation that is already in the books of google. >>> >>> And I do not see why to change that: ESUG did a good job, we even lost >>> money (that is, we spend more money on additional Summer of Code slots >>> than got in with the money from google). >>> We payed all additional expenses of the people going to the Summit: >>> Google only pays the flight and hotel. Everyhting else not (e.g. going >>> from the airpot >>> to the hotel). >>> >>> >>> What we need to discuss this year is if additional slots make sense: We >>> had last year the fast that >>> a) it was very expensive for ESUG >>> b) even then, we got complaints that it was unfair that we did not pay >>> the same as google >>> c) that it was very extremely unfair that the student could not put >>> “Google Summer of Code” on the CV. >>> >>> The last is the Killer: money from ESUG is just money. GSoC is more. So >>> we ask if it is really worth to spend the money >>> if even the students are not happy about it. >>> >>> And if your motivation behind is that this way you think it will be >>> easier to enable “Quotas” for different Smalltalks: I think this is a >>> dumb idea. >>> >>> Yes, Pharo is very active. So could every other Smalltalk be, too. They >>> just need to do it. If they do not, it is not my duty to limit >>> my activity for “Fairness”. Limiting the activity level of those who do >>> to be more “in line” with what those do who do nothing is just >>> *insane*. It’s a description of death itself. >>> >>> Marcus >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Esug-list mailing list >>> Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org >>> http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org >>> > > > -- > Nicolas Petton > http://nicolas-petton.fr > > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org

Feb. 8, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] About GSOC mess: Running under 'Smalltalk' org. name

by Nicolas Petton

Guys, could you please stop this debate and focus all this energy on proposing good topics instead? Try to actually accomplish something? Is this what we want to show as a community? Hasn't this discussion done enough harm already to the image we show to the world? Come on... Let's try to be a better community together, not a worse one. Janko Mivšek writes: > Dear Smalltalkers, > > Stef is overreacting as always, going off-topic and don't want to see > the real reasons behind this proposal. Which is to make GSoC attractive > to all Smalltalkers by removing the last doubt about the any bias > towards any Smalltalk or group. That's why I propose to go more > independent under new name 'Smalltalk', besides a clearly better > visibility of such name of course. > > I invite you to follow the debate on GSoC mentor list: > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors > > All mentors with voting rights on past GSoCs please join back to this > mailing list and help with debate: > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/join > > Best regards > Janko > > > > > Dne 08. 02. 2014 10:50, piše Stéphane Ducasse: >> Dear community >> >> On the smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com >> <mailto:smalltalk-gsoc-mentors@googlegroups.com> janko is kind of >> declaring that ESUG was not doing a good job managing >> GSOC. We feel insulted and we are quite concerned by that fact. >> Personally if students would not be involved I would vote that ESUG does >> not have anything to do with GSOC. Because it costs us money, time and >> stress. Note in addition that we never interferred with the choice or >> anything. >> >> I will ask the ESUG board to decide because we cannot do the job, spend >> time, money and be treated like that. >> Sorry! We are sad but this is like that. >> >> Then we do not like the kind of mails that Janko is sending us about the >> fact that ESUG is biased towards Pharo. >> Where are the research teams and teachers? Of course: the mails of >> janko are just so nice. I let you judge. >> >> It is particularly fun since this year we (the pharo board) decided not >> to organise a Pharo conference to avoid competing with ESUG. >> >>> About motivations for my proposal: >>> >>> 1. 