thanks Janko :)

On Jul 18, 2013, at 12:44 PM, Janko Miv��ek <janko.mivsek@eranova.si> wrote:

> Hi Stef,
>
> I as a porter od Sport to Squeak/Pharo am all for Sport to be MIT
> licensed. As I understand past conversations with Bruce the dialect
> porter/maintainer approval is then a satisfying condition for Sport on
> Squeak/Pharo to be MIT licensed.
>
> Best regards
> Janko
>
> Dne 18. 07. 2013 12:19, pi��e St��phane Ducasse:
>> Hi Sport contributors
>>
>> Today while browsing the seaside repository I saw ��that there is a
>> Seaside30LGPL and I was puzzled. I looked and I saw that this is because
>> it uses Sport and Sport is licensed under
>> LGPL (probably the only packages in mainstream Smalltalk). I asked Bruce
>> if Sport could be relicensed or have a dual license MIT/LGPL here is his
>> answer:
>>
>>> Steph,
>>>
>>> We've had this discussion before, and as before I'm fine with this in
>>> principle but it's not me alone to say. ��Sport for different dialects
>>> was written by different people.
>>>
>>> Sent from my phone. ��Please forgive brevity.
>>>
>> So if you participated to Sport can you reply to this mail so that we
>> can get a dual license LGPL/MIT.
>>
>> And yes I'm nervous about mixing licenses in an image-based system that
>> a infinite minority
>> of programmers understand or even know.
>>
>> Stef
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Esug-list mailing list
>> Esug-list@lists.esug.org
>> http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org
>>
>
> --
> Janko Miv��ek
> Aida/Web
> Smalltalk Web Application Server
> http://www.aidaweb.si
>
> _______________________________________________
> Esug-list mailing list
> Esug-list@lists.esug.org
> http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org


_______________________________________________
Esug-list mailing list
Esug-list@lists.esug.org
http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org