How about: #mapTo: Graham
Giovanni Corriga <mailto:giovanni@corriga.net> 28 March 2020 at 15:35 How about #consume: ?
_______________________________________________ Esug-list mailing list Esug-list@lists.esug.org http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org Norbert Hartl <mailto:norbert@hartl.name> 28 March 2020 at 15:19 I think the name destructDo: comes from destructuring assignment.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/...
Norbert
_______________________________________________ Esug-list mailing list Esug-list@lists.esug.org http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org Mark Plas <mailto:mark.plas@mediagenix.tv> 28 March 2020 at 15:15
Hello Christian,
"I don’t really like the name,"
Maybe you could call it #tupleDo:?
#(1 2 3) tupleDo: [:a :b :c | …]
Mark
**
*Mark Plas*
Software Engineer T +32 2 467 34 30
mark.plas@mediagenix.tv
Nieuwe Gentsesteenweg 21/1 <https://www.google.com/maps/dir/?api=1&destination=50.872900,4.286429>
1702 Groot-Bijgaarden - Belgium <https://www.google.com/maps/dir/?api=1&destination=50.872900,4.286429>
<https://nl.linkedin.com/company/mediagenix-ng> <https://twitter.com/mediagenix_tv><https://www.facebook.com/MEDIAGENIX/>www.mediagenix.tv <http://www.mediagenix.tv>
Directions to MEDIAGENIX <http://www.mediagenix.tv/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Directions.pdf>
/This e-mail and any files attached to it are confidential and intended only for the use of the individuals or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately./
*From:*Esug-list <esug-list-bounces@lists.esug.org> *On Behalf Of *Christian Haider *Sent:* zaterdag 28 maart 2020 13:43 *To:* vwnc@cs.uiuc.edu; esug-list@lists.esug.org; amber-lang@googlegroups.com *Subject:* [Esug-list] destructDo:
Hi,
I am using a nice little method #destructDo: for a while now and it feels good.
In VisualWorks:
SequenceableCollection>>destructDo: aBlock
"Evaluate aBlock with the receiver's elements as parameters.
aBlock takes its arguments from the receiver.
'ok'
#(1 2 3) destructDo: [:a :b :c | a + b + c]
#(1 2 3) destructDo: [:a :b | a + b]
#(1 2 3) destructDo: [:a | a]
#(1 2 3) destructDo: [42]
'not ok'
#(1 2 3) destructDo: [:a :b :c :d | a + b + c + d]
"
^aBlock cullWithArguments: self asArray
In Amber:
SequenceableCollection>>destructDo: aBlock
^aBlock valueWithPossibleArguments: self
In Pharo and other dialects, I don’t know, but should be as easy.
For example you can do
(('2020-03-28' tokensBasedOn: $-) collect: #asNumber) destructDo: [:year :month :day |
Date newDay: day monthNumber: month year: year]
I like that the block is not the receiver (like with #valueWithArguments or #cullWithArguments), but the last argument.
Now the questions:
* I am sure that others came up with this. Anybody knows? * What are you using for this pattern? * I don’t really like the name, but haven’t found anything better yet. Maybe #destructedDo: or just #destructed: or: #withPartsDo:… maybe something shorter? Ideas? * What are you thinking about this?
Happy hacking,
Christian
_______________________________________________ Esug-list mailing list Esug-list@lists.esug.org http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org Christian Haider <mailto:christian.haider@smalltalked-visuals.com> 28 March 2020 at 14:42
Hi,
I am using a nice little method #destructDo: for a while now and it feels good.
In VisualWorks:
SequenceableCollection>>destructDo: aBlock
"Evaluate aBlock with the receiver's elements as parameters.
aBlock takes its arguments from the receiver.
'ok'
#(1 2 3) destructDo: [:a :b :c | a + b + c]
#(1 2 3) destructDo: [:a :b | a + b]
#(1 2 3) destructDo: [:a | a]
#(1 2 3) destructDo: [42]
'not ok'
#(1 2 3) destructDo: [:a :b :c :d | a + b + c + d]
"
^aBlock cullWithArguments: self asArray
In Amber:
SequenceableCollection>>destructDo: aBlock
^aBlock valueWithPossibleArguments: self
In Pharo and other dialects, I don’t know, but should be as easy.
For example you can do
(('2020-03-28' tokensBasedOn: $-) collect: #asNumber) destructDo: [:year :month :day |
Date newDay: day monthNumber: month year: year]
I like that the block is not the receiver (like with #valueWithArguments or #cullWithArguments), but the last argument.
Now the questions:
* I am sure that others came up with this. Anybody knows? * What are you using for this pattern? * I don’t really like the name, but haven’t found anything better yet. Maybe #destructedDo: or just #destructed: or: #withPartsDo:… maybe something shorter? Ideas? * What are you thinking about this?
Happy hacking,
Christian
_______________________________________________ Esug-list mailing list Esug-list@lists.esug.org http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org