'Smalltalk' is more recognizable name on first spot that 'ESUG' . >>> And this matters when a student looks at around 150 GSoC organizations >>> to choose, which one to check and try. See last year list of orgs >>> <http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/org/list/public/google/gsoc2013>. >>> >>> 2. ESUG is currently regarded by many as too biased towards Pharo. Let >>> we avoid starting debating is this is true or not. Making our org more >>> independent will I hope remove any remaining doubt about that. >> >> >> I feel shocked and insulted but I take it easy, having success make you >> as easy target for jaleous people. This is strange that >> some people would prefer to have a non existing/moving open-source >> smalltalk. May be the losers theory. >> >> I added the answer of marcus below (because marcus usually is much >> calmer than me) so that Janko succeeded to get marcus reacting like that >> is a nice proof in itself. >> >> Seriously Smalltalk is in a so good shape in presence of lua, >> Javascript, ruby and python, clojure that we should fight. >> >> Excellent idea thank for this nice initiative. >> >> Stef >> >> >> >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >>> *From: *Janko Mivšek <janko.mivsek(a)gmail.com >>> <mailto:janko.mivsek@gmail.com>> >>> *Subject: **[gsoc-mentors] Running under 'Smalltalk' org. name* >>> *Date: *8 Feb 2014 08:46:18 GMT+1 >>> *To: *smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com >>> <mailto:smalltalk-gsoc-mentors@googlegroups.com> >>> *Reply-To: *smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com >>> <mailto:smalltalk-gsoc-mentors@googlegroups.com> >>> >>> Dear mentors, >>> >>> I propose that we run this year GSoC simply under 'Smalltalk' name. >>> Mentoring organization will be us mentors of past and current GSoCs, >>> as the name 'mentoring organization' implies anyway. Such organization >>> therefore doesn't need to be some kind of legal entity. >>> >>> Because I need to open a new website and we have only one week to >>> deadline, decision needs to be done soon. >>> >>> Best regards >>> Janko >>> >>> --- >>> Janko Mivšek >>> Smalltalk GSoC Admin Team >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Smalltalk GSoC mentors" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to smalltalk-gsoc-mentors+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com >>> <mailto:smalltalk-gsoc-mentors+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> >> >> >> Of course you need it: I filled out quite some paperwork for Google. >> ESUG is an official Google supplier, for that I filled american tax >> forms and so on. >> >> Without an organisation that will be very difficult. How do yu receive >> money for the flight if someone goes to the meeting in the fall? >> >> One of the reasons why the Smalltalk GSOC was accepted was I think that >> it was the same organisation that is already in the books of google. >> >> And I do not see why to change that: ESUG did a good job, we even lost >> money (that is, we spend more money on additional Summer of Code slots >> than got in with the money from google). >> We payed all additional expenses of the people going to the Summit: >> Google only pays the flight and hotel. Everyhting else not (e.g. going >> from the airpot >> to the hotel). >> >> >> What we need to discuss this year is if additional slots make sense: We >> had last year the fast that >> a) it was very expensive for ESUG >> b) even then, we got complaints that it was unfair that we did not pay >> the same as google >> c) that it was very extremely unfair that the student could not put >> “Google Summer of Code” on the CV. >> >> The last is the Killer: money from ESUG is just money. GSoC is more. So >> we ask if it is really worth to spend the money >> if even the students are not happy about it. >> >> And if your motivation behind is that this way you think it will be >> easier to enable “Quotas” for different Smalltalks: I think this is a >> dumb idea. >> >> Yes, Pharo is very active. So could every other Smalltalk be, too. They >> just need to do it. If they do not, it is not my duty to limit >> my activity for “Fairness”. Limiting the activity level of those who do >> to be more “in line” with what those do who do nothing is just >> *insane*. It’s a description of death itself. >> >> Marcus >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Esug-list mailing list >> Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org >> http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org >> -- Nicolas Petton http://nicolas-petton.fr

