Dear Joachim, and to continue/review at ESUG in workshop or similar, as I suggested in an earlier post? While no doubt some things may benefit from further coding or elaborate documentation, others may need no more than Pier experts helping Pier dummies get started, accompanied by someone noting what the FAQs are, debriefing, and tweaking the existing explanations.
maybe that's an idea for GSoC?
Am 20.03.11 09:35, schrieb Tudor Girba:
I believe that Alex wanted to say that the basic functionalities should be so self evident that they should not need documentation.
Regarding Pier, Lukas did an excellent job of building a content management system for programmers. You would not say about Seaside for example that it is bad because you cannot program it with drag and drop. It is the same for Pier. The main focus was to get it beautiful from a model point of view.
To add a user-friendly interface on top of it would require an explicit and new project on top of Pier. The infrastructure is there and is powerful.
Yours faithfully Niall Ross ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________