May 27, 2011
9:50 p.m.
On 27 May 2011 22:44, Colin Putney <colin@wiresong.com> wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar@gmail.com> wrote:
Indeed, and in these cases and the other appropriate use cases I'd like to see a nicely written, widely used, standardised framework precisely so we (I) don't have to write our (my) own.
FWIW, here's the mock library I use - I think a framework is overkill:
Cool, I'll take a look. I suppose I could say "library" or "package" or whatever instead of "framework". It could be as simple as one or two classes. frank