Feb. 8, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] About GSOC mess: Running under 'Smalltalk' org. name

by Bruce Badger

It's remarkable that for such a small community, centred around an amazing language, we end up being so balkanised (with apologies to the Balkans for using that term). I really don't think setting up a yet another new grouping will help. Unless we we like the balkanisation (I don't) we should work to identify and group around some centre of gravity. Are we really a community worthy of the term 'community'? I do hope we are. On 8 February 2014 10:33, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > the only thing that I can say is that you cannot say “ESUG is biased” and > not wait a response… if you make accusations you will have the concerned > people reacting. > Imagine I say in list “Janko is a bad person, but lets avoid that > discussion”… obviously that will not happen (and please notice, I’m not > saying you are, I’m just using it as an example of a bad choice of > argument). > > Esteban > > On 08 Feb 2014, at 11:25, Janko Mivšek <janko.mivsek(a)eranova.si> wrote: > > > Dear Smalltalkers, > > > > Stef is overreacting as always, going off-topic and don't want to see > > the real reasons behind this proposal. Which is to make GSoC attractive > > to all Smalltalkers by removing the last doubt about the any bias > > towards any Smalltalk or group. That's why I propose to go more > > independent under new name 'Smalltalk', besides a clearly better > > visibility of such name of course. > > > > I invite you to follow the debate on GSoC mentor list: > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors > > > > All mentors with voting rights on past GSoCs please join back to this > > mailing list and help with debate: > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/join > > > > Best regards > > Janko > > > > > > > > > > Dne 08. 02. 2014 10:50, piše Stéphane Ducasse: > >> Dear community > >> > >> On the smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com > >> <mailto:smalltalk-gsoc-mentors@googlegroups.com> janko is kind of > >> declaring that ESUG was not doing a good job managing > >> GSOC. We feel insulted and we are quite concerned by that fact. > >> Personally if students would not be involved I would vote that ESUG does > >> not have anything to do with GSOC. Because it costs us money, time and > >> stress. Note in addition that we never interferred with the choice or > >> anything. > >> > >> I will ask the ESUG board to decide because we cannot do the job, spend > >> time, money and be treated like that. > >> Sorry! We are sad but this is like that. > >> > >> Then we do not like the kind of mails that Janko is sending us about the > >> fact that ESUG is biased towards Pharo. > >> Where are the research teams and teachers? Of course: the mails of > >> janko are just so nice. I let you judge. > >> > >> It is particularly fun since this year we (the pharo board) decided not > >> to organise a Pharo conference to avoid competing with ESUG. > >> > >>> About motivations for my proposal: > >>> > >>> 1. 'Smalltalk' is more recognizable name on first spot that 'ESUG' . > >>> And this matters when a student looks at around 150 GSoC organizations > >>> to choose, which one to check and try. See last year list of orgs > >>> <http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/org/list/public/google/gsoc2013>. > >>> > >>> 2. ESUG is currently regarded by many as too biased towards Pharo. Let > >>> we avoid starting debating is this is true or not. Making our org more > >>> independent will I hope remove any remaining doubt about that. > >> > >> > >> I feel shocked and insulted but I take it easy, having success make you > >> as easy target for jaleous people. This is strange that > >> some people would prefer to have a non existing/moving open-source > >> smalltalk. May be the losers theory. > >> > >> I added the answer of marcus below (because marcus usually is much > >> calmer than me) so that Janko succeeded to get marcus reacting like that > >> is a nice proof in itself. > >> > >> Seriously Smalltalk is in a so good shape in