[Esug-list] [Pharo-dev] [gsoc-mentors] The truth on GSOC, ESUG and bad attitude

Marcus Denker marcus.denker at inria.fr
Mon Feb 10 05:14:23 EST 2014

On 10 Feb 2014, at 11:08, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse at inria.fr> wrote:

>> Phil,
>> This matter is actually very important for Smalltalk community, because
>> it exposes nontransparent, meddling behind the scenes, and in some cases
>> blatantly unethical behavior of some ESUG board members. Which is
>> certainly bad for our community on long term.
> "blatantly unethical behavior”
> Really

I propose we do at the next ESUG the following:

- the general assembly sets up and vote for a small group
  (3-5 people?)
- they look into the issues
- then report back to the general assembly

It will of course been taken care that this gremium is independed.

Because via email this is really not going to work.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.esug.org/pipermail/esug-list_lists.esug.org/attachments/20140210/13fd711e/attachment-0002.html>

More information about the Esug-list mailing list