
Oct. 29, 2010
5:55 p.m.
"Paolo Bonzini"<bonzini@gnu.org> wrote:
It's definitely a step towards that, though. Does your experience with CVST suggest that it's better to do both steps at the same time?
Fair enough, but I would hope that whatever solution is chosen, it is open towards eventually being able to support cross-dialect projects.
I would be worried that including in an "initial battle plan" an editor-friendly syntax would lead to endless discussions and no code produced.
Yes, but I'm more worried about "real" vs "fake" integration, than I am about particulars of a syntax. With fake integration all you'll get with git is push, pull and commit, leaving all the rest of the capabilities behind. That will not make us a good team player.