presence of lua, > >> Javascript, ruby and python, clojure that we should fight. > >> > >> Excellent idea thank for this nice initiative. > >> > >> Stef > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Begin forwarded message: > >> > >>> *From: *Janko Mivšek <janko.mivsek(a)gmail.com > >>> <mailto:janko.mivsek@gmail.com>> > >>> *Subject: **[gsoc-mentors] Running under 'Smalltalk' org. name* > >>> *Date: *8 Feb 2014 08:46:18 GMT+1 > >>> *To: *smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com > >>> <mailto:smalltalk-gsoc-mentors@googlegroups.com> > >>> *Reply-To: *smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com > >>> <mailto:smalltalk-gsoc-mentors@googlegroups.com> > >>> > >>> Dear mentors, > >>> > >>> I propose that we run this year GSoC simply under 'Smalltalk' name. > >>> Mentoring organization will be us mentors of past and current GSoCs, > >>> as the name 'mentoring organization' implies anyway. Such organization > >>> therefore doesn't need to be some kind of legal entity. > >>> > >>> Because I need to open a new website and we have only one week to > >>> deadline, decision needs to be done soon. > >>> > >>> Best regards > >>> Janko > >>> > >>> --- > >>> Janko Mivšek > >>> Smalltalk GSoC Admin Team > >>> > >>> -- > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >>> Groups "Smalltalk GSoC mentors" group. > >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > >>> an email to smalltalk-gsoc-mentors+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com > >>> <mailto:smalltalk-gsoc-mentors+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>. > >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > >> > >> > >> > >> Of course you need it: I filled out quite some paperwork for Google. > >> ESUG is an official Google supplier, for that I filled american tax > >> forms and so on. > >> > >> Without an organisation that will be very difficult. How do yu receive > >> money for the flight if someone goes to the meeting in the fall? > >> > >> One of the reasons why the Smalltalk GSOC was accepted was I think that > >> it was the same organisation that is already in the books of google. > >> > >> And I do not see why to change that: ESUG did a good job, we even lost > >> money (that is, we spend more money on additional Summer of Code slots > >> than got in with the money from google). > >> We payed all additional expenses of the people going to the Summit: > >> Google only pays the flight and hotel. Everyhting else not (e.g. going > >> from the airpot > >> to the hotel). > >> > >> > >> What we need to discuss this year is if additional slots make sense: We > >> had last year the fast that > >> a) it was very expensive for ESUG > >> b) even then, we got complaints that it was unfair that we did not pay > >> the same as google > >> c) that it was very extremely unfair that the student could not put > >> “Google Summer of Code” on the CV. > >> > >> The last is the Killer: money from ESUG is just money. GSoC is more. So > >> we ask if it is really worth to spend the money > >> if even the students are not happy about it. > >> > >> And if your motivation behind is that this way you think it will be > >> easier to enable “Quotas” for different Smalltalks: I think this is a > >> dumb idea. > >> > >> Yes, Pharo is very active. So could every other Smalltalk be, too. They > >> just need to do it. If they do not, it is not my duty to limit > >> my activity for “Fairness”. Limiting the activity level of those who do > >> to be more “in line” with what those do who do nothing is just > >> *insane*. It’s a description of death itself. > >> > >> Marcus > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Esug-list mailing list > >> Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > >> http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org > >> > > > > -- > > Janko Mivšek > > Aida/Web > > Smalltalk Web Application Server > > http://www.aidaweb.si > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Esug-list mailing list > > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org > -- Make the most of your skills - with OpenSkills http://www.openskills.org/

