Nice! Almost as elegant as Ward's legendary��
Symbol>>value: anObject��
^anObject perform: self��
Mickey!) I don't understand how does it help me.

The method is called #perform:with: and it takes two arguments.����
Yes. But what if I need to emulate "x perform: y with: z" - there is three arguments

How can I do this using perform?

Yes, there is Behavior class that compile everything so non can help this method is good. But what about perform? Message class also require selector and what is selector for keyword messages?

2012/4/29 Jean-Fran��ois LEFEVRE <jflefevre@gmail.com>
You probably want to do something like this :


| x y plu perf wi args |��
x := 3.
y := 4.��
plu := '+'.
perf := 'perform:withArguments:'.
args := Array new: 1.
args at: 1 put: y.
x perform: perf asSymbol withArguments: args

You should look the class Message too.
(and all other classes and methods like Behavior, Class, Metaclass, Method and Object)

Jean-Fran��ois



2012/4/29 Vitaly Kosenko <vitaly.kosenko@gmail.com>
Ok. perform: is working for arithmetic but what about perform: itself?
| x y plu perf wi args |��
x := 3.
y := 4.��
plu := '+'.
perf := 'perform:'.
wi := 'with:'.
args := Array new: 3.
args��
at: 1 put: plu asSymbol;
at: 2 put: wi asSymbol;
at: 3 put: y.
x perform: perf asSymbol withArguments: args.

This code tells me that there is wrong number of arguments in permforn:
How can I fix it?


2012/4/29 vittly <vitaly.kosenko@gmail.com>
Mmm thnx for replie! I'll run this code and experemt with it

2012/4/29 Georg Heeg [via Smalltalk] <[hidden email]>
Please try to understand the following code:

| a b c |

a := 3.
b := 4.
c := '+'.
^a perform: c asSymbol with: b

Georg Heeg eK, Dortmund und K��then, HR Dortmund A 12812
Wallstra��e 22, 06366 K��then
Tel. +49-3496-214328, Fax +49-3496-214712


-----Urspr��ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [hidden email]
[mailto:[hidden email]] Im Auftrag von vittly
Gesendet: Sonntag, 29. April 2012 10:25
An: [hidden email]
Betreff: [Esug-list] metaprogramming in smalltalk

Hi! Please could you help me understand smalltalk capabilities in
metaprogramming? Q: could I construct arbitrary message by program? Create
keywords from strings and than build sequence of them to make a message. Mm?
Or may be store keywords in variables and then pass variables withing
messages extracting stored keywords?
Am I dreamer?)


--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/metaprogramming-in-smalltalk-tp4595928p4595928.html
Sent from the ESUG mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
Esug-list mailing list
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://forum.world.st/metaprogramming-in-smalltalk-tp4595928p4596217.html
To unsubscribe from metaprogramming in smalltalk, click here.
NAML


View this message in context: Re: metaprogramming in smalltalk

Sent from the ESUG mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
Esug-list mailing list
Esug-list@lists.esug.org
http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org



_______________________________________________
Esug-list mailing list
Esug-list@lists.esug.org
http://lists.esug.org/mailman/listinfo/esug-list_lists.esug.org