On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Yoshiki Ohshima <yoshiki@vpri.org> wrote:
At Thu, 26 May 2011 16:45:38 -0300, Martin Dias wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <
marianopeck@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Yoshiki Ohshima <yoshiki@vpri.org>
wrote:
BTW, the page (http://rmod.lille.inria.fr/web/pier/software/Fuel
)
says:
Gofer new squeaksource: 'Fuel'; package: 'ConfigurationOfFuel'; load. ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfFuel) project =latestVersion)
load: #(Core Tests Benchmarks).
it does not appear to be a valid expression. What is the right expression?
the =
Hi! Sorry, now it is fixed.
Thanks! I tried it a bit and I'm officially impressed with its performancce ^^;
I had a simple serializer/materializer that only handles class definitions and compiled methods (and initialization of classes). But Fuel seems faster than that for a factor of two or so for reading methods.
Thanks Yoshiki. So you said Fuel was 2x faster at reading...did you check in writing (serializing) ? we would like to know the difference if possible. Cheers Mariano
(Mine was more on simplicity so it has only a few methods and does some slow way to read sized-strings, as well as generous 4 byte padding. It does make difference when it comes to performance.)
-- Yoshiki
_______________________________________________ Esug-list mailing list Esug-list@lists.esug.org http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org
-- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com