Feb. 8, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] About GSOC mess: Running under 'Smalltalk' org. name

by Esteban Lorenzano

the only thing that I can say is that you cannot say “ESUG is biased” and not wait a response… if you make accusations you will have the concerned people reacting. Imagine I say in list “Janko is a bad person, but lets avoid that discussion”… obviously that will not happen (and please notice, I’m not saying you are, I’m just using it as an example of a bad choice of argument). Esteban On 08 Feb 2014, at 11:25, Janko Mivšek <janko.mivsek(a)eranova.si> wrote: > Dear Smalltalkers, > > Stef is overreacting as always, going off-topic and don't want to see > the real reasons behind this proposal. Which is to make GSoC attractive > to all Smalltalkers by removing the last doubt about the any bias > towards any Smalltalk or group. That's why I propose to go more > independent under new name 'Smalltalk', besides a clearly better > visibility of such name of course. > > I invite you to follow the debate on GSoC mentor list: > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors > > All mentors with voting rights on past GSoCs please join back to this > mailing list and help with debate: > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/join > > Best regards > Janko > > > > > Dne 08. 02. 2014 10:50, piše Stéphane Ducasse: >> Dear community >> >> On the smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com >> <mailto:smalltalk-gsoc-mentors@googlegroups.com> janko is kind of >> declaring that ESUG was not doing a good job managing >> GSOC. We feel insulted and we are quite concerned by that fact. >> Personally if students would not be involved I would vote that ESUG does >> not have anything to do with GSOC. Because it costs us money, time and >> stress. Note in addition that we never interferred with the choice or >> anything. >> >> I will ask the ESUG board to decide because we cannot do the job, spend >> time, money and be treated like that. >> Sorry! We are sad but this is like that. >> >> Then we do not like the kind of mails that Janko is sending us about the >> fact that ESUG is biased towards Pharo. >> Where are the research teams and teachers? Of course: the mails of >> janko are just so nice. I let you judge. >> >> It is particularly fun since this year we (the pharo board) decided not >> to organise a Pharo conference to avoid competing with ESUG. >> >>> About motivations for my proposal: >>> >>> 1. 'Smalltalk' is more recognizable name on first spot that 'ESUG' . >>> And this matters when a student looks at around 150 GSoC organizations >>> to choose, which one to check and try. See last year list of orgs >>> <http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/org/list/public/google/gsoc2013>. >>> >>> 2. ESUG is currently regarded by many as too biased towards Pharo. Let >>> we avoid starting debating is this is true or not. Making our org more >>> independent will I hope remove any remaining doubt about that. >> >> >> I feel shocked and insulted but I take it easy, having success make you >> as easy target for jaleous people. This is strange that >> some people would prefer to have a non existing/moving open-source >> smalltalk. May be the losers theory. >> >> I added the answer of marcus below (because marcus usually is much >> calmer than me) so that Janko succeeded to get marcus reacting like that >> is a nice proof in itself. >> >> Seriously Smalltalk is in a so good shape in presence of lua, >> Javascript, ruby and python, clojure that we should fight. >> >> Excellent idea thank for this nice initiative. >> >> Stef >> >> >> >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >>> *From: *Janko Mivšek <janko.mivsek(a)gmail.com >>> <mailto:janko.mivsek@gmail.com>> >>> *Subject: **[gsoc-mentors] Running under 'Smalltalk' org. name* >>> *Date: *8 Feb 2014 08:46:18 GMT+1 >>> *To: *smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com >>> <mailto:smalltalk-gsoc-mentors@googlegroups.com> >>> *Reply-To: *smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com >>> <mailto:smalltalk-gsoc-mentors@googlegroups.com> >>> >>> Dear mentors, >>> >>> I propose that we run this year GSoC simply under 'Smalltalk' name. >>> Mentoring organization will be us mentors of past and current GSoCs, >>> as the name 'mentoring organization' implies anyway. Such organization >>> therefore doesn't need to be some kind of legal entity. >>> >>> Because I need to open a new website and we have only one week to >>> deadline, decision needs to be done soon. >>> >>> Best regards >>> Janko >>> >>> --- >>> Janko Mivšek >>> Smalltalk GSoC Admin Team >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Smalltalk GSoC mentors" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to smalltalk-gsoc-mentors+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com >>> <mailto:smalltalk-gsoc-mentors+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> >> >> >> Of course you need it: I filled out quite some paperwork for Google. >> ESUG is an official Google supplier, for that I filled american tax >> forms and so on. >> >> Without an organisation that will be very difficult. How do yu receive >> money for the flight if someone goes to the meeting in the fall? >> >> One of the reasons why the Smalltalk GSOC was accepted was I think that >> it was the same organisation that is already in the books of google. >> >> And I do not see why to change that: ESUG did a good job, we even lost >> money (that is, we spend more money on additional Summer of Code slots >> than got in with the money from google). >> We payed all additional expenses of the people going to the Summit: >> Google only pays the flight and hotel. Everyhting else not (e.g. going >> from the airpot >> to the hotel). >> >> >> What we need to discuss this year is if additional slots make sense: We >> had last year the fast that >> a) it was very expensive for ESUG >> b) even then, we got complaints that it was unfair that we did not pay >> the same as google >> c) that it was very extremely unfair that the student could not put >> “Google Summer of Code” on the CV. >> >> The last is the Killer: money from ESUG is just money. GSoC is more. So >> we ask if it is really worth to spend the money >> if even the students are not happy about it. >> >> And if your motivation behind is that this way you think it will be >> easier to enable “Quotas” for different Smalltalks: I think this is a >> dumb idea. >> >> Yes, Pharo is very active. So could every other Smalltalk be, too. They >> just need to do it. If they do not, it is not my duty to limit >> my activity for “Fairness”. Limiting the activity level of those who do >> to be more “in line” with what those do who do nothing is just >> *insane*. It’s a description of death itself. >> >> Marcus >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Esug-list mailing list >> Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org >> http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org >> > > -- > Janko Mivšek > Aida/Web > Smalltalk Web Application Server > http://www.aidaweb.si > > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org

