I support it, too.

The only path to action I see is to act. And in this situation, Paolo was the only one that offered a pragmatic way out. Thank you, Paolo! :)

So, I suggest this:
- we take Marcus' suggestion and have the present issue be handled at the next ESUG general assembly. Like this we ensure that the problem is going to be addressed in a more effective environment (namely, more structured, and not via mail).
- we go forward with Paolo as an admin. Like this we ensure that action happens now.

Cheers,
Doru




On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
I support this, along with a general require that you keep this discussion in private.

Esteban

On 10 Feb 2014, at 12:10, Stephan Eggermont <stephan@stack.nl> wrote:

> I no longer have confidence in Janko running as GSoC admin
> and want Paolo to take over as admin for Esug as mentoring organisation.
>
> Stephan Eggermont
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Esug-list mailing list
> Esug-list@lists.esug.org
> http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org


_______________________________________________
Esug-list mailing list
Esug-list@lists.esug.org
http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org



--
www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"