You write: ���everyone is happy with MIT so I would suggest going with just that for the Pharo implementation of Sport���. This is the ESUG mailing list where Smalltalk Users of all dialects are participating. Thus I ask why is there the sub-phrase ���just that for the Pharo implementation���? What is with all the other implementations? E.g. VisualWorks where the copyright says: �����Bruce Badger 2004, 2005, 2006. Licensed under the LGPL.���
Georg
Georg Heeg eK, Dortmund und K��then, HR Dortmund A 12812
Wallstra��e 22, 06366 K��then
Tel. +49-3496-214328, Fax +49-3496-214712
Von: Esug-list [mailto:esug-list-bounces@lists.esug.org] Im Auftrag von Bruce Badger
Gesendet: Samstag, 20. Juli 2013 10:08
An: St��phane Ducasse
Cc: esug-list@lists.esug.org Members
Betreff: Re: [Esug-list] About Sport licenses
Yes indeed. Looking at the thread I think everyone is happy with MIT so I would suggest going with just that for the Pharo implementation of Sport rather than using a dual license.
Bruce
On 20 July 2013 08:13, St��phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
Thanks you all.
This is excellent so I think that Sport can be relicensed and this is a good news.
Stef
On Jul 18, 2013, at 6:04 PM, Philippe Marschall <philippe.marschall@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:19 PM, St��phane Ducasse
> <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
>> Hi Sport contributors
>>
>> Today while browsing the seaside repository I saw that there is a
>> Seaside30LGPL and I was puzzled. I looked and I saw that this is because it
>> uses Sport and Sport is licensed under
>> LGPL (probably the only packages in mainstream Smalltalk). I asked Bruce if
>> Sport could be relicensed or have a dual license MIT/LGPL here is his
>> answer:
>>
>> Steph,
>>
>> We've had this discussion before, and as before I'm fine with this in
>> principle but it's not me alone to say. Sport for different dialects was
>> written by different people.
>>
>> Sent from my phone. Please forgive brevity.
>>
>> So if you participated to Sport can you reply to this mail so that we can
>> get a dual license LGPL/MIT.
>
> Should I ever have contributed I agree to dual- or relicensing.
>
> Cheers
> Philippe
>
> _______________________________________________
> Esug-list mailing list
> Esug-list@lists.esug.org
> http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org
_______________________________________________
Esug-list mailing list
Esug-list@lists.esug.org
http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org
--
Make the most of your skills - with OpenSkills
http://www.openskills.org/