Feb. 8, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] About GSOC mess: Running under 'Smalltalk' org. name

by Janko Mivšek

Dear Smalltalkers, Stef is overreacting as always, going off-topic and don't want to see the real reasons behind this proposal. Which is to make GSoC attractive to all Smalltalkers by removing the last doubt about the any bias towards any Smalltalk or group. That's why I propose to go more independent under new name 'Smalltalk', besides a clearly better visibility of such name of course. I invite you to follow the debate on GSoC mentor list: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors All mentors with voting rights on past GSoCs please join back to this mailing list and help with debate: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors/join Best regards Janko Dne 08. 02. 2014 10:50, piše Stéphane Ducasse: > Dear community > > On the smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com > <mailto:smalltalk-gsoc-mentors@googlegroups.com> janko is kind of > declaring that ESUG was not doing a good job managing > GSOC. We feel insulted and we are quite concerned by that fact. > Personally if students would not be involved I would vote that ESUG does > not have anything to do with GSOC. Because it costs us money, time and > stress. Note in addition that we never interferred with the choice or > anything. > > I will ask the ESUG board to decide because we cannot do the job, spend > time, money and be treated like that. > Sorry! We are sad but this is like that. > > Then we do not like the kind of mails that Janko is sending us about the > fact that ESUG is biased towards Pharo. > Where are the research teams and teachers? Of course: the mails of > janko are just so nice. I let you judge. > > It is particularly fun since this year we (the pharo board) decided not > to organise a Pharo conference to avoid competing with ESUG. > >> About motivations for my proposal: >> >> 1. 'Smalltalk' is more recognizable name on first spot that 'ESUG' . >> And this matters when a student looks at around 150 GSoC organizations >> to choose, which one to check and try. See last year list of orgs >> <http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/org/list/public/google/gsoc2013>. >> >> 2. ESUG is currently regarded by many as too biased towards Pharo. Let >> we avoid starting debating is this is true or not. Making our org more >> independent will I hope remove any remaining doubt about that. > > > I feel shocked and insulted but I take it easy, having success make you > as easy target for jaleous people. This is strange that > some people would prefer to have a non existing/moving open-source > smalltalk. May be the losers theory. > > I added the answer of marcus below (because marcus usually is much > calmer than me) so that Janko succeeded to get marcus reacting like that > is a nice proof in itself. > > Seriously Smalltalk is in a so good shape in presence of lua, > Javascript, ruby and python, clojure that we should fight. > > Excellent idea thank for this nice initiative. > > Stef > > > > > Begin forwarded message: > >> *From: *Janko Mivšek <janko.mivsek(a)gmail.com >> <mailto:janko.mivsek@gmail.com>> >> *Subject: **[gsoc-mentors] Running under 'Smalltalk' org. name* >> *Date: *8 Feb 2014 08:46:18 GMT+1 >> *To: *smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com >> <mailto:smalltalk-gsoc-mentors@googlegroups.com> >> *Reply-To: *smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com >> <mailto:smalltalk-gsoc-mentors@googlegroups.com> >> >> Dear mentors, >> >> I propose that we run this year GSoC simply under 'Smalltalk' name. >> Mentoring organization will be us mentors of past and current GSoCs, >> as the name 'mentoring organization' implies anyway. Such organization >> therefore doesn't need to be some kind of legal entity. >> >> Because I need to open a new website and we have only one week to >> deadline, decision needs to be done soon. >> >> Best regards >> Janko >> >> --- >> Janko Mivšek >> Smalltalk GSoC Admin Team >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Smalltalk GSoC mentors" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >> an email to smalltalk-gsoc-mentors+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com >> <mailto:smalltalk-gsoc-mentors+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > > Of course you need it: I filled out quite some paperwork for Google. > ESUG is an official Google supplier, for that I filled american tax > forms and so on. > > Without an organisation that will be very difficult. How do yu receive > money for the flight if someone goes to the meeting in the fall? > > One of the reasons why the Smalltalk GSOC was accepted was I think that > it was the same organisation that is already in the books of google. > > And I do not see why to change that: ESUG did a good job, we even lost > money (that is, we spend more money on additional Summer of Code slots > than got in with the money from google). > We payed all additional expenses of the people going to the Summit: > Google only pays the flight and hotel. Everyhting else not (e.g. going > from the airpot > to the hotel). > > > What we need to discuss this year is if additional slots make sense: We > had last year the fast that > a) it was very expensive for ESUG > b) even then, we got complaints that it was unfair that we did not pay > the same as google > c) that it was very extremely unfair that the student could not put > “Google Summer of Code” on the CV. > > The last is the Killer: money from ESUG is just money. GSoC is more. So > we ask if it is really worth to spend the money > if even the students are not happy about it. > > And if your motivation behind is that this way you think it will be > easier to enable “Quotas” for different Smalltalks: I think this is a > dumb idea. > > Yes, Pharo is very active. So could every other Smalltalk be, too. They > just need to do it. If they do not, it is not my duty to limit > my activity for “Fairness”. Limiting the activity level of those who do > to be more “in line” with what those do who do nothing is just > *insane*. It’s a description of death itself. > > Marcus > > > > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org > -- Janko Mivšek Aida/Web Smalltalk Web Application Server http://www.aidaweb.si

Feb. 8, 2014

About GSOC mess: Running under 'Smalltalk' org. name

by Stéphane Ducasse

Dear community On the smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com janko is kind of declaring that ESUG was not doing a good job managing GSOC. We feel insulted and we are quite concerned by that fact. Personally if students would not be involved I would vote that ESUG does not have anything to do with GSOC. Because it costs us money, time and stress. Note in addition that we never interferred with the choice or anything. I will ask the ESUG board to decide because we cannot do the job, spend time, money and be treated like that. Sorry! We are sad but this is like that. Then we do not like the kind of mails that Janko is sending us about the fact that ESUG is biased towards Pharo. Where are the research teams and teachers? Of course: the mails of janko are just so nice. I let you judge. It is particularly fun since this year we (the pharo board) decided not to organise a Pharo conference to avoid competing with ESUG. > About motivations for my proposal: > > 1. 'Smalltalk' is more recognizable name on first spot that 'ESUG' . And this matters when a student looks at around 150 GSoC organizations to choose, which one to check and try. See last year list of orgs. > > 2. ESUG is currently regarded by many as too biased towards Pharo. Let we avoid starting debating is this is true or not. Making our org more independent will I hope remove any remaining doubt about that. I feel shocked and insulted but I take it easy, having success make you as easy target for jaleous people. This is strange that some people would prefer to have a non existing/moving open-source smalltalk. May be the losers theory. I added the answer of marcus below (because marcus usually is much calmer than me) so that Janko succeeded to get marcus reacting like that is a nice proof in itself. Seriously Smalltalk is in a so good shape in presence of lua, Javascript, ruby and python, clojure that we should fight. Excellent idea thank for this nice initiative. Stef Begin forwarded message: > From: Janko Mivšek <janko.mivsek(a)gmail.com> > Subject: [gsoc-mentors] Running under 'Smalltalk' org. name > Date: 8 Feb 2014 08:46:18 GMT+1 > To: smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com > Reply-To: smalltalk-gsoc-mentors(a)googlegroups.com > > Dear mentors, > > I propose that we run this year GSoC simply under 'Smalltalk' name. Mentoring organization will be us mentors of past and current GSoCs, as the name 'mentoring organization' implies anyway. Such organization therefore doesn't need to be some kind of legal entity. > > Because I need to open a new website and we have only one week to deadline, decision needs to be done soon. > > Best regards > Janko > > --- > Janko Mivšek > Smalltalk GSoC Admin Team > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Smalltalk GSoC mentors" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to smalltalk-gsoc-mentors+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. Of course you need it: I filled out quite some paperwork for Google. ESUG is an official Google supplier, for that I filled american tax forms and so on. Without an organisation that will be very difficult. How do yu receive money for the flight if someone goes to the meeting in the fall? One of the reasons why the Smalltalk GSOC was accepted was I think that it was the same organisation that is already in the books of google. And I do not see why to change that: ESUG did a good job, we even lost money (that is, we spend more money on additional Summer of Code slots than got in with the money from google). We payed all additional expenses of the people going to the Summit: Google only pays the flight and hotel. Everyhting else not (e.g. going from the airpot to the hotel). What we need to discuss this year is if additional slots make sense: We had last year the fast that a) it was very expensive for ESUG b) even then, we got complaints that it was unfair that we did not pay the same as google c) that it was very extremely unfair that the student could not put “Google Summer of Code” on the CV. The last is the Killer: money from ESUG is just money. GSoC is more. So we ask if it is really worth to spend the money if even the students are not happy about it. And if your motivation behind is that this way you think it will be easier to enable “Quotas” for different Smalltalks: I think this is a dumb idea. Yes, Pharo is very active. So could every other Smalltalk be, too. They just need to do it. If they do not, it is not my duty to limit my activity for “Fairness”. Limiting the activity level of those who do to be more “in line” with what those do who do nothing is just *insane*. It’s a description of death itself. Marcus

Feb. 8, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] Google Summer of Code is here, your ideas please!

by Stéphane Ducasse

Hi jano do you need help to create a web page for 2014 because I do not see it. Should we use the 2013 for checking proposed topics? Since the deadline is quite soon how can we help? Stef On 04 Feb 2014, at 11:58, Janko Mivšek <janko.mivsek(a)eranova.si> wrote: > Dear Smalltalkers, > > Tenth GSoC is here and application deadline is earlier this year, > already next Friday! > > Time therefore for your cool project ideas on this year Smalltalk GSoC > Hurry up! > > For now just express any idea you have here on the mailing list. Later > we will together develop it to be in complete format together with two > mentors needed. To see how fully developed ideas look like please look > at 2012 ones at:http://gsoc2013.esug.org/ideas. > > Ideally (but not necessary right now) you should prepare an idea > following this template: > > ----------------------------------------------- > > Title: > > Level: (beginner, intermediate, advanced) > > Possible mentor: (can be assigned later) > > Possible second mentor: (can be assigned later) > > Description > > Technical Details > > Benefits to the Student > > Benefits to the Community > > ------------------------------------------------- > > Note also that students yourselves can propose a GSoC project. So if you > like to be a student on this year GSoC and have a nice idea, don't be > shy and propose it here! The community will listen you and guide to the > really nicely proposed project. > > For the community, start looking around for students. Think about how to > approach the universities near by you, do you know who to contact > there, etc. > > Our special website is in preparation and will be online in few days. > Official Google GSoC site is here: > > http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2014. > > Specially read carefully the FAQ: > > http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/document/show/gsoc_program/google/gsoc20… > > Mentors of all past GSoCs please rejoin the mentors mailing list, where > we discuss all details about this year GSoC: > > http://groups.google.com/group/smalltalk-gsoc-mentors > > While students interested on GSoC please join a special Smalltalk GSoC > mailing list for you: > > http://groups.google.com/group/smalltalk-gsoc-students > > Best regards > Janko > > -- > Janko Mivšek > Smalltalk GSoC Admin Team > > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org

Feb. 8, 2014

Fwd: [Pharo-users] Please help beta test Pharo 3.0 NOW !

by Stéphane Ducasse

Begin forwarded message: > From: Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> > Subject: [Pharo-users] Please help beta test Pharo 3.0 NOW ! > Date: 7 Feb 2014 12:07:17 GMT+1 > To: Any question about pharo is welcome <pharo-users(a)lists.pharo.org>, Pharo Development List <pharo-dev(a)lists.pharo.org> > Reply-To: Any question about pharo is welcome <pharo-users(a)lists.pharo.org> > > Dear fellow Pharoers, > > > Pharo 2.0 was released in March 2013, after which development of Pharo 3.0 started. Since December 2013 we stopped adding new features and started concentrating on fixing bugs. We plan to release Pharo 3.0 in March 2014. > > You can help: please help beta test Pharo 3.0 NOW, before it is released, not after. You can help us tremendously by doing this. Together we can improve the quality and polish for a great release. > > http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/beta-3-0 > > http://www.smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/PharoLauncher > > http://get.pharo.org > > The mailing lists are one way to give feedback, but it is even better to report problems as issues. > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/ > > > Remember, it is your Pharo. > > Thank you! > > > On behalf of the whole team, Sven > >

Feb. 7, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] Esse status

by Carla F. Griggio

There is a summary of the projects of 2012 in this link: http://gsoc2012.esug.org/esug%27s%20gsoc%202012%20projects%20showcase There is a screencast and a documentation file for Esse. Cheers! Carla On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 5:33 AM, DeNigris Sean <sean(a)clipperadams.com> wrote: > - Boundless and zoomable interfaces with Pharo. Continuation of > http://gsoc2012.esug.org/projects/esse using Athens. Perhaps creating > some development tools. > > What was accomplished? Where is the code? How and where to load it? > > Thanks. > Sean > > _______________________________________________ > Esug-list mailing list > Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org > http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org > >

Feb. 7, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] Google Summer of Code is here, your ideas please!

by Esteban Lorenzano

Hi Janko, here my proposal for this year (just one :P) Title: Quartz backend for Athens framework Level: (beginner, intermediate, advanced) Intermediate Possible mentor: (can be assigned later) Esteban Lorenzano Possible second mentor: (can be assigned later) Description Athens is a vectorial graphics library that supports different backends but now is restrained to Cairo. Also, current implementation uses NativeBoost, who at the time generates and executes dynamic code. This combination mades impossible to use the framework for iPad/iPhone applications and we have need to support them. The project then is to create a new backend for the Athens library that can be used both in macs and ipad/iphone platforms. Technical Details The student need to study the current Athens-Balloon and Athens-Cairoo implementation, and the Ballon plugin, to produce a Quartz plugin and to create the Athens extension to use it. Benefits to the Student The student will understand the plugin architecture and how it interacts with the environment, also he will have internals on native boost and vectorial libraries. Benefits to the Community The community will gain the ability of develop better applications for ipad/iphone mobile platforms. thanks, Esteban

Feb. 6, 2014

Esse status

by DeNigris Sean

- Boundless and zoomable interfaces with Pharo. Continuation of http://gsoc2012.esug.org/projects/esse using Athens. Perhaps creating some development tools. What was accomplished? Where is the code? How and where to load it? Thanks. Sean

Feb. 6, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] [Pharo-users] Google Summer of Code is here, your ideas please!

by Sean P. DeNigris

Dennis Schetinin wrote > - Boundless and zoomable interfaces with Pharo. Continuation of > http://gsoc2012.esug.org/projects/esse using Athens. Perhaps creating some > development tools. Yes, please! I saw that Juan may be releasing Morphic 3 soon… wonder if that helps... ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Google-Summer-of-Code-is-here-your-ideas-please-tp474… Sent from the ESUG mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Feb. 6, 2014

Google summer of code

by Jean Marshall and Andy Berry

Hi! I don't really know if it's helpful but 'a few years ago' I put together a part of my website that was about making software simpler. It's www.tof.co.uk/spa Hope you're all having lots of fun and enjoying writing many amazing systems in Smalltalk. Regards, Andy --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com

Feb. 5, 2014

Re: [Esug-list] [Pharo-users] Google Summer of Code is here, your ideas please!

by Dennis Schetinin

Zdravo Janko! - Amber - Pharo interaction via WebSocket. Specifically, Pharo as IDE for Amber -- as continuation of http://gsoc2013.esug.org/projects/amber-tools and http://gsoc2012.esug.org/projects/mmi-amber - Boundless and zoomable interfaces with Pharo. Continuation of http://gsoc2012.esug.org/projects/esse using Athens. Perhaps creating some development tools. - Implementation of "Object Semantic Networks" as a new knowledge-representation engine to be used inside Pharo (for various purposes). -- Best regards, Dennis Schetinin

Feb. 5